diff options
| author | Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> | 2017-06-20 21:01:20 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2017-06-20 15:42:32 -0400 |
| commit | 104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a (patch) | |
| tree | e8a0157f2294f006f31e535949327b3484a5dcb8 /lib/flex_proportions.c | |
| parent | df95e795a722892a9e0603ce4b9b62fab9f02967 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a.tar.gz linux-stable-104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a.tar.bz2 linux-stable-104b4e5139fe384431ac11c3b8a6cf4a529edf4a.zip | |
percpu_counter: Rename __percpu_counter_add to percpu_counter_add_batch
Currently, percpu_counter_add is a wrapper around __percpu_counter_add
which is preempt safe due to explicit calls to preempt_disable. Given
how __ prefix is used in percpu related interfaces, the naming
unfortunately creates the false sense that __percpu_counter_add is
less safe than percpu_counter_add. In terms of context-safety,
they're equivalent. The only difference is that the __ version takes
a batch parameter.
Make this a bit more explicit by just renaming __percpu_counter_add to
percpu_counter_add_batch.
This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.
tj: Minor updates to patch description for clarity. Cosmetic
indentation updates.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/flex_proportions.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/flex_proportions.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/lib/flex_proportions.c b/lib/flex_proportions.c index a71cf1bdd4c9..2cc1f94e03a1 100644 --- a/lib/flex_proportions.c +++ b/lib/flex_proportions.c @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static void fprop_reflect_period_percpu(struct fprop_global *p, if (val < (nr_cpu_ids * PROP_BATCH)) val = percpu_counter_sum(&pl->events); - __percpu_counter_add(&pl->events, + percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, -val + (val >> (period-pl->period)), PROP_BATCH); } else percpu_counter_set(&pl->events, 0); @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void fprop_reflect_period_percpu(struct fprop_global *p, void __fprop_inc_percpu(struct fprop_global *p, struct fprop_local_percpu *pl) { fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl); - __percpu_counter_add(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH); + percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH); percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1); } @@ -267,6 +267,6 @@ void __fprop_inc_percpu_max(struct fprop_global *p, return; } else fprop_reflect_period_percpu(p, pl); - __percpu_counter_add(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH); + percpu_counter_add_batch(&pl->events, 1, PROP_BATCH); percpu_counter_add(&p->events, 1); } |