summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>2022-02-15 14:57:32 +0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-02-15 10:05:11 -0800
commit8cbf062a250ed52148badf6f3ffd03657dd4a3f0 (patch)
treeb34a52c2bdad8b49f7de4ae951d6f56271f17407 /kernel/bpf
parentd2b94f33e43727c17ed2816c1bfa10e6bc4f4be3 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-8cbf062a250ed52148badf6f3ffd03657dd4a3f0.tar.gz
linux-stable-8cbf062a250ed52148badf6f3ffd03657dd4a3f0.tar.bz2
linux-stable-8cbf062a250ed52148badf6f3ffd03657dd4a3f0.zip
bpf: Reject kfunc calls that overflow insn->imm
Now kfunc call uses s32 to represent the offset between the address of kfunc and __bpf_call_base, but it doesn't check whether or not s32 will be overflowed. The overflow is possible when kfunc is in module and the offset between module and kernel is greater than 2GB. Take arm64 as an example, before commit b2eed9b58811 ("arm64/kernel: kaslr: reduce module randomization range to 2 GB"), the offset between module symbol and __bpf_call_base will in 4GB range due to KASLR and may overflow s32. So add an extra checking to reject these invalid kfunc calls. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220215065732.3179408-1-houtao1@huawei.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c11
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bbef86cb4e72..d7473fee247c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1842,6 +1842,7 @@ static int add_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 func_id, s16 offset)
struct bpf_kfunc_desc *desc;
const char *func_name;
struct btf *desc_btf;
+ unsigned long call_imm;
unsigned long addr;
int err;
@@ -1926,9 +1927,17 @@ static int add_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 func_id, s16 offset)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ call_imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(addr);
+ /* Check whether or not the relative offset overflows desc->imm */
+ if ((unsigned long)(s32)call_imm != call_imm) {
+ verbose(env, "address of kernel function %s is out of range\n",
+ func_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
desc = &tab->descs[tab->nr_descs++];
desc->func_id = func_id;
- desc->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(addr);
+ desc->imm = call_imm;
desc->offset = offset;
err = btf_distill_func_proto(&env->log, desc_btf,
func_proto, func_name,