summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/security/integrity
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2013-01-03 14:19:09 -0500
committerMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2013-01-16 15:47:03 -0500
commit7163a993840f0906d4ce1e3f193575c99dac21e1 (patch)
tree3c1c04f5da24cf2492b20b861c9974549978436c /security/integrity
parentcf9ce948f47640797bd19980e1d99c6d17d0bdc3 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-7163a993840f0906d4ce1e3f193575c99dac21e1.tar.gz
linux-stable-7163a993840f0906d4ce1e3f193575c99dac21e1.tar.bz2
linux-stable-7163a993840f0906d4ce1e3f193575c99dac21e1.zip
ima: re-initialize IMA policy LSM info
Although the IMA policy does not change, the LSM policy can be reloaded, leaving the IMA LSM based rules referring to the old, stale LSM policy. This patch updates the IMA LSM based rules to reflect the reloaded LSM policy. Reported-by: Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@siphos.be> tested-by: Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@siphos.be> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/integrity')
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c68
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index af7d182d5a46..70f888de880d 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry {
kuid_t fowner;
struct {
void *rule; /* LSM file metadata specific */
+ void *args_p; /* audit value */
int type; /* audit type */
} lsm[MAX_LSM_RULES];
};
@@ -119,6 +120,35 @@ static int __init default_appraise_policy_setup(char *str)
}
__setup("ima_appraise_tcb", default_appraise_policy_setup);
+/*
+ * Although the IMA policy does not change, the LSM policy can be
+ * reloaded, leaving the IMA LSM based rules referring to the old,
+ * stale LSM policy.
+ *
+ * Update the IMA LSM based rules to reflect the reloaded LSM policy.
+ * We assume the rules still exist; and BUG_ON() if they don't.
+ */
+static void ima_lsm_update_rules(void)
+{
+ struct ima_rule_entry *entry, *tmp;
+ int result;
+ int i;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ima_rules_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ima_policy_rules, list) {
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
+ if (!entry->lsm[i].rule)
+ continue;
+ result = security_filter_rule_init(entry->lsm[i].type,
+ Audit_equal,
+ entry->lsm[i].args_p,
+ &entry->lsm[i].rule);
+ BUG_ON(!entry->lsm[i].rule);
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&ima_rules_mutex);
+}
+
/**
* ima_match_rules - determine whether an inode matches the measure rule.
* @rule: a pointer to a rule
@@ -149,10 +179,11 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
int rc = 0;
u32 osid, sid;
+ int retried = 0;
if (!rule->lsm[i].rule)
continue;
-
+retry:
switch (i) {
case LSM_OBJ_USER:
case LSM_OBJ_ROLE:
@@ -176,6 +207,11 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule,
default:
break;
}
+ if ((rc < 0) && (!retried)) {
+ retried = 1;
+ ima_lsm_update_rules();
+ goto retry;
+ }
if (!rc)
return false;
}
@@ -306,19 +342,27 @@ static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
};
static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry,
- char *args, int lsm_rule, int audit_type)
+ substring_t *args, int lsm_rule, int audit_type)
{
int result;
if (entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule)
return -EINVAL;
+ entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p = match_strdup(args);
+ if (!entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type = audit_type;
result = security_filter_rule_init(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type,
- Audit_equal, args,
+ Audit_equal,
+ entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p,
&entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule);
- if (!entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule)
+ if (!entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule) {
+ kfree(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p);
return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
return result;
}
@@ -481,37 +525,37 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
break;
case Opt_obj_user:
ima_log_string(ab, "obj_user", args[0].from);
- result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args[0].from,
+ result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args,
LSM_OBJ_USER,
AUDIT_OBJ_USER);
break;
case Opt_obj_role:
ima_log_string(ab, "obj_role", args[0].from);
- result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args[0].from,
+ result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args,
LSM_OBJ_ROLE,
AUDIT_OBJ_ROLE);
break;
case Opt_obj_type:
ima_log_string(ab, "obj_type", args[0].from);
- result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args[0].from,
+ result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args,
LSM_OBJ_TYPE,
AUDIT_OBJ_TYPE);
break;
case Opt_subj_user:
ima_log_string(ab, "subj_user", args[0].from);
- result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args[0].from,
+ result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args,
LSM_SUBJ_USER,
AUDIT_SUBJ_USER);
break;
case Opt_subj_role:
ima_log_string(ab, "subj_role", args[0].from);
- result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args[0].from,
+ result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args,
LSM_SUBJ_ROLE,
AUDIT_SUBJ_ROLE);
break;
case Opt_subj_type:
ima_log_string(ab, "subj_type", args[0].from);
- result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args[0].from,
+ result = ima_lsm_rule_init(entry, args,
LSM_SUBJ_TYPE,
AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE);
break;
@@ -589,9 +633,13 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule)
void ima_delete_rules(void)
{
struct ima_rule_entry *entry, *tmp;
+ int i;
mutex_lock(&ima_rules_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ima_policy_rules, list) {
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++)
+ kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
+
list_del(&entry->list);
kfree(entry);
}