| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These cases were done with this Coccinelle:
@@
expression H;
expression L;
@@
- (get_random_u32_below(H) + L)
+ get_random_u32_inclusive(L, H + L - 1)
@@
expression H;
expression L;
expression E;
@@
get_random_u32_inclusive(L,
H
- + E
- - E
)
@@
expression H;
expression L;
expression E;
@@
get_random_u32_inclusive(L,
H
- - E
- + E
)
@@
expression H;
expression L;
expression E;
expression F;
@@
get_random_u32_inclusive(L,
H
- - E
+ F
- + E
)
@@
expression H;
expression L;
expression E;
expression F;
@@
get_random_u32_inclusive(L,
H
- + E
+ F
- - E
)
And then subsequently cleaned up by hand, with several automatic cases
rejected if it didn't make sense contextually.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> # for infiniband
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a simple mechanical transformation done by:
@@
expression E;
@@
- prandom_u32_max
+ get_random_u32_below
(E)
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> # for xfs
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> # for damon
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> # for infiniband
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> # for arm
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # for mmc
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Here's enabling software signaling on fence for selftest.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <Arvind.Yadav@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220914164321.2156-4-Arvind.Yadav@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a common allocation helper. Cleaning up the mix of kzalloc/kmalloc
and some unused code in the selftest.
v2: polish kernel doc a bit
v3: polish kernel doc even a bit more
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611120301.10595-3-christian.koenig@amd.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was probably a misunderstand on how the dma-fence-chain is
supposed to work or what dma_fence_chain_find_seqno() is supposed to
return.
dma_fence_chain_find_seqno() is here to give us the fence to wait upon
for a particular point in the timeline. The timeline progresses only
when all the points prior to a given number have completed.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Fixes: dc2f7e67a28a5c ("dma-buf: Exercise dma-fence-chain under selftests")
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/372960/
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
|
|
|
A few very simple testcases to exercise the dma-fence-chain API.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200409110101.18400-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
