summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/security
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKrzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>2020-04-27 12:28:59 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2020-06-22 09:31:17 +0200
commite131e70e2144b36ad0dd0d6b2f2c3ff866ce5604 (patch)
tree7da91591d555ce526223700a464649e558522138 /security
parent2600136eaee989e8a3c8dfcee2581ae238f98964 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-e131e70e2144b36ad0dd0d6b2f2c3ff866ce5604.tar.gz
linux-stable-e131e70e2144b36ad0dd0d6b2f2c3ff866ce5604.tar.bz2
linux-stable-e131e70e2144b36ad0dd0d6b2f2c3ff866ce5604.zip
ima: Set again build_ima_appraise variable
[ Upstream commit b59fda449cf07f2db3be3a67142e6c000f5e8d79 ] After adding the new add_rule() function in commit c52657d93b05 ("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()"), all appraisal flags are added to the temp_ima_appraise variable. Revert to the previous behavior instead of removing build_ima_appraise, to benefit from the protection offered by __ro_after_init. The mentioned commit introduced a bug, as it makes all the flags modifiable, while build_ima_appraise flags can be protected with __ro_after_init. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0.x Fixes: c52657d93b05 ("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()") Co-developed-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c10
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 86624b1331ef..558a7607bf93 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -590,8 +590,14 @@ static void add_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *entries, int count,
list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
}
- if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE)
- temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func);
+ if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE) {
+ if (entries != build_appraise_rules)
+ temp_ima_appraise |=
+ ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func);
+ else
+ build_ima_appraise |=
+ ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func);
+ }
}
}