summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuffViresh Kumar2017-12-071-94/+12
| | | | | | | | | | No one has used it for the last two and half years (since it was introduced by commit c36cf0717631 (thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power cooling device API), get rid of it. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpu_cooling: Keep only one of_cpufreq*cooling_register() helperViresh Kumar2017-12-071-26/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | of_cpufreq_cooling_register() isn't used by anyone and so can be removed, but then we would be left with two routines: cpufreq_cooling_register() and of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() that would look odd. Remove current implementation of of_cpufreq_cooling_register() and rename of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() as of_cpufreq_cooling_register(). This simplifies lots of stuff. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpu_cooling: Remove unused cpufreq_power_cooling_register()Viresh Kumar2017-12-071-30/+0
| | | | | | | | It isn't used by anyone, drop it. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpu_cooling: Make of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() parse DTViresh Kumar2017-12-071-18/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | All the callers of of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() have almost identical code and it makes more sense to move that code into the helper as its all about reading DT properties. This got rid of lot of redundant code. Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: pr_err() strings should end with newlinesArvind Yadav2017-10-311-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | pr_err() messages should end with a new-line to avoid other messages being concatenated. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Replace kmalloc with kmalloc_arrayViresh Kumar2017-05-271-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | Checkpatch reports following: WARNING: Prefer kmalloc_array over kmalloc with multiply + cpufreq_cdev->freq_table = kmalloc(sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev->freq_table) * i, Fix that. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Rearrange struct cpufreq_cooling_deviceViresh Kumar2017-05-271-7/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | This shrinks the size of the structure on arm64 by 8 bytes by avoiding padding of 4 bytes at two places. Also add missing doc comment for freq_table Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: 'freq' can't be zero in cpufreq_state2power()Viresh Kumar2017-05-271-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | The frequency table shouldn't have any zero frequency entries and so such a check isn't required. Though it would be better to make sure 'state' is within limits. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: don't store cpu_dev in cpufreq_cdevViresh Kumar2017-05-271-12/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | 'cpu_dev' is used by only one function, get_static_power(), and it wouldn't be time consuming to get the cpu device structure within it. This would help removing cpu_dev from struct cpufreq_cooling_device. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: get_level() can't failViresh Kumar2017-05-271-15/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | The frequency passed to get_level() is returned by cpu_power_to_freq() and it is guaranteed that get_level() can't fail. Get rid of error code. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: create structure for idle time statsViresh Kumar2017-05-271-28/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | We keep two arrays for idle time stats and allocate memory for them separately. It would be much easier to follow if we create an array of idle stats structure instead and allocate it once. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: merge frequency and power tablesViresh Kumar2017-05-271-86/+67
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The cpu_cooling driver keeps two tables: - freq_table: table of frequencies in descending order, built from policy->freq_table. - power_table: table of frequencies and power in ascending order, built from OPP table. If the OPPs are used for the CPU device then both these tables are actually built using the OPP core and should have the same frequency entries. And there is no need to keep separate tables for this. Lets merge them both. Note that the new table is in descending order of frequencies and so the 'for' loops were required to be fixed at few places to make it work. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of 'allowed_cpus'Viresh Kumar2017-05-271-56/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | 'allowed_cpus' is a copy of policy->related_cpus and can be replaced by it directly. At some places we are only concerned about online CPUs and policy->cpus can be used there. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: OPPs are registered for all CPUsViresh Kumar2017-05-271-15/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | The OPPs are registered for all CPUs of a cpufreq policy now and we don't need to run the loop in build_dyn_power_table(). Just check for the policy->cpu and we should be fine. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: store cpufreq policyViresh Kumar2017-05-271-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | The cpufreq policy can be used by the cpu_cooling driver, lets store it in the cpufreq_cooling_device structure. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* cpufreq: create cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries()Viresh Kumar2017-05-271-13/+9
| | | | | | | | | We need such a routine at two places already, lets create one. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: use cpufreq_policy to register cooling deviceViresh Kumar2017-05-271-38/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The CPU cooling driver uses the cpufreq policy, to get clip_cpus, the frequency table, etc. Most of the callers of CPU cooling driver's registration routines have the cpufreq policy with them, but they only pass the policy->related_cpus cpumask. The __cpufreq_cooling_register() routine then gets the policy by itself and uses it. It would be much better if the callers can pass the policy instead directly. This also fixes a basic design flaw, where the policy can be freed while the CPU cooling driver is still active. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: get rid of a variable in cpufreq_set_cur_state()Viresh Kumar2017-05-271-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | 'cpu' is used at only one place and there is no need to keep a separate variable for it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: remove cpufreq_cooling_get_level()Viresh Kumar2017-05-271-32/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | There is only one user of cpufreq_cooling_get_level() and that already has pointer to the cpufreq_cdev structure. It can directly call get_level() instead and we can get rid of cpufreq_cooling_get_level(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: replace cool_dev with cdevViresh Kumar2017-05-271-19/+18
| | | | | | | | | | Objects of "struct thermal_cooling_device" are named a bit inconsistently. Lets use cdev everywhere. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Name cpufreq cooling devices as cpufreq_cdevViresh Kumar2017-05-271-124/+124
| | | | | | | | | | | Objects of "struct cpufreq_cooling_device" are named a bit inconsistently. Lets use cpufreq_cdev everywhere. Also note that the lists containing such devices is renamed similarly too. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: rearrange globalsViresh Kumar2017-05-271-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Just to make it look better. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Avoid accessing potentially freed structuresViresh Kumar2017-05-271-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | After the lock is dropped, it is possible that the cpufreq_dev gets freed before we call get_level() and that can cause kernel to crash. Drop the lock after we are done using the structure. Cc: 4.2+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.2+ Fixes: 02373d7c69b4 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: fix lockdep problems in cpu_cooling") Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Check OPP for errorsViresh Kumar2017-03-131-2/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It is possible for dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact() to return errors. It was all fine earlier as dev_pm_opp_get_voltage() had a check within it to check for invalid OPPs, but dev_pm_opp_put() doesn't have any similar checks and the callers need to make sure OPP is valid before calling them. Also update the later dev_warn_ratelimited() to not print the error message as the OPP is guaranteed to be valid now. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Replace dev_warn with dev_errViresh Kumar2017-03-131-6/+6
| | | | | | | | There isn't much the user can do on seeing these warnings, as the hardware is actually okay. dev_err suits much better here. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
* thermal: Fix potential deadlock in cpu_coolingMatthew Wilcox2017-03-131-9/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | cooling_list_lock is covering not just cpufreq_dev_count, but also the calls to cpufreq_register_notifier() and cpufreq_unregister_notifier(). Since cooling_list_lock is also used within cpufreq_thermal_notifier(), lockdep reports a potential deadlock. Fix it by testing the condition under cooling_list_lock and dropping the lock before calling cpufreq_register_notifier(). And variable cpufreq_dev_count is removed at the same time, because it's no longer needed after the fix. Fixes: ae606089621e ("thermal: convert cpu_cooling to use an IDA") Reported-and-Tested-by: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
* Merge branch 'next' of ↵Linus Torvalds2017-03-011-65/+37
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux Pull thermal management updates from Zhang Rui: - add thermal driver for R-Car Gen3 thermal sensors. - add thermal driver for ZTE' zx2967 family thermal sensors. - convert thermal ID allocation from IDR to IDA. - fix a possible NULL dereference in imx thermal driver. - fix a ti-soc-thermal driver dependency issue so that critical thermal control is still available when CPU_THERMAL is not defined. - update binding information for QorIQ thermal driver. - a couple of cleanups in thermal core, intel_powerclamp, exynos, dra752-thermal, mtk-thermal driver. * 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux: powerpc/mpc85xx: Update TMU device tree node for T1023/T1024 powerpc/mpc85xx: Update TMU device tree node for T1040/T1042 dt-bindings: Update QorIQ TMU thermal bindings thermal: mtk_thermal: Staticise a number of data variables thermal: arm: dra752: Remove all TSHUT related definitions thermal: arm: dra752: Remove TSHUT configuration thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Remove CPU_THERMAL Dependency from TI_THERMAL thermal: imx: Fix possible NULL dereference. thermal: exynos: Remove parsing unused samsung,tmu_cal_mode property thermal: zx2967: add thermal driver for ZTE's zx2967 family thermal: use cpumask_var_t for on-stack cpu masks dt: bindings: add documentation for zx2967 family thermal sensor thermal/intel_powerclamp: Remove set-but-not-used variables thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Add R-Car Gen3 thermal driver thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Document the R-Car Gen3 thermal: convert devfreq_cooling to use an IDA thermal: convert cpu_cooling to use an IDA thermal: convert clock cooling to use an IDA thermal core: convert ID allocation to IDA
| *-. Merge branches 'thermal-core', 'thermal-soc', 'thermal-intel' and ↵Zhang Rui2017-02-221-52/+11
| |\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | 'ida-conversion' into next
| | | * thermal: convert cpu_cooling to use an IDAMatthew Wilcox2017-01-041-52/+11
| | |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | thermal cpu cooling does not use the ability to look up pointers by ID, so convert it from using an IDR to the more space-efficient IDA. The cooling_cpufreq_lock was being used to protect cpufreq_dev_count as well as the IDR. Rather than keep the mutex to protect a single integer, I expanded the scope of cooling_list_lock to also cover cpufreq_dev_count. We could also convert cpufreq_dev_count into an atomic. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
| * / thermal: use cpumask_var_t for on-stack cpu masksArnd Bergmann2017-02-101-13/+26
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Putting a bare cpumask structure on the stack produces a warning on large SMP configurations: drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c: In function 'cpufreq_state2power': drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:644:1: warning: the frame size of 1056 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c: In function '__cpufreq_cooling_register': drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:898:1: warning: the frame size of 1104 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] The recommended workaround is to use cpumask_var_t, which behaves just like a normal cpu mask in most cases, but turns into a dynamic allocation when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is set. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
* / PM / OPP: Update OPP users to put referenceViresh Kumar2017-01-301-9/+2
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch updates dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to get a reference to the OPPs returned by them. Also updates the users of dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to call dev_pm_opp_put() after they are done using the OPPs. As it is guaranteed the that OPPs wouldn't get freed while being used, the RCU read side locking present with the users isn't required anymore. Drop it as well. This patch also updates all users of devfreq_recommended_opp() which was returning an OPP received from the OPP core. Note that some of the OPP core routines have gained rcu_read_{lock|unlock}() calls, as those still use RCU specific APIs within them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> [Devfreq] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Fix wrong comment call function nameHugh Kang2016-09-271-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | The last_load is updated not cpufreq_get_actual_power() function call but cpufreq_get_requested_power() function call. Signed-off-by: Inhyuk Kang <hugh.kang@lge.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Fix NULL dereference in cpufreq_state2powerBrendan Jackman2016-08-191-5/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently all CPU cooling devices share a `struct thermal_cooling_device_ops` instance. The thermal core uses the presence of functions in this struct to determine if a cooling device has a power model (see cdev_is_power_actor). cpu_cooling.c adds the power model functions to the shared struct when a device is registered with a power model. Therefore, if a CPU cooling device is registered using [of_]cpufreq_power_cooling_register, _all_ devices will be determined to have a power model, including any registered with [of_]cpufreq_cooling_register. This can result in cpufreq_state2power being called on a device where dyn_power_table is NULL. With this commit, instead of having a shared thermal_cooling_device_ops which is mutated, we have two versions: one with the power functions and one without. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
* Merge back earlier cpufreq changes for v4.8.Rafael J. Wysocki2016-06-131-5/+19
|\
| * cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_frequency_get_table()Viresh Kumar2016-06-091-5/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Most of the callers of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() already have the pointer to a valid 'policy' structure and they don't really need to go through the per-cpu variable first and then a check to validate the frequency, in order to find the freq-table for the policy. Directly use the policy->freq_table field instead for them. Only one user of that API is left after above changes, cpu_cooling.c and it accesses the freq_table in a racy way as the policy can get freed in between. Fix it by using cpufreq_cpu_get() properly. Since there are no more users of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() left, get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> (cpu_cooling.c) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* | thermal: cpu_cooling: fix improper order during initializationLukasz Luba2016-06-011-8/+8
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The freq_table array is not populated before calling thermal_of_cooling_register. The code which populates the freq table was introduced in commit f6859014. This should be done before registering new thermal cooling device. The log shows effects of this wrong decision. [ 2.172614] cpu cpu1: Failed to get voltage for frequency 1984518656000: -34 [ 2.220863] cpu cpu0: Failed to get voltage for frequency 1984524416000: -34 Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.19+ Fixes: f6859014c7e7 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Store frequencies in descending order") Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: fix out of bounds access in time_in_idleJavi Merino2016-02-111-6/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In __cpufreq_cooling_register() we allocate the arrays for time_in_idle and time_in_idle_timestamp to be as big as the number of cpus in this cpufreq device. However, in get_load() we access this array using the cpu number as index, which can result in an out of bound access. Index time_in_idle{,_timestamp} using the index in the cpufreq_device's allowed_cpus mask, as we do for the load_cpu array in cpufreq_get_requested_power() Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Tested-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Remove usage of devm functionsVaishali Thakkar2015-10-101-5/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | In the function cpufreq_get_requested_power, the memory allocated for load_cpu is live within the function only. And after the allocation it is immediately freed with devm_kfree. There is no need to allocate memory for load_cpu with devm function so replace devm_kcalloc with kcalloc and devm_kfree with kfree. Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: free power table on error or when unregisteringJavi Merino2015-09-131-5/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | The power table is not being freed on error from cpufreq_cooling register or when unregistering. Free it. Fixes: c36cf0717631 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power cooling device API") Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: don't call kcalloc() under rcu_read_lockJavi Merino2015-09-131-24/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | build_dyn_power_table() allocates the power table while holding rcu_read_lock. kcalloc using GFP_KERNEL may sleep, so it can't be called in an RCU read-side path. Move the rcu protection to the part of the function that really needs it: the part that handles the dev_pm_opp pointer received from dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(). In the unlikely case that there is an OPP added to the cpu while this function is running, return -EAGAIN. Fixes: c36cf0717631 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power cooling device API") Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal/cpu_cooling: update policy limits if clipped_freq < policy->maxViresh Kumar2015-08-141-1/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | policy->max is the maximum allowed frequency defined by user and clipped_freq is the maximum that thermal constraints allow. If clipped_freq is lower than policy->max, then we need to readjust policy->max. But, if clipped_freq is greater than policy->max, we don't need to do anything. We used to call cpufreq_verify_within_limits() in this case, but it doesn't change anything in this case. Lets skip this unnecessary call and write a comment that explains this. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal/cpu_cooling: rename max_freq as clipped_freq in notifierViresh Kumar2015-08-141-4/+4
| | | | | | | That's what it is for, lets name it properly. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal/cpu_cooling: rename cpufreq_val as clipped_freqViresh Kumar2015-08-141-5/+5
| | | | | | | That's what it is for, lets name it properly. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal/cpu_cooling: convert 'switch' block to 'if' block in notifierViresh Kumar2015-08-141-16/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | We just need to take care of single event here and there is no need to increase indentation level of most of the code (which causes lines longer that 80 columns to break). Kill the switch block. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal/cpu_cooling: quit early after updating policyViresh Kumar2015-08-141-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | If a valid cpufreq_dev is found for policy->cpu, we should update the policy and quit the for loop. There is no need to keep traversing the list of cpufreq_dev's. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal/cpu_cooling: No need to initialize max_freq to 0Viresh Kumar2015-08-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | Its always set before getting used, don't initialize it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: fix lockdep problems in cpu_coolingRussell King2015-08-141-11/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A recent change to the cpu_cooling code introduced a AB-BA deadlock scenario between the cpufreq_policy_notifier_list rwsem and the cooling_cpufreq_lock. This is caused by cooling_cpufreq_lock being held before the registration/removal of the notifier block (an operation which takes the rwsem), and the notifier code itself which takes the locks in the reverse order: ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.18.0+ #1453 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- rc.local/770 is trying to acquire lock: (cooling_cpufreq_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c04abfc4>] cpufreq_thermal_notifier+0x34/0xfc but task is already holding lock: ((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<c0042f04>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x34/0x68 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 ((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}: [<c06bc3b0>] down_write+0x44/0x9c [<c0043444>] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x28/0xd8 [<c04ad610>] cpufreq_register_notifier+0x68/0x90 [<c04abe4c>] __cpufreq_cooling_register.part.1+0x120/0x180 [<c04abf44>] __cpufreq_cooling_register+0x98/0xa4 [<c04abf8c>] cpufreq_cooling_register+0x18/0x1c [<bf0046f8>] imx_thermal_probe+0x1c0/0x470 [imx_thermal] [<c037cef8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xac [<c037b710>] driver_probe_device+0x114/0x234 [<c037b8cc>] __driver_attach+0x9c/0xa0 [<c0379d68>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0x90 [<c037b204>] driver_attach+0x24/0x28 [<c037ae7c>] bus_add_driver+0xe0/0x1d8 [<c037c0cc>] driver_register+0x80/0xfc [<c037cd80>] __platform_driver_register+0x50/0x64 [<bf007018>] 0xbf007018 [<c0008a5c>] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x1d8 [<c0095da4>] load_module+0x1768/0x1ef8 [<c0096614>] SyS_init_module+0xe0/0xf4 [<c000ec00>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48 -> #0 (cooling_cpufreq_lock){+.+.+.}: [<c00619f8>] lock_acquire+0xb0/0x124 [<c06ba3b4>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5c/0x3d8 [<c04abfc4>] cpufreq_thermal_notifier+0x34/0xfc [<c0042bf4>] notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x8c [<c0042f20>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x50/0x68 [<c0042f58>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28 [<c04ae62c>] cpufreq_set_policy+0x7c/0x1d0 [<c04af3cc>] store_scaling_governor+0x74/0x9c [<c04ad418>] store+0x90/0xc0 [<c0175384>] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x58 [<c01746b4>] kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190 [<c010dcc0>] vfs_write+0xac/0x1b4 [<c010dfec>] SyS_write+0x44/0x90 [<c000ec00>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem); lock(cooling_cpufreq_lock); lock((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem); lock(cooling_cpufreq_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 7 locks held by rc.local/770: #0: (sb_writers#6){.+.+.+}, at: [<c010dda0>] vfs_write+0x18c/0x1b4 #1: (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0174678>] kernfs_fop_write+0xa0/0x190 #2: (s_active#52){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0174680>] kernfs_fop_write+0xa8/0x190 #3: (cpu_hotplug.lock){++++++}, at: [<c0026a60>] get_online_cpus+0x34/0x90 #4: (cpufreq_rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<c04ad3e0>] store+0x58/0xc0 #5: (&policy->rwsem){+.+.+.}, at: [<c04ad3f8>] store+0x70/0xc0 #6: ((cpufreq_policy_notifier_list).rwsem){++++.+}, at: [<c0042f04>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x34/0x68 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 770 Comm: rc.local Not tainted 3.18.0+ #1453 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) Backtrace: [<c00121c8>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c0012360>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c) r6:c0b85a80 r5:c0b75630 r4:00000000 r3:00000000 [<c0012348>] (show_stack) from [<c06b6c48>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x98) [<c06b6bcc>] (dump_stack) from [<c06b42a4>] (print_circular_bug+0x28c/0x2d8) r4:c0b85a80 r3:d0071d40 [<c06b4018>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c00613b0>] (__lock_acquire+0x1acc/0x1bb0) r10:c0b50660 r8:c09e6d80 r7:d0071d40 r6:c11d0f0c r5:00000007 r4:d0072240 [<c005f8e4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c00619f8>] (lock_acquire+0xb0/0x124) r10:00000000 r9:c04abfc4 r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:c0a06f0c r4:00000000 [<c0061948>] (lock_acquire) from [<c06ba3b4>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x5c/0x3d8) r10:ec853800 r9:c0a06ed4 r8:d0071d40 r7:c0a06ed4 r6:c11d0f0c r5:00000000 r4:c04abfc4 [<c06ba358>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c04abfc4>] (cpufreq_thermal_notifier+0x34/0xfc) r10:ec853800 r9:ec85380c r8:d00d7d3c r7:c0a06ed4 r6:d00d7d3c r5:00000000 r4:fffffffe [<c04abf90>] (cpufreq_thermal_notifier) from [<c0042bf4>] (notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x8c) r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:00000000 r4:fffffffe [<c0042ba8>] (notifier_call_chain) from [<c0042f20>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x50/0x68) r8:c0a072a4 r7:00000000 r6:d00d7d3c r5:ffffffff r4:c0a06fc8 r3:ffffffff [<c0042ed0>] (__blocking_notifier_call_chain) from [<c0042f58>] (blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28) r7:ec98b540 r6:c13ebc80 r5:ed76e600 r4:d00d7d3c [<c0042f38>] (blocking_notifier_call_chain) from [<c04ae62c>] (cpufreq_set_policy+0x7c/0x1d0) [<c04ae5b0>] (cpufreq_set_policy) from [<c04af3cc>] (store_scaling_governor+0x74/0x9c) r7:ec98b540 r6:0000000c r5:ec98b540 r4:ed76e600 [<c04af358>] (store_scaling_governor) from [<c04ad418>] (store+0x90/0xc0) r6:0000000c r5:ed76e6d4 r4:ed76e600 [<c04ad388>] (store) from [<c0175384>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x58) r8:0000000c r7:d00d7f78 r6:ec98b540 r5:0000000c r4:ec853800 r3:0000000c [<c0175330>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c01746b4>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190) r6:ec98b540 r5:00000000 r4:00000000 r3:c0175330 [<c01745d8>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c010dcc0>] (vfs_write+0xac/0x1b4) r10:0162aa70 r9:d00d6000 r8:0000000c r7:d00d7f78 r6:0162aa70 r5:0000000c r4:eccde500 [<c010dc14>] (vfs_write) from [<c010dfec>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x90) r10:0162aa70 r8:0000000c r7:eccde500 r6:eccde500 r5:00000000 r4:00000000 [<c010dfa8>] (SyS_write) from [<c000ec00>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48) r10:00000000 r8:c000edc4 r7:00000004 r6:000216cc r5:0000000c r4:0162aa70 Solve this by moving to finer grained locking - use one mutex to protect the cpufreq_dev_list as a whole, and a separate lock to ensure correct ordering of cpufreq notifier registration and removal. cooling_list_lock is taken within cooling_cpufreq_lock on (un)registration to preserve the behavior of the code, i.e. to atomically add/remove to the list and (un)register the notifier. Fixes: 2dcd851fe4b4 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Update always cpufreq policy with Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Fix power calculation when CPUs are offlineKapileshwar Singh2015-05-041-1/+12
| | | | | | | | | | Ensure that the CPU for which the frequency is being requested is online. If none of the CPUs are online the requested power is returned as 0. Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Kapileshwar Singh <kapileshwar.singh@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Remove cpu_dev update on policy CPU updateKapileshwar Singh2015-05-041-40/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It was initially understood that an update to the cpu_device (cached in cpufreq_cooling_device) was required to ascertain the correct operating point of the device on a cpufreq policy->cpu update or creation or deletion of a cpufreq policy. (e.g. when the existing policy CPU goes offline). This update is not required and it is possible to ascertain the OPPs from the leading CPU in a cpufreq domain even if the CPU is hotplugged out. Fixes: e0128d8ab423 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power cooling device API") Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Kapileshwar Singh <kapileshwar.singh@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* thermal: cpu_cooling: Check memory allocation of power_tableJavi Merino2015-05-041-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | We allocate the power_table in memory but we don't test whether the allocation succeeded. Return -ENOMEM if kcalloc() fails. Fixes: e0128d8ab423 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: implement the power cooling device API") Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-13 00:41:09 +0000