diff options
author | Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> | 2014-02-10 14:25:50 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-02-10 16:01:43 -0800 |
commit | 8d547ff4ac5927245e0833ac18528f939da0ee0e (patch) | |
tree | df35c19621783cd0c0c8735aab27eed555e48441 /mm/memory-failure.c | |
parent | fb37bb04d6c8d6c44e61d9da189dcfa6aa0f135e (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-8d547ff4ac5927245e0833ac18528f939da0ee0e.tar.gz linux-stable-8d547ff4ac5927245e0833ac18528f939da0ee0e.tar.bz2 linux-stable-8d547ff4ac5927245e0833ac18528f939da0ee0e.zip |
mm/memory-failure.c: move refcount only in !MF_COUNT_INCREASED
mce-test detected a test failure when injecting error to a thp tail
page. This is because we take page refcount of the tail page in
madvise_hwpoison() while the fix in commit a3e0f9e47d5e
("mm/memory-failure.c: transfer page count from head page to tail page
after split thp") assumes that we always take refcount on the head page.
When a real memory error happens we take refcount on the head page where
memory_failure() is called without MF_COUNT_INCREASED set, so it seems
to me that testing memory error on thp tail page using madvise makes
little sense.
This patch cancels moving refcount in !MF_COUNT_INCREASED for valid
testing.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/&&/&/]
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.9+: a3e0f9e47d5e]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memory-failure.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memory-failure.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 4f08a2d61487..2f2f34a4e77d 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -945,8 +945,10 @@ static int hwpoison_user_mappings(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, * to it. Similarly, page lock is shifted. */ if (hpage != p) { - put_page(hpage); - get_page(p); + if (!(flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)) { + put_page(hpage); + get_page(p); + } lock_page(p); unlock_page(hpage); *hpagep = p; |