diff options
author | Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> | 2022-01-27 07:46:06 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2022-01-27 12:03:46 -0800 |
commit | c6f1bfe89ac95dc829dcb4ed54780da134ac5fce (patch) | |
tree | d6d304eb322a72bab4b8d8b88a945a7fdb47b330 /kernel/bpf/verifier.c | |
parent | 7472d5a642c94a0ee1882ff3038de72ffe803a01 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-c6f1bfe89ac95dc829dcb4ed54780da134ac5fce.tar.gz linux-stable-c6f1bfe89ac95dc829dcb4ed54780da134ac5fce.tar.bz2 linux-stable-c6f1bfe89ac95dc829dcb4ed54780da134ac5fce.zip |
bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way
BPF verifier supports direct memory access for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING type
of bpf programs, e.g., a->b. If "a" is a pointer
pointing to kernel memory, bpf verifier will allow user to write
code in C like a->b and the verifier will translate it to a kernel
load properly. If "a" is a pointer to user memory, it is expected
that bpf developer should be bpf_probe_read_user() helper to
get the value a->b. Without utilizing BTF __user tagging information,
current verifier will assume that a->b is a kernel memory access
and this may generate incorrect result.
Now BTF contains __user information, it can check whether the
pointer points to a user memory or not. If it is, the verifier
can reject the program and force users to use bpf_probe_read_user()
helper explicitly.
In the future, we can easily extend btf_add_space for other
address space tagging, for example, rcu/percpu etc.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154606.654961-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 35 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index dcf065ec2774..1ae41d0cf96c 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static bool is_cmpxchg_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn) static const char *reg_type_str(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_reg_type type) { - char postfix[16] = {0}, prefix[16] = {0}; + char postfix[16] = {0}, prefix[32] = {0}; static const char * const str[] = { [NOT_INIT] = "?", [SCALAR_VALUE] = "inv", @@ -570,9 +570,11 @@ static const char *reg_type_str(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } if (type & MEM_RDONLY) - strncpy(prefix, "rdonly_", 16); + strncpy(prefix, "rdonly_", 32); if (type & MEM_ALLOC) - strncpy(prefix, "alloc_", 16); + strncpy(prefix, "alloc_", 32); + if (type & MEM_USER) + strncpy(prefix, "user_", 32); snprintf(env->type_str_buf, TYPE_STR_BUF_LEN, "%s%s%s", prefix, str[base_type(type)], postfix); @@ -1547,14 +1549,15 @@ static void mark_reg_not_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static void mark_btf_ld_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno, enum bpf_reg_type reg_type, - struct btf *btf, u32 btf_id) + struct btf *btf, u32 btf_id, + enum bpf_type_flag flag) { if (reg_type == SCALAR_VALUE) { mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, regno); return; } mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, regno); - regs[regno].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID; + regs[regno].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | flag; regs[regno].btf = btf; regs[regno].btf_id = btf_id; } @@ -4152,6 +4155,7 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg = regs + regno; const struct btf_type *t = btf_type_by_id(reg->btf, reg->btf_id); const char *tname = btf_name_by_offset(reg->btf, t->name_off); + enum bpf_type_flag flag = 0; u32 btf_id; int ret; @@ -4171,9 +4175,16 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; } + if (reg->type & MEM_USER) { + verbose(env, + "R%d is ptr_%s access user memory: off=%d\n", + regno, tname, off); + return -EACCES; + } + if (env->ops->btf_struct_access) { ret = env->ops->btf_struct_access(&env->log, reg->btf, t, - off, size, atype, &btf_id); + off, size, atype, &btf_id, &flag); } else { if (atype != BPF_READ) { verbose(env, "only read is supported\n"); @@ -4181,14 +4192,14 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } ret = btf_struct_access(&env->log, reg->btf, t, off, size, - atype, &btf_id); + atype, &btf_id, &flag); } if (ret < 0) return ret; if (atype == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) - mark_btf_ld_reg(env, regs, value_regno, ret, reg->btf, btf_id); + mark_btf_ld_reg(env, regs, value_regno, ret, reg->btf, btf_id, flag); return 0; } @@ -4201,6 +4212,7 @@ static int check_ptr_to_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, { struct bpf_reg_state *reg = regs + regno; struct bpf_map *map = reg->map_ptr; + enum bpf_type_flag flag = 0; const struct btf_type *t; const char *tname; u32 btf_id; @@ -4238,12 +4250,12 @@ static int check_ptr_to_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; } - ret = btf_struct_access(&env->log, btf_vmlinux, t, off, size, atype, &btf_id); + ret = btf_struct_access(&env->log, btf_vmlinux, t, off, size, atype, &btf_id, &flag); if (ret < 0) return ret; if (value_regno >= 0) - mark_btf_ld_reg(env, regs, value_regno, ret, btf_vmlinux, btf_id); + mark_btf_ld_reg(env, regs, value_regno, ret, btf_vmlinux, btf_id, flag); return 0; } @@ -4444,7 +4456,8 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn if (err < 0) return err; - err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, ®_type, &btf, &btf_id); + err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, ®_type, &btf, + &btf_id); if (err) verbose_linfo(env, insn_idx, "; "); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) { |