diff options
| author | Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> | 2024-07-12 11:13:14 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-07-17 21:08:54 -0700 |
| commit | 667574e873b5f77a220b2a93329689f36fb56d5d (patch) | |
| tree | 2a5f896ef694ec8c125b4af205dcff1b52d6a488 /mm | |
| parent | 33dfe9204f29b415bbc0abb1a50642d1ba94f5e9 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-667574e873b5f77a220b2a93329689f36fb56d5d.tar.gz linux-stable-667574e873b5f77a220b2a93329689f36fb56d5d.tar.bz2 linux-stable-667574e873b5f77a220b2a93329689f36fb56d5d.zip | |
mm/hugetlb: fix possible recursive locking detected warning
When tries to demote 1G hugetlb folios, a lockdep warning is observed:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty #79 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
bash/710 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8f0a7850 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0x244/0x460
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&h->resize_lock);
lock(&h->resize_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by bash/710:
#0: ffff8f118439c3f0 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
#1: ffff8f11893b9e88 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf8/0x1d0
#2: ffff8f1183dc4428 (kn->active#98){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x100/0x1d0
#3: ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 710 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty #79
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0
__lock_acquire+0x10f2/0x1ca0
lock_acquire+0xbe/0x2d0
__mutex_lock+0x6d/0x400
demote_store+0x244/0x460
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12c/0x1d0
vfs_write+0x380/0x540
ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
do_syscall_64+0xb9/0x1d0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fa61db14887
RSP: 002b:00007ffc56c48358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007fa61db14887
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000055a030050220 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: 000055a030050220 R08: 00007fa61dbd1460 R09: 000000007fffffff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: 00007fa61dc1b780 R14: 00007fa61dc17600 R15: 00007fa61dc16a00
</TASK>
Lockdep considers this an AA deadlock because the different resize_lock
mutexes reside in the same lockdep class, but this is a false positive.
Place them in distinct classes to avoid these warnings.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240712031314.2570452-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 8531fc6f52f5 ("hugetlb: add hugetlb demote page support")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/hugetlb.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index fd2050934b13..80a93b69652f 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -4642,7 +4642,7 @@ void __init hugetlb_add_hstate(unsigned int order) BUG_ON(hugetlb_max_hstate >= HUGE_MAX_HSTATE); BUG_ON(order < order_base_2(__NR_USED_SUBPAGE)); h = &hstates[hugetlb_max_hstate++]; - mutex_init(&h->resize_lock); + __mutex_init(&h->resize_lock, "resize mutex", &h->resize_key); h->order = order; h->mask = ~(huge_page_size(h) - 1); for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; ++i) |