summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* firmware: arm_scmi: provide the mandatory device release callbackSudeep Holla2019-01-301-2/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The device/driver model clearly mandates that bus driver that discover and allocate the device must set the release callback. This callback will be used to free the device after all references have gone away. scmi bus driver is missing the obvious callback which will result in the following warning if the device is unregistered: Device 'scmi_dev.1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed. See Documentation/kobject.txt. WARNING at drivers/base/core.c:922 device_release+0x8c/0xa0 Hardware name: ARM LTD Juno Development Platform BIOS EDK II Jan 21 2019 Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO) pc : device_release+0x8c/0xa0 lr : device_release+0x8c/0xa0 Call trace: device_release+0x8c/0xa0 kobject_put+0x8c/0x208 device_unregister+0x30/0x78 scmi_device_destroy+0x28/0x50 scmi_probe+0x354/0x5b0 platform_drv_probe+0x58/0xa8 really_probe+0x2c4/0x3e8 driver_probe_device+0x12c/0x148 __device_attach_driver+0xac/0x150 bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xd8 __device_attach+0xe0/0x168 device_initial_probe+0x24/0x30 bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xa8 deferred_probe_work_func+0x8c/0xe0 process_one_work+0x1f0/0x478 worker_thread+0x22c/0x450 kthread+0x134/0x138 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c ---[ end trace 420bdb7f6af50937 ]--- Fix the issue by providing scmi_device_release callback. We have everything required for device release already in scmi_device_destroy, so we just need to move freeing of the device to scmi_device_release. Fixes: 933c504424a2 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devices") Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.17+ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add a getter for power of performance statesQuentin Perret2018-09-101-0/+28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The SCMI protocol can be used to get power estimates from firmware corresponding to each performance state of a device. Although these power costs are already managed by the SCMI firmware driver, they are not exposed to any external subsystem yet. Fix this by adding a new get_power() interface to the exisiting perf_ops defined for the SCMI protocol. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: use strlcpy to ensure NULL-terminated stringsSudeep Holla2018-09-105-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Replace all the memcpy() for copying name strings from the firmware with strlcpy() to make sure we are bounded by the source buffer size and we also always have NULL-terminated strings. This is needed to avoid out of bounds accesses if the firmware returns a non-terminated string. Reported-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: fix divide by zero when sustained_perf_level is zeroSudeep Holla2018-09-061-1/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Firmware can provide zero as values for sustained performance level and corresponding sustained frequency in kHz in order to hide the actual frequencies and provide only abstract values. It may endup with divide by zero scenario resulting in kernel panic. Let's set the multiplication factor to one if either one or both of them (sustained_perf_level and sustained_freq) are set to zero. Fixes: a9e3fbfaa0ff ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol") Reported-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
* firmware: arm_scmi: remove some unnecessary checksDan Carpenter2018-07-091-5/+0
| | | | | | | | | The "pi->dom_info" buffer is allocated in init() and it can't be NULL here. These tests are sort of weird as well because if "pi->dom_info" was NULL but "domain" was non-zero then it would lead to an Oops. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* Merge tag 'armsoc-drivers' of ↵Linus Torvalds2018-06-118-143/+151
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc Pull ARM SoC driver updates from Olof Johansson: "This contains platform-related driver updates for ARM and ARM64. Highlights: - ARM SCMI (System Control & Management Interface) driver cleanups - Hisilicon support for LPC bus w/ ACPI - Reset driver updates for several platforms: Uniphier, - Rockchip power domain bindings and hardware descriptions for several SoCs. - Tegra memory controller reset improvements" * tag 'armsoc-drivers' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc: (59 commits) ARM: tegra: fix compile-testing PCI host driver soc: rockchip: power-domain: add power domain support for px30 dt-bindings: power: add binding for px30 power domains dt-bindings: power: add PX30 SoCs header for power-domain soc: rockchip: power-domain: add power domain support for rk3228 dt-bindings: power: add binding for rk3228 power domains dt-bindings: power: add RK3228 SoCs header for power-domain soc: rockchip: power-domain: add power domain support for rk3128 dt-bindings: power: add binding for rk3128 power domains dt-bindings: power: add RK3128 SoCs header for power-domain soc: rockchip: power-domain: add power domain support for rk3036 dt-bindings: power: add binding for rk3036 power domains dt-bindings: power: add RK3036 SoCs header for power-domain dt-bindings: memory: tegra: Remove Tegra114 SATA and AFI reset definitions memory: tegra: Remove Tegra114 SATA and AFI reset definitions memory: tegra: Register SMMU after MC driver became ready soc: mediatek: remove unneeded semicolon soc: mediatek: add a fixed wait for SRAM stable soc: mediatek: introduce a CAPS flag for scp_domain_data soc: mediatek: reuse regmap_read_poll_timeout helpers ...
| * Merge tag 'scmi-updates-4.18' of ↵Olof Johansson2018-05-158-143/+151
| |\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux into next/drivers SCMI cleanups for v4.18 This contains all of the trivial review comments that were not addressed as the series was already queued up for v4.17 and were not critical to go as fixes. They generally just improve code readability, fix kernel-docs, remove unused/unnecessary code, follow standard function naming and simplifies certain exit paths. * tag 'scmi-updates-4.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux: firmware: arm_scmi: simplify exit path by returning on error firmware: arm_scmi: improve exit paths and code readability firmware: arm_scmi: remove unnecessary bitmap_zero firmware: arm_scmi: drop unused `con_priv` structure member firmware: arm_scmi: rename scmi_xfer_{init,get,put} firmware: arm_scmi: rename get_transition_latency and add_opps_to_device firmware: arm_scmi: fix kernel-docs documentation firmware: arm_scmi: improve code readability using bitfield accessor macros Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
| | * firmware: arm_scmi: simplify exit path by returning on errorSudeep Holla2018-05-101-5/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Yet another nasty indentation left out during code restructuring. It's must simpler to return on error instead of having unnecessary indentation. Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
| | * firmware: arm_scmi: improve exit paths and code readabilitySudeep Holla2018-05-101-10/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The existing code intends the good path to reduce the code which is so uncommon. It's obvious to have more readable code with a goto used for the error path. This patch adds more appropriate error paths and makes code more readable. It also moves a error logging outside the scope of locking. Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
| | * firmware: arm_scmi: remove unnecessary bitmap_zeroSudeep Holla2018-05-101-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | kcalloc zeros the memory and it's totally unnecessary to zero the bitmap again using bitmap_zero. This patch just drops the unnecessary use of the bitmap_zero in the context. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
| | * firmware: arm_scmi: drop unused `con_priv` structure memberSudeep Holla2018-05-101-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Initially con_priv was supposedly used for transport specific data when the SCMI driver had an abstraction to communicate with different mailbox controllers. But after some discussions, the idea was dropped but this variable slipped through the cracks. This patch gets rid of this unused variable. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
| | * firmware: arm_scmi: rename scmi_xfer_{init,get,put}Sudeep Holla2018-05-107-66/+69
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Just after the initial patches were queued, Jonathan Cameron mentioned that scmi_one_xfer_{get_put} were not very clear and suggested to use scmi_xfer_{alloc,free}. While I agree to some extent, the reason not to have alloc/free as these are preallocated buffers and these functions just returns a reference to free slot in that preallocated array. However it was agreed to drop "_one" as it's implicit that we are always dealing with one slot anyways. This patch updates the name accordingly dropping "_one" in both {get,put} functions. Also scmi_one_xfer_init is renamed as scmi_xfer_get_init to reflect the fact that it gets the free slots and then initialise it. Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
| | * firmware: arm_scmi: rename get_transition_latency and add_opps_to_deviceSudeep Holla2018-05-101-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Most of the scmi code follows the suggestion from Greg KH on a totally different thread[0] to have the subsystem name first, followed by the noun and finally the verb with couple of these exceptions. This patch fixes them so that all the functions names are aligned to that practice. [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg583673.html Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
| | * firmware: arm_scmi: fix kernel-docs documentationSudeep Holla2018-05-093-32/+40
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are few missing descriptions for function parameters and structure members along with certain instances where excessive function parameters or structure members are described. This patch fixes all of those warnings. Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
| | * firmware: arm_scmi: improve code readability using bitfield accessor macrosSudeep Holla2018-05-092-21/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | By using FIELD_{FIT,GET,PREP} and GENMASK macro accessors we can avoid some clumpsy custom shifting and masking macros and also improve the code better readability. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* | | Merge tag 'scmi-fixes-4.17' of ↵Olof Johansson2018-05-141-0/+1
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux into fixes SCMI fix for v4.17 A single patch to ensure that the scmi device is not used for setting up scmi handle after it's freed(fixes use after free). * tag 'scmi-fixes-4.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux: firmware: arm_scmi: Use after free in scmi_create_protocol_device() Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
| * | firmware: arm_scmi: Use after free in scmi_create_protocol_device()Dan Carpenter2018-05-081-0/+1
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We need to return here instead of setting up the freed sdev device as a transport. Fixes: 907b6d14911d ("firmware: arm_scmi: add per-protocol channels support using idr objects") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* / firmware: arm_scmi: remove redundant null check on arrayColin Ian King2018-04-161-1/+1
|/ | | | | | | | | | The null check on clk->name is redundant since name is a char array and can never be null, so the check is always true. Remove it. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1466117 ("Array compared against 0") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: prevent accessing rate_discrete uninitializedAnders Roxell2018-03-201-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | gcc-5.3 and earlier warns that rate_discrete maybe-uninitialized ../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:185:5: warning: 'rate_discrete' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] if (rate_discrete) ^ ../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:128:7: note: 'rate_discrete' was declared here bool rate_discrete; ^ This patch fixing the warning by initialising rate_discrete and also using goto label for the error path. Fixes: 5f6c6430e904 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol") Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> [sudeep.holla: added one line description to the commit message] Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add device power domain support using genpdSudeep Holla2018-02-282-0/+130
| | | | | | | | | This patch hooks up the support for device power domain provided by SCMI using the Linux generic power domain infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add per-protocol channels support using idr objectsSudeep Holla2018-02-281-12/+42
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to maintain the channel information per protocol, we need some sort of list or hashtable to hold all this information. IDR provides sparse array mapping of small integer ID numbers onto arbitrary pointers. In this case the arbitrary pointers can be pointers to the channel information. This patch adds support for per-protocol channels using those idr objects. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: refactor in preparation to support per-protocol channelsSudeep Holla2018-02-281-34/+56
| | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to support per-protocol channels if available, we need to factor out all the mailbox channel information(Tx/Rx payload and channel handle) out of the main SCMI instance information structure. This patch refactors the existing channel information into a separate chan_info structure. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add option for polling based performance domain operationsSudeep Holla2018-02-281-8/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to implement fast CPU DVFS switching, we need to perform all DVFS operations atomically. Since SCMI transfer already provide option to choose between pooling vs interrupt driven(default), we can opt for polling based transfers for set,get performance domain operations. This patch adds option to choose between polling vs interrupt driven SCMI transfers for set,get performance level operations. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add support for polling based SCMI transfersSudeep Holla2018-02-281-8/+47
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It would be useful to have options to perform some SCMI transfers atomically by polling for the completion flag instead of interrupt driven. The SCMI specification has option to disable the interrupt and poll for the completion flag in the shared memory. This patch adds support for polling based SCMI transfers using that option. This might be used for uninterrupted/atomic DVFS operations from the scheduler context. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: probe and initialise all the supported protocolsSudeep Holla2018-02-281-1/+50
| | | | | | | | | Now that we have basic support for all the protocols in the specification, let's probe them individually and initialise them. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for sensor protocolSudeep Holla2018-02-282-1/+292
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The sensor protocol provides functions to manage platform sensors, and provides the commands to describe the protocol version and the various attribute flags. It also provides commands to discover various sensors implemented and managed by the platform, read any sensor synchronously or asynchronously as allowed by the platform, program sensor attributes and/or configurations, if applicable. This patch adds support for most of the above features. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for power protocolSudeep Holla2018-02-282-1/+222
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The power protocol is intended for management of power states of various power domains. The power domain management protocol provides commands to describe the protocol version, discover the implementation specific attributes, set and get the power state of a domain. This patch adds support for the above mention features of the protocol. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> -- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/power.c | 242 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 28 +++++ 3 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/power.c
* firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocolSudeep Holla2018-02-282-1/+343
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The clock protocol is intended for management of clocks. It is used to enable or disable clocks, and to set and get the clock rates. This protocol provides commands to describe the protocol version, discover various implementation specific attributes, describe a clock, enable and disable a clock and get/set the rate of the clock synchronously or asynchronously. This patch adds initial support for the clock protocol. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocolSudeep Holla2018-02-283-1/+480
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The performance protocol is intended for the performance management of group(s) of device(s) that run in the same performance domain. It includes even the CPUs. A performance domain is defined by a set of devices that always have to run at the same performance level. For example, a set of CPUs that share a voltage domain, and have a common frequency control, is said to be in the same performance domain. The commands in this protocol provide functionality to describe the protocol version, describe various attribute flags, set and get the performance level of a domain. It also supports discovery of the list of performance levels supported by a performance domain, and the properties of each performance level. This patch adds basic support for the performance protocol. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devicesSudeep Holla2018-02-283-1/+224
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The SCMI specification encompasses various protocols. However, not every protocol has to be present on a given platform/implementation as not every protocol is relevant for it. Furthermore, the platform chooses which protocols it exposes to a given agent. The only protocol that must be implemented is the base protocol. The base protocol is used by an agent to discover which protocols are available to it. In order to enumerate the discovered implemented protocols, this patch adds support for a separate scmi protocol bus. It also adds mechanism to register support for different protocols. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocolSudeep Holla2018-02-284-1/+345
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The base protocol describes the properties of the implementation and provide generic error management. The base protocol provides commands to describe protocol version, discover implementation specific attributes and vendor/sub-vendor identification, list of protocols implemented and the various agents are in the system including OSPM and the platform. It also supports registering for notifications of platform errors. This protocol is mandatory. This patch adds support for the same along with some basic infrastructure to add support for other protocols. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
* firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMISudeep Holla2018-02-283-0/+746
The SCMI is intended to allow OSPM to manage various functions that are provided by the hardware platform it is running on, including power and performance functions. SCMI provides two levels of abstraction, protocols and transports. Protocols define individual groups of system control and management messages. A protocol specification describes the messages that it supports. Transports describe the method by which protocol messages are communicated between agents and the platform. This patch adds basic infrastructure to manage the message allocation, initialisation, packing/unpacking and shared memory management. Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>