| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch removes the ARM architecture mach-pnx4008. No direct support or user
feedback since 2006. Acknowledgements from NXP/Philips and Linux arm-soc
maintainers.
Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The PNX4008 header file is using the generic gpio and gpiolib
namespace in <mach/gpio.h> yet the GPIO interface is not generic
at all so rename it to <mach/gpio-pnx4008.h>
This fixes a build failure in current -next: the includes were
changed from <mach/gpio.h> to <linux/gpio.h> but since this
platform isn't using generic gpio <linux/gpio.h> did not include
<mach/gpio.h> and things broke apart.
Acked-by: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Convert arch/arm includes of mach/gpio.h and asm/gpio.h to linux/gpio.h
before we start consolidating the individual platform implementations
of the gpio header files.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
arch/arm/mach-pnx4008/include/mach/gpio.h:214: error: implicit declaration of function 'IO_ADDRESS'
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
None of these files use any of the functionality promised by
asm/semaphore.h. It's possible that they rely on it dragging in some
unrelated header file, but I can't build all these files, so we'll have
fix any build failures as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
kbuild explicitly includes this at build time.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
|
|
Patch from Vitaly Wool
This patch adds basic chip support for PNX4008 ARM platform.
It's basically the same as the previous one, but with the rmk's
comments taken into account.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Pervushin <dpervushin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|