diff options
| author | Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> | 2019-12-16 11:38:19 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2020-02-24 08:36:36 +0100 |
| commit | cdd5b09bcbc0c2ee8bfbdaacfe35c61fb297b8a1 (patch) | |
| tree | a1e6f404018cbf868e4e9bb3b949f8a1df5fb5fb /samples | |
| parent | af77e76625be0a16a9f1338080225d3ed39f2f28 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-cdd5b09bcbc0c2ee8bfbdaacfe35c61fb297b8a1.tar.gz linux-stable-cdd5b09bcbc0c2ee8bfbdaacfe35c61fb297b8a1.tar.bz2 linux-stable-cdd5b09bcbc0c2ee8bfbdaacfe35c61fb297b8a1.zip | |
samples/bpf: Set -fno-stack-protector when building BPF programs
[ Upstream commit 450278977acbf494a20367c22fbb38729772d1fc ]
It seems Clang can in some cases turn on stack protection by default, which
doesn't work with BPF. This was reported once before[0], but it seems the
flag to explicitly turn off the stack protector wasn't added to the
Makefile, so do that now.
The symptom of this is compile errors like the following:
error: <unknown>:0:0: in function bpf_prog1 i32 (%struct.__sk_buff*): A call to built-in function '__stack_chk_fail' is not supported.
[0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556400.html
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216103819.359535-1-toke@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'samples')
| -rw-r--r-- | samples/bpf/Makefile | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile index e7ad48c605e0..6d1df7117e11 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ BTF_LLVM_PROBE := $(shell echo "int main() { return 0; }" | \ readelf -S ./llvm_btf_verify.o | grep BTF; \ /bin/rm -f ./llvm_btf_verify.o) +BPF_EXTRA_CFLAGS += -fno-stack-protector ifneq ($(BTF_LLVM_PROBE),) EXTRA_CFLAGS += -g else |