diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2023-08-01 22:41:26 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2023-08-14 17:01:25 +0200 |
commit | 857d315f1201cfcf60e5849c96d2b4dd20f90ebf (patch) | |
tree | 381c58c71eb86504032e8349d2182e909af10559 /kernel/sched | |
parent | 4eb054f92b066ec0a0cba6896ee8eff4c91dfc9e (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-857d315f1201cfcf60e5849c96d2b4dd20f90ebf.tar.gz linux-stable-857d315f1201cfcf60e5849c96d2b4dd20f90ebf.tar.bz2 linux-stable-857d315f1201cfcf60e5849c96d2b4dd20f90ebf.zip |
sched: Simplify ttwu()
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801211812.101069260@infradead.org
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 221 |
1 files changed, 109 insertions, 112 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 65ebf43206b6..68bd68d351a5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -3733,14 +3733,14 @@ ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) struct sched_domain *sd; __schedstat_inc(p->stats.nr_wakeups_remote); - rcu_read_lock(); + + guard(rcu)(); for_each_domain(rq->cpu, sd) { if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd))) { __schedstat_inc(sd->ttwu_wake_remote); break; } } - rcu_read_unlock(); } if (wake_flags & WF_MIGRATED) @@ -4199,10 +4199,9 @@ bool ttwu_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *success) static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) { - unsigned long flags; + guard(preempt)(); int cpu, success = 0; - preempt_disable(); if (p == current) { /* * We're waking current, this means 'p->on_rq' and 'task_cpu(p) @@ -4229,129 +4228,127 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) * reordered with p->state check below. This pairs with smp_store_mb() * in set_current_state() that the waiting thread does. */ - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); - smp_mb__after_spinlock(); - if (!ttwu_state_match(p, state, &success)) - goto unlock; + scoped_guard (raw_spinlock_irqsave, &p->pi_lock) { + smp_mb__after_spinlock(); + if (!ttwu_state_match(p, state, &success)) + break; - trace_sched_waking(p); + trace_sched_waking(p); - /* - * Ensure we load p->on_rq _after_ p->state, otherwise it would - * be possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0 and get stuck - * in smp_cond_load_acquire() below. - * - * sched_ttwu_pending() try_to_wake_up() - * STORE p->on_rq = 1 LOAD p->state - * UNLOCK rq->lock - * - * __schedule() (switch to task 'p') - * LOCK rq->lock smp_rmb(); - * smp_mb__after_spinlock(); - * UNLOCK rq->lock - * - * [task p] - * STORE p->state = UNINTERRUPTIBLE LOAD p->on_rq - * - * Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in - * __schedule(). See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock(). - * - * A similar smb_rmb() lives in try_invoke_on_locked_down_task(). - */ - smp_rmb(); - if (READ_ONCE(p->on_rq) && ttwu_runnable(p, wake_flags)) - goto unlock; + /* + * Ensure we load p->on_rq _after_ p->state, otherwise it would + * be possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0 and get stuck + * in smp_cond_load_acquire() below. + * + * sched_ttwu_pending() try_to_wake_up() + * STORE p->on_rq = 1 LOAD p->state + * UNLOCK rq->lock + * + * __schedule() (switch to task 'p') + * LOCK rq->lock smp_rmb(); + * smp_mb__after_spinlock(); + * UNLOCK rq->lock + * + * [task p] + * STORE p->state = UNINTERRUPTIBLE LOAD p->on_rq + * + * Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in + * __schedule(). See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock(). + * + * A similar smb_rmb() lives in try_invoke_on_locked_down_task(). + */ + smp_rmb(); + if (READ_ONCE(p->on_rq) && ttwu_runnable(p, wake_flags)) + break; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP - /* - * Ensure we load p->on_cpu _after_ p->on_rq, otherwise it would be - * possible to, falsely, observe p->on_cpu == 0. - * - * One must be running (->on_cpu == 1) in order to remove oneself - * from the runqueue. - * - * __schedule() (switch to task 'p') try_to_wake_up() - * STORE p->on_cpu = 1 LOAD p->on_rq - * UNLOCK rq->lock - * - * __schedule() (put 'p' to sleep) - * LOCK rq->lock smp_rmb(); - * smp_mb__after_spinlock(); - * STORE p->on_rq = 0 LOAD p->on_cpu - * - * Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in - * __schedule(). See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock(). - * - * Form a control-dep-acquire with p->on_rq == 0 above, to ensure - * schedule()'s deactivate_task() has 'happened' and p will no longer - * care about it's own p->state. See the comment in __schedule(). - */ - smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(); + /* + * Ensure we load p->on_cpu _after_ p->on_rq, otherwise it would be + * possible to, falsely, observe p->on_cpu == 0. + * + * One must be running (->on_cpu == 1) in order to remove oneself + * from the runqueue. + * + * __schedule() (switch to task 'p') try_to_wake_up() + * STORE p->on_cpu = 1 LOAD p->on_rq + * UNLOCK rq->lock + * + * __schedule() (put 'p' to sleep) + * LOCK rq->lock smp_rmb(); + * smp_mb__after_spinlock(); + * STORE p->on_rq = 0 LOAD p->on_cpu + * + * Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in + * __schedule(). See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock(). + * + * Form a control-dep-acquire with p->on_rq == 0 above, to ensure + * schedule()'s deactivate_task() has 'happened' and p will no longer + * care about it's own p->state. See the comment in __schedule(). + */ + smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(); - /* - * We're doing the wakeup (@success == 1), they did a dequeue (p->on_rq - * == 0), which means we need to do an enqueue, change p->state to - * TASK_WAKING such that we can unlock p->pi_lock before doing the - * enqueue, such as ttwu_queue_wakelist(). - */ - WRITE_ONCE(p->__state, TASK_WAKING); + /* + * We're doing the wakeup (@success == 1), they did a dequeue (p->on_rq + * == 0), which means we need to do an enqueue, change p->state to + * TASK_WAKING such that we can unlock p->pi_lock before doing the + * enqueue, such as ttwu_queue_wakelist(). + */ + WRITE_ONCE(p->__state, TASK_WAKING); - /* - * If the owning (remote) CPU is still in the middle of schedule() with - * this task as prev, considering queueing p on the remote CPUs wake_list - * which potentially sends an IPI instead of spinning on p->on_cpu to - * let the waker make forward progress. This is safe because IRQs are - * disabled and the IPI will deliver after on_cpu is cleared. - * - * Ensure we load task_cpu(p) after p->on_cpu: - * - * set_task_cpu(p, cpu); - * STORE p->cpu = @cpu - * __schedule() (switch to task 'p') - * LOCK rq->lock - * smp_mb__after_spin_lock() smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) - * STORE p->on_cpu = 1 LOAD p->cpu - * - * to ensure we observe the correct CPU on which the task is currently - * scheduling. - */ - if (smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) && - ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags)) - goto unlock; + /* + * If the owning (remote) CPU is still in the middle of schedule() with + * this task as prev, considering queueing p on the remote CPUs wake_list + * which potentially sends an IPI instead of spinning on p->on_cpu to + * let the waker make forward progress. This is safe because IRQs are + * disabled and the IPI will deliver after on_cpu is cleared. + * + * Ensure we load task_cpu(p) after p->on_cpu: + * + * set_task_cpu(p, cpu); + * STORE p->cpu = @cpu + * __schedule() (switch to task 'p') + * LOCK rq->lock + * smp_mb__after_spin_lock() smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) + * STORE p->on_cpu = 1 LOAD p->cpu + * + * to ensure we observe the correct CPU on which the task is currently + * scheduling. + */ + if (smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) && + ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags)) + break; - /* - * If the owning (remote) CPU is still in the middle of schedule() with - * this task as prev, wait until it's done referencing the task. - * - * Pairs with the smp_store_release() in finish_task(). - * - * This ensures that tasks getting woken will be fully ordered against - * their previous state and preserve Program Order. - */ - smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL); + /* + * If the owning (remote) CPU is still in the middle of schedule() with + * this task as prev, wait until it's done referencing the task. + * + * Pairs with the smp_store_release() in finish_task(). + * + * This ensures that tasks getting woken will be fully ordered against + * their previous state and preserve Program Order. + */ + smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL); - cpu = select_task_rq(p, p->wake_cpu, wake_flags | WF_TTWU); - if (task_cpu(p) != cpu) { - if (p->in_iowait) { - delayacct_blkio_end(p); - atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait); - } + cpu = select_task_rq(p, p->wake_cpu, wake_flags | WF_TTWU); + if (task_cpu(p) != cpu) { + if (p->in_iowait) { + delayacct_blkio_end(p); + atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait); + } - wake_flags |= WF_MIGRATED; - psi_ttwu_dequeue(p); - set_task_cpu(p, cpu); - } + wake_flags |= WF_MIGRATED; + psi_ttwu_dequeue(p); + set_task_cpu(p, cpu); + } #else - cpu = task_cpu(p); + cpu = task_cpu(p); #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ - ttwu_queue(p, cpu, wake_flags); -unlock: - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); + ttwu_queue(p, cpu, wake_flags); + } out: if (success) ttwu_stat(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags); - preempt_enable(); return success; } |