diff options
author | Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> | 2009-12-20 10:50:02 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-12-21 10:42:29 -0800 |
commit | 0e2c8b8f55072a98b99e7bdad55c912084d6a526 (patch) | |
tree | 80c1ab46950ba15ed04ff6f8a6b8a032d6fbeafa /kernel/resource.c | |
parent | f7b84a6ba7eaeba4e1df8feddca1473a7db369a5 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-0e2c8b8f55072a98b99e7bdad55c912084d6a526.tar.gz linux-stable-0e2c8b8f55072a98b99e7bdad55c912084d6a526.tar.bz2 linux-stable-0e2c8b8f55072a98b99e7bdad55c912084d6a526.zip |
resources: fix call to alignf() in allocate_resource()
The second parameter to alignf() in allocate_resource() must
reflect what new resource is attempted to be allocated, else
functions like pcibios_align_resource() (at least on x86) or
pcmcia_align() can't work correctly.
Commit 1e5ad9679016275d422e36b12a98b0927d76f556 broke this by
setting the "new" resource until we're about to return success.
To keep the resource untouched when allocate_resource() fails,
a "tmp" resource is introduced.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/resource.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/resource.c | 32 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c index dc15686b7a77..af96c1e4b54b 100644 --- a/kernel/resource.c +++ b/kernel/resource.c @@ -308,37 +308,37 @@ static int find_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new, void *alignf_data) { struct resource *this = root->child; - resource_size_t start, end; + struct resource tmp = *new; - start = root->start; + tmp.start = root->start; /* * Skip past an allocated resource that starts at 0, since the assignment - * of this->start - 1 to new->end below would cause an underflow. + * of this->start - 1 to tmp->end below would cause an underflow. */ if (this && this->start == 0) { - start = this->end + 1; + tmp.start = this->end + 1; this = this->sibling; } for(;;) { if (this) - end = this->start - 1; + tmp.end = this->start - 1; else - end = root->end; - if (start < min) - start = min; - if (end > max) - end = max; - start = ALIGN(start, align); + tmp.end = root->end; + if (tmp.start < min) + tmp.start = min; + if (tmp.end > max) + tmp.end = max; + tmp.start = ALIGN(tmp.start, align); if (alignf) - alignf(alignf_data, new, size, align); - if (start < end && end - start >= size - 1) { - new->start = start; - new->end = start + size - 1; + alignf(alignf_data, &tmp, size, align); + if (tmp.start < tmp.end && tmp.end - tmp.start >= size - 1) { + new->start = tmp.start; + new->end = tmp.start + size - 1; return 0; } if (!this) break; - start = this->end + 1; + tmp.start = this->end + 1; this = this->sibling; } return -EBUSY; |