summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>2021-04-01 17:56:50 -0700
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2021-04-17 08:31:06 -0400
commit3039bcc744980afe87c612122e47a27306483bc2 (patch)
tree2ebb8a15b5a2221d776dada8d9169e6da5dfdb18 /virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
parentc13fda237f08a388ba8a0849785045944bf39834 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-3039bcc744980afe87c612122e47a27306483bc2.tar.gz
linux-stable-3039bcc744980afe87c612122e47a27306483bc2.tar.bz2
linux-stable-3039bcc744980afe87c612122e47a27306483bc2.zip
KVM: Move x86's MMU notifier memslot walkers to generic code
Move the hva->gfn lookup for MMU notifiers into common code. Every arch does a similar lookup, and some arch code is all but identical across multiple architectures. In addition to consolidating code, this will allow introducing optimizations that will benefit all architectures without incurring multiple walks of the memslots, e.g. by taking mmu_lock if and only if a relevant range exists in the memslots. The use of __always_inline to avoid indirect call retpolines, as done by x86, may also benefit other architectures. Consolidating the lookups also fixes a wart in x86, where the legacy MMU and TDP MMU each do their own memslot walks. Lastly, future enhancements to the memslot implementation, e.g. to add an interval tree to track host address, will need to touch far less arch specific code. MIPS, PPC, and arm64 will be converted one at a time in future patches. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20210402005658.3024832-3-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt/kvm/kvm_main.c')
-rw-r--r--virt/kvm/kvm_main.c169
1 files changed, 164 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 5ce91254a793..20836cf342ba 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -451,14 +451,131 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
}
+#ifdef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
+
+typedef bool (*hva_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
+
+struct kvm_hva_range {
+ unsigned long start;
+ unsigned long end;
+ pte_t pte;
+ hva_handler_t handler;
+ bool flush_on_ret;
+ bool may_block;
+};
+
+static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_hva_range *range)
+{
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+ struct kvm_memslots *slots;
+ struct kvm_gfn_range gfn_range;
+ bool ret = false;
+ int i, idx;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
+ slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, i);
+ kvm_for_each_memslot(slot, slots) {
+ unsigned long hva_start, hva_end;
+
+ hva_start = max(range->start, slot->userspace_addr);
+ hva_end = min(range->end, slot->userspace_addr +
+ (slot->npages << PAGE_SHIFT));
+ if (hva_start >= hva_end)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * To optimize for the likely case where the address
+ * range is covered by zero or one memslots, don't
+ * bother making these conditional (to avoid writes on
+ * the second or later invocation of the handler).
+ */
+ gfn_range.pte = range->pte;
+ gfn_range.may_block = range->may_block;
+
+ /*
+ * {gfn(page) | page intersects with [hva_start, hva_end)} =
+ * {gfn_start, gfn_start+1, ..., gfn_end-1}.
+ */
+ gfn_range.start = hva_to_gfn_memslot(hva_start, slot);
+ gfn_range.end = hva_to_gfn_memslot(hva_end + PAGE_SIZE - 1, slot);
+ gfn_range.slot = slot;
+
+ ret |= range->handler(kvm, &gfn_range);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (range->flush_on_ret && (ret || kvm->tlbs_dirty))
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+
+ /* The notifiers are averse to booleans. :-( */
+ return (int)ret;
+}
+
+static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+ unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end,
+ pte_t pte,
+ hva_handler_t handler)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+ const struct kvm_hva_range range = {
+ .start = start,
+ .end = end,
+ .pte = pte,
+ .handler = handler,
+ .flush_on_ret = true,
+ .may_block = false,
+ };
+ int ret;
+
+ KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
+ ret = __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range);
+ KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static __always_inline int kvm_handle_hva_range_no_flush(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+ unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end,
+ hva_handler_t handler)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+ const struct kvm_hva_range range = {
+ .start = start,
+ .end = end,
+ .pte = __pte(0),
+ .handler = handler,
+ .flush_on_ret = false,
+ .may_block = false,
+ };
+ int ret;
+
+ KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
+ ret = __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range);
+ KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+#endif /* KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS */
+
static void kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address,
pte_t pte)
{
struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
- int idx;
+#ifndef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
+ int idx;
+#endif
trace_kvm_set_spte_hva(address);
/*
@@ -468,6 +585,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm->mmu_notifier_count);
+#ifdef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
+ kvm_handle_hva_range(mn, address, address + 1, pte, kvm_set_spte_gfn);
+#else
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
@@ -477,17 +597,32 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+#endif
}
static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
{
struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+#ifdef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
+ const struct kvm_hva_range hva_range = {
+ .start = range->start,
+ .end = range->end,
+ .pte = __pte(0),
+ .handler = kvm_unmap_gfn_range,
+ .flush_on_ret = true,
+ .may_block = mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range),
+ };
+#else
int need_tlb_flush = 0, idx;
+#endif
trace_kvm_unmap_hva_range(range->start, range->end);
+#ifndef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+#endif
+
KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
/*
* The count increase must become visible at unlock time as no
@@ -513,14 +648,21 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
kvm->mmu_notifier_range_end =
max(kvm->mmu_notifier_range_end, range->end);
}
+
+#ifdef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
+ __kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &hva_range);
+#else
need_tlb_flush = kvm_unmap_hva_range(kvm, range->start, range->end,
range->flags);
/* we've to flush the tlb before the pages can be freed */
if (need_tlb_flush || kvm->tlbs_dirty)
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+#endif
KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
+#ifndef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+#endif
return 0;
}
@@ -554,11 +696,15 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
+#ifndef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
int young, idx;
-
+#endif
trace_kvm_age_hva(start, end);
+#ifdef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
+ return kvm_handle_hva_range(mn, start, end, __pte(0), kvm_age_gfn);
+#else
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
@@ -570,6 +716,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
return young;
+#endif
}
static int kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
@@ -577,13 +724,13 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
+#ifndef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
int young, idx;
+#endif
trace_kvm_age_hva(start, end);
- idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
- KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
/*
* Even though we do not flush TLB, this will still adversely
* affect performance on pre-Haswell Intel EPT, where there is
@@ -597,22 +744,33 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
* cadence. If we find this inaccurate, we might come up with a
* more sophisticated heuristic later.
*/
+#ifdef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
+ return kvm_handle_hva_range_no_flush(mn, start, end, kvm_age_gfn);
+#else
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+ KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
young = kvm_age_hva(kvm, start, end);
KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
return young;
+#endif
}
static int kvm_mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address)
{
+#ifndef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
int young, idx;
-
+#endif
trace_kvm_test_age_hva(address);
+#ifdef KVM_ARCH_WANT_NEW_MMU_NOTIFIER_APIS
+ return kvm_handle_hva_range_no_flush(mn, address, address + 1,
+ kvm_test_age_gfn);
+#else
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
young = kvm_test_age_hva(kvm, address);
@@ -620,6 +778,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
return young;
+#endif
}
static void kvm_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn,