diff options
| author | Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> | 2020-06-22 16:40:29 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> | 2020-06-24 09:13:13 +0200 |
| commit | 4f47e8ab6ab796b5380f74866fa5287aca4dcc58 (patch) | |
| tree | af80bc6678344ec8fd3592d566ac66c268923faf /net/key | |
| parent | 0275875530f692c725c6f993aced2eca2d6ac50c (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-4f47e8ab6ab796b5380f74866fa5287aca4dcc58.tar.gz linux-stable-4f47e8ab6ab796b5380f74866fa5287aca4dcc58.tar.bz2 linux-stable-4f47e8ab6ab796b5380f74866fa5287aca4dcc58.zip | |
xfrm: policy: match with both mark and mask on user interfaces
In commit ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
it would take 'priority' to make a policy unique, and allow duplicated
policies with different 'priority' to be added, which is not expected
by userland, as Tobias reported in strongswan.
To fix this duplicated policies issue, and also fix the issue in
commit ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
when doing add/del/get/update on user interfaces, this patch is to change
to look up a policy with both mark and mask by doing:
mark.v == pol->mark.v && mark.m == pol->mark.m
and leave the check:
(mark & pol->mark.m) == pol->mark.v
for tx/rx path only.
As the userland expects an exact mark and mask match to manage policies.
v1->v2:
- make xfrm_policy_mark_match inline and fix the changelog as
Tobias suggested.
Fixes: 295fae568885 ("xfrm: Allow user space manipulation of SPD mark")
Fixes: ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list")
Reported-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Tested-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/key')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/key/af_key.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/key/af_key.c b/net/key/af_key.c index b67ed3a8486c..979c579afc63 100644 --- a/net/key/af_key.c +++ b/net/key/af_key.c @@ -2400,7 +2400,7 @@ static int pfkey_spddelete(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sa return err; } - xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(net, DUMMY_MARK, 0, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, + xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(net, &dummy_mark, 0, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, pol->sadb_x_policy_dir - 1, &sel, pol_ctx, 1, &err); security_xfrm_policy_free(pol_ctx); @@ -2651,7 +2651,7 @@ static int pfkey_spdget(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sadb_ return -EINVAL; delete = (hdr->sadb_msg_type == SADB_X_SPDDELETE2); - xp = xfrm_policy_byid(net, DUMMY_MARK, 0, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, + xp = xfrm_policy_byid(net, &dummy_mark, 0, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, dir, pol->sadb_x_policy_id, delete, &err); if (xp == NULL) return -ENOENT; |