diff options
author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-02-16 09:25:31 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-02-16 17:48:59 +0100 |
commit | 58a69cb47ec6991bf006a3e5d202e8571b0327a4 (patch) | |
tree | 56abdf817649c352f70bff3263f9351ed6c42062 /kernel/workqueue.c | |
parent | 7576958a9d5a4a677ad7dd40901cdbb6c1110c98 (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-58a69cb47ec6991bf006a3e5d202e8571b0327a4.tar.gz linux-stable-58a69cb47ec6991bf006a3e5d202e8571b0327a4.tar.bz2 linux-stable-58a69cb47ec6991bf006a3e5d202e8571b0327a4.zip |
workqueue, freezer: unify spelling of 'freeze' + 'able' to 'freezable'
There are two spellings in use for 'freeze' + 'able' - 'freezable' and
'freezeable'. The former is the more prominent one. The latter is
mostly used by workqueue and in a few other odd places. Unify the
spelling to 'freezable'.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Alex Dubov <oakad@yahoo.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 90a17ca2ad0b..88a3e34f51f6 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -2965,7 +2965,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *name, */ spin_lock(&workqueue_lock); - if (workqueue_freezing && wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE) + if (workqueue_freezing && wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) for_each_cwq_cpu(cpu, wq) get_cwq(cpu, wq)->max_active = 0; @@ -3077,7 +3077,7 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active) spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock); - if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE) || + if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) || !(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_FREEZING)) get_cwq(gcwq->cpu, wq)->max_active = max_active; @@ -3327,7 +3327,7 @@ static int __cpuinit trustee_thread(void *__gcwq) * want to get it over with ASAP - spam rescuers, wake up as * many idlers as necessary and create new ones till the * worklist is empty. Note that if the gcwq is frozen, there - * may be frozen works in freezeable cwqs. Don't declare + * may be frozen works in freezable cwqs. Don't declare * completion while frozen. */ while (gcwq->nr_workers != gcwq->nr_idle || @@ -3585,9 +3585,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu); /** * freeze_workqueues_begin - begin freezing workqueues * - * Start freezing workqueues. After this function returns, all - * freezeable workqueues will queue new works to their frozen_works - * list instead of gcwq->worklist. + * Start freezing workqueues. After this function returns, all freezable + * workqueues will queue new works to their frozen_works list instead of + * gcwq->worklist. * * CONTEXT: * Grabs and releases workqueue_lock and gcwq->lock's. @@ -3613,7 +3613,7 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void) list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq); - if (cwq && wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE) + if (cwq && wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) cwq->max_active = 0; } @@ -3624,7 +3624,7 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void) } /** - * freeze_workqueues_busy - are freezeable workqueues still busy? + * freeze_workqueues_busy - are freezable workqueues still busy? * * Check whether freezing is complete. This function must be called * between freeze_workqueues_begin() and thaw_workqueues(). @@ -3633,8 +3633,8 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void) * Grabs and releases workqueue_lock. * * RETURNS: - * %true if some freezeable workqueues are still busy. %false if - * freezing is complete. + * %true if some freezable workqueues are still busy. %false if freezing + * is complete. */ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void) { @@ -3654,7 +3654,7 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void) list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq); - if (!cwq || !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE)) + if (!cwq || !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)) continue; BUG_ON(cwq->nr_active < 0); @@ -3699,7 +3699,7 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void) list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq); - if (!cwq || !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZEABLE)) + if (!cwq || !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)) continue; /* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */ |