summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* mm: don't include asm/pgtable.h if linux/mm.h is already includedMike Rapoport2020-06-09319-319/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch series "mm: consolidate definitions of page table accessors", v2. The low level page table accessors (pXY_index(), pXY_offset()) are duplicated across all architectures and sometimes more than once. For instance, we have 31 definition of pgd_offset() for 25 supported architectures. Most of these definitions are actually identical and typically it boils down to, e.g. static inline unsigned long pmd_index(unsigned long address) { return (address >> PMD_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PMD - 1); } static inline pmd_t *pmd_offset(pud_t *pud, unsigned long address) { return (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud) + pmd_index(address); } These definitions can be shared among 90% of the arches provided XYZ_SHIFT, PTRS_PER_XYZ and xyz_page_vaddr() are defined. For architectures that really need a custom version there is always possibility to override the generic version with the usual ifdefs magic. These patches introduce include/linux/pgtable.h that replaces include/asm-generic/pgtable.h and add the definitions of the page table accessors to the new header. This patch (of 12): The linux/mm.h header includes <asm/pgtable.h> to allow inlining of the functions involving page table manipulations, e.g. pte_alloc() and pmd_alloc(). So, there is no point to explicitly include <asm/pgtable.h> in the files that include <linux/mm.h>. The include statements in such cases are remove with a simple loop: for f in $(git grep -l "include <linux/mm.h>") ; do sed -i -e '/include <asm\/pgtable.h>/ d' $f done Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@intel.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-1-rppt@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-2-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* kernel: rename show_stack_loglvl() => show_stack()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-0939-205/+52
| | | | | | | | | | | Now the last users of show_stack() got converted to use an explicit log level, show_stack_loglvl() can drop it's redundant suffix and become once again well known show_stack(). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-51-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* kernel: use show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-092-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Align the last users of show_stack() by KERN_DEFAULT as the surrounding headers/messages. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-50-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* sched: print stack trace with KERN_INFODmitry Safonov2020-06-091-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Aligning with other messages printed in sched_show_task() - use KERN_INFO to print the backtrace. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-49-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* kdb: don't play with console_loglevelDmitry Safonov2020-06-091-7/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Print the stack trace with KERN_EMERG - it should be always visible. Playing with console_loglevel is a bad idea as there may be more messages printed than wanted. Also the stack trace might be not printed at all if printk() was deferred and console_loglevel was raised back before the trace got flushed. Unfortunately, after rebasing on commit 2277b492582d ("kdb: Fix stack crawling on 'running' CPUs that aren't the master"), kdb_show_stack() uses now kdb_dump_stack_on_cpu(), which for now won't be converted as it uses dump_stack() instead of show_stack(). Convert for now the branch that uses show_stack() and remove console_loglevel exercise from that case. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-48-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* power: use show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Aligning with other watchdog messages just before panic - use KERN_EMERG. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-47-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* x86/amd_gart: print stacktrace for a leak with KERN_ERRDmitry Safonov2020-06-091-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's under CONFIG_IOMMU_LEAK option which is enabled by debug config. Likely the backtrace is worth to be seen - so aligning with log level of error message in iommu_full(). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-46-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* sysrq: use show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-092-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | Show the stack trace on a CPU with the same log level as "CPU%d" header. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-45-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* xtensa: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-4/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-44-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* xtensa: add loglvl to show_trace()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-5/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to show_trace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u [rppt@kernel.org: build fix] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200511194534.GA1018386@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-43-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* x86: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-2/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-42-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* x86: add missing const qualifiers for log_lvlDmitry Safonov2020-06-092-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Keep log_lvl const show_trace_log_lvl() and printk_stack_address() as the new generic show_stack_loglvl() wants to have a proper const qualifier. And gcc rightfully produces warnings in case it's not keept: arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c: In function `show_stack': arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:294:37: warning: passing argument 4 of `show_trace_log_lv ' discards `const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] 294 | show_trace_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, loglvl); | ^~~~~~ arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:163:32: note: expected `char *' but argument is of type `const char *' 163 | unsigned long *stack, char *log_lvl) | ~~~~~~^~~~~~~ [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-41-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* unicore32: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-10/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). As a nice side-effect - print backtrace in __die() with the same log level as the rest of function. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-40-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* unicore32: add loglvl to c_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-093-10/+18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level parameter to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl() [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-39-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* unicore32: remove unused pmode argument in c_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-092-10/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | The pmode parameter isn't used in assembly - remove it. Second argument will be reused for printk() log level. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-38-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* um: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-8/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-37-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* um/sysrq: remove needless variable spDmitry Safonov2020-06-091-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | `sp' is a needless excercise here. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-36-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* sparc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-092-9/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-35-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* sh: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-3/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-34-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* sh: add loglvl to show_trace()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-093-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level parameter to show_trace() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-33-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* sh: add loglvl to printk_address()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-093-5/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to printk_address() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). As a good side-effect show_fault_oops() now prints the address with KERN_EMREG as the rest of output, making sure there won't be situation where "PC: " is printed without actual address. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-32-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* sh: remove needless printk()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | Currently `data' is always an empty line "". No need for additional printk() call. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-31-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* sh: add loglvl to dump_mem()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-093-11/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_mem() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-30-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* s390: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-5/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-29-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* riscv: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-3/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-28-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* powerpc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-5/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-27-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* parisc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-11/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-26-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* openrisc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-4/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-25-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* nios2: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-8/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-24-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* nds32: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-7/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-23-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* mips: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-17/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-22-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* microblaze: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-6/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-21-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* microblaze: add loglvl to microblaze_unwind()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-094-7/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level parameter to microblaze_unwind() as a preparation to add show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-20-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* microblaze: add loglvl to microblaze_unwind_inner()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-15/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to microblaze_unwind_inner() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-19-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* m68k: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-5/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-18-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* ia64: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-3/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-17-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* ia64: pass log level as arg into ia64_do_show_stack()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-092-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to ia64_do_show_stack() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). Also, make ia64_do_show_stack() static as it's not used outside. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-16-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* hexagon: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-14/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). As a good side-effect die() now prints the stacktrace with KERN_EMERG aligned with other messages. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-15-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* h8300: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-6/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-14-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* csky: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-2/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-13-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* c6x: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-7/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <jacquiot.aurelien@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-12-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* arm64: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-2/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-11-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* arm64: add loglvl to dump_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-093-9/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-10-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* arm: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-2/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-9-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* arm: wire up dump_backtrace_{entry,stm}Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-5/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Now that c_backtrace() always emits correct loglvl, use it for printing. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-8-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* arm: add loglvl to dump_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-7/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). As a good side-effect __die() now prints not only "Stack:" header with KERN_EMERG, but the backtrace itself. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-7-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* arm: add loglvl to unwind_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-093-6/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to unwind_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). As a good side-effect arm_syscall() is now printing errors with the same log level as the backtrace. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-6-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* arm/asm: add loglvl to c_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-096-13/+27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-5-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* arc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-093-8/+18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). As a good side-effect header "Stack Trace:" is now printed with the same log level as the rest of backtrace. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-4-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* alpha: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov2020-06-091-11/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-3-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-07-05 03:00:48 +0000