summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* PM / wakeirq: report a wakeup_event on dedicated wekup irqGrygorii Strashko2017-11-081-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [ Upstream commit 09bb6e93956ae5175b96905b723ec879c3ca0765 ] There are two reasons for reporting wakeup event when dedicated wakeup IRQ is triggered: - wakeup events accounting, so proper statistical data will be displayed in sysfs and debugfs; - there are small window when System is entering suspend during which dedicated wakeup IRQ can be lost: dpm_suspend_noirq() |- device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs() |- dev_pm_arm_wake_irq(X) |- IRQ is enabled and marked as wakeup source [1]... |- suspend_device_irqs() |- suspend_device_irq(X) |- irqd_set(X, IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED); |- wakup IRQ armed The wakeup IRQ can be lost if it's triggered at point [1] and not armed yet. Hence, fix above cases by adding simple pm_wakeup_event() call in handle_threaded_wake_irq(). Fixes: 4990d4fe327b (PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling) Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> [ tony@atomide.com: added missing return to avoid warnings ] Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* PM / wakeirq: Fix dedicated wakeirq for drivers not using autosuspendTony Lindgren2017-01-121-10/+66
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit bed570307ed78f21b77cb04a1df781dee4a8f05a upstream. I noticed some wakeirq flakeyness with consumer drivers not using autosuspend. For drivers not using autosuspend, the wakeirq may never get unmasked in rpm_suspend() because of irq desc->depth. We are configuring dedicated wakeirqs to start with IRQ_NOAUTOEN as we naturally don't want them running until rpm_suspend() is called. However, when a consumer driver initially calls pm_runtime_get(), we now wrongly start with disable_irq_nosync() call on the dedicated wakeirq that is disabled to start with. This causes desc->depth to toggle between 1 and 2 instead of the usual 0 and 1. This can prevent enable_irq() from unmasking the wakeirq as that only happens at desc->depth 1. This does not necessarily show up with drivers using autosuspend as there is time for disable_irq_nosync() before rpm_suspend() gets called after the autosuspend timeout. Let's fix the issue by adding wirq->status that lazily gets set on the first rpm_suspend(). We also need PM runtime core private functions for dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check() and dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check() so we can enable the dedicated wakeirq on the first rpm_suspend(). While at it, let's also fix the comments for dev_pm_enable_wake_irq() and dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(). Those can still be used by the consumer drivers as needed because the IRQ core manages the interrupt usecount for us. Fixes: 4990d4fe327b (PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling) Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* PM / wakeirq: check that wake IRQ is valid before accepting itDmitry Torokhov2015-11-161-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | Check that IRQ number passed to dev_pm_set_wake_irq() and dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() is valid (not negative) before accepting it. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / wakeirq: Avoid setting power.wakeirq too hastilyRafael J. Wysocki2015-07-071-7/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If dev_pm_attach_wake_irq() fails, the device's power.wakeirq field should not be set to point to the struct wake_irq passed to that function, as that object will be freed going forward. For this reason, make dev_pm_attach_wake_irq() first call device_wakeup_attach_irq() and only set the device's power.wakeirq field if that's successful. That requires device_wakeup_attach_irq() to be called under the device's power.lock lock, but since dev_pm_attach_wake_irq() is the only caller of it, the requisite changes are easy to make. Fixes: 4990d4fe327b (PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling) Reported-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handlingTony Lindgren2015-05-201-0/+273
Turns out we can automate the handling for the device_may_wakeup() quite a bit by using the kernel wakeup source list as suggested by Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>. And as some hardware has separate dedicated wake-up interrupt in addition to the IO interrupt, we can automate the handling by adding a generic threaded interrupt handler that just calls the device PM runtime to wake up the device. This allows dropping code from device drivers as we currently are doing it in multiple ways, and often wrong. For most drivers, we should be able to drop the following boilerplate code from runtime_suspend and runtime_resume functions: ... device_init_wakeup(dev, true); ... if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) enable_irq_wake(irq); ... if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) disable_irq_wake(irq); ... device_init_wakeup(dev, false); ... We can replace it with just the following init and exit time code: ... device_init_wakeup(dev, true); dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq); ... dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev); device_init_wakeup(dev, false); ... And for hardware with dedicated wake-up interrupts: ... device_init_wakeup(dev, true); dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq); ... dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev); device_init_wakeup(dev, false); ... Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>