summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/btrfs/space-info.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* btrfs: shrink delalloc pages instead of full inodesJosef Bacik2021-01-081-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 38d715f494f2 ("btrfs: use btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in shrink_delalloc") cleaned up how we do delalloc shrinking by utilizing some infrastructure we have in place to flush inodes that we use for device replace and snapshot. However this introduced a pretty serious performance regression. To reproduce the user untarred the source tarball of Firefox (360MiB xz compressed/1.5GiB uncompressed), and would see it take anywhere from 5 to 20 times as long to untar in 5.10 compared to 5.9. This was observed on fast devices (SSD and better) and not on HDD. The root cause is because before we would generally use the normal writeback path to reclaim delalloc space, and for this we would provide it with the number of pages we wanted to flush. The referenced commit changed this to flush that many inodes, which drastically increased the amount of space we were flushing in certain cases, which severely affected performance. We cannot revert this patch unfortunately because of 3d45f221ce62 ("btrfs: fix deadlock when cloning inline extent and low on free metadata space") which requires the ability to skip flushing inodes that are being cloned in certain scenarios, which means we need to keep using our flushing infrastructure or risk re-introducing the deadlock. Instead to fix this problem we can go back to providing btrfs_start_delalloc_roots with a number of pages to flush, and then set up a writeback_control and utilize sync_inode() to handle the flushing for us. This gives us the same behavior we had prior to the fix, while still allowing us to avoid the deadlock that was fixed by Filipe. I redid the users original test and got the following results on one of our test machines (256GiB of ram, 56 cores, 2TiB Intel NVMe drive) 5.9 0m54.258s 5.10 1m26.212s 5.10+patch 0m38.800s 5.10+patch is significantly faster than plain 5.9 because of my patch series "Change data reservations to use the ticketing infra" which contained the patch that introduced the regression, but generally improved the overall ENOSPC flushing mechanisms. Additional testing on consumer-grade SSD (8GiB ram, 8 CPU) confirm the results: 5.10.5 4m00s 5.10.5+patch 1m08s 5.11-rc2 5m14s 5.11-rc2+patch 1m30s Reported-by: René Rebe <rene@exactcode.de> Fixes: 38d715f494f2 ("btrfs: use btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in shrink_delalloc") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10 Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add my test results ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: fix deadlock when cloning inline extent and low on free metadata spaceFilipe Manana2020-12-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When cloning an inline extent there are cases where we can not just copy the inline extent from the source range to the target range (e.g. when the target range starts at an offset greater than zero). In such cases we copy the inline extent's data into a page of the destination inode and then dirty that page. However, after that we will need to start a transaction for each processed extent and, if we are ever low on available metadata space, we may need to flush existing delalloc for all dirty inodes in an attempt to release metadata space - if that happens we may deadlock: * the async reclaim task queued a delalloc work to flush delalloc for the destination inode of the clone operation; * the task executing that delalloc work gets blocked waiting for the range with the dirty page to be unlocked, which is currently locked by the task doing the clone operation; * the async reclaim task blocks waiting for the delalloc work to complete; * the cloning task is waiting on the waitqueue of its reservation ticket while holding the range with the dirty page locked in the inode's io_tree; * if metadata space is not released by some other task (like delalloc for some other inode completing for example), the clone task waits forever and as a consequence the delalloc work and async reclaim tasks will hang forever as well. Releasing more space on the other hand may require starting a transaction, which will hang as well when trying to reserve metadata space, resulting in a deadlock between all these tasks. When this happens, traces like the following show up in dmesg/syslog: [87452.323003] INFO: task kworker/u16:11:1810830 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [87452.323644] Tainted: G B W 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 [87452.324248] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [87452.324852] task:kworker/u16:11 state:D stack: 0 pid:1810830 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [87452.325520] Workqueue: btrfs-flush_delalloc btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [87452.326136] Call Trace: [87452.326737] __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 [87452.327390] schedule+0x45/0xe0 [87452.328174] lock_extent_bits+0x1e6/0x2d0 [btrfs] [87452.328894] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [87452.329474] btrfs_invalidatepage+0x32c/0x390 [btrfs] [87452.330133] ? __mod_memcg_state+0x8e/0x160 [87452.330738] __extent_writepage+0x2d4/0x400 [btrfs] [87452.331405] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b2/0x500 [btrfs] [87452.332007] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 [87452.332557] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xf0 [87452.333127] extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] [87452.333653] ? lock_acquire+0x1a3/0x490 [87452.334177] do_writepages+0x43/0xe0 [87452.334699] ? __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xa4/0x100 [87452.335720] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xc5/0x100 [87452.336500] btrfs_run_delalloc_work+0x17/0x40 [btrfs] [87452.337216] btrfs_work_helper+0xf1/0x600 [btrfs] [87452.337838] process_one_work+0x24e/0x5e0 [87452.338437] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [87452.339137] ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [87452.339884] kthread+0x153/0x170 [87452.340507] ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 [87452.341153] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [87452.341806] INFO: task kworker/u16:1:2426217 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [87452.342487] Tainted: G B W 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 [87452.343274] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [87452.344049] task:kworker/u16:1 state:D stack: 0 pid:2426217 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [87452.344974] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs] [87452.345655] Call Trace: [87452.346305] __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 [87452.346947] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [87452.347676] ? wait_for_completion+0x81/0x110 [87452.348389] schedule+0x45/0xe0 [87452.349077] schedule_timeout+0x30c/0x580 [87452.349718] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [87452.350340] ? lock_acquire+0x1a3/0x490 [87452.351006] ? try_to_wake_up+0x7a/0xa20 [87452.351541] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 [87452.352040] ? lock_acquired+0x199/0x490 [87452.352517] ? wait_for_completion+0x81/0x110 [87452.353000] wait_for_completion+0xab/0x110 [87452.353490] start_delalloc_inodes+0x2af/0x390 [btrfs] [87452.353973] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x12d/0x250 [btrfs] [87452.354455] flush_space+0x24f/0x660 [btrfs] [87452.355063] btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x1bb/0x480 [btrfs] [87452.355565] process_one_work+0x24e/0x5e0 [87452.356024] worker_thread+0x20f/0x3b0 [87452.356487] ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 [87452.356973] kthread+0x153/0x170 [87452.357434] ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 [87452.357880] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 (...) < stack traces of several tasks waiting for the locks of the inodes of the clone operation > (...) [92867.444138] RSP: 002b:00007ffc3371bbe8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000052 [92867.444624] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc3371bea0 RCX: 00007f61efe73f97 [92867.445116] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000560fbd5d7a40 RDI: 0000560fbd5d8960 [92867.445595] RBP: 00007ffc3371beb0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 [92867.446070] R10: 00007ffc3371b996 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [92867.446820] R13: 000000000000001f R14: 00007ffc3371bea0 R15: 00007ffc3371beb0 [92867.447361] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:2508238 ppid:2508153 flags:0x00004000 [92867.447920] Call Trace: [92867.448435] __schedule+0x5d1/0xcf0 [92867.448934] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [92867.449423] schedule+0x45/0xe0 [92867.449916] __reserve_bytes+0x4a4/0xb10 [btrfs] [92867.450576] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [92867.451202] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x29/0x190 [btrfs] [92867.451815] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [92867.452412] start_transaction+0x2d1/0x760 [btrfs] [92867.453216] clone_copy_inline_extent+0x333/0x490 [btrfs] [92867.453848] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 [92867.454539] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x9a7/0xc30 [btrfs] [92867.455218] btrfs_clone+0x569/0x7e0 [btrfs] [92867.455952] btrfs_clone_files+0xf6/0x150 [btrfs] [92867.456588] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x324/0x3d0 [btrfs] [92867.457213] do_clone_file_range+0xd4/0x1f0 [92867.457828] vfs_clone_file_range+0x4d/0x230 [92867.458355] ? lock_release+0x20e/0x4c0 [92867.458890] ioctl_file_clone+0x8f/0xc0 [92867.459377] do_vfs_ioctl+0x342/0x750 [92867.459913] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x62/0xb0 [92867.460377] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [92867.460842] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 (...) < stack traces of more tasks blocked on metadata reservation like the clone task above, because the async reclaim task has deadlocked > (...) Another thing to notice is that the worker task that is deadlocked when trying to flush the destination inode of the clone operation is at btrfs_invalidatepage(). This is simply because the clone operation has a destination offset greater than the i_size and we only update the i_size of the destination file after cloning an extent (just like we do in the buffered write path). Since the async reclaim path uses btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() to trigger the flushing of delalloc for all inodes that have delalloc, add a runtime flag to an inode to signal it should not be flushed, and for inodes with that flag set, start_delalloc_inodes() will simply skip them. When the cloning code needs to dirty a page to copy an inline extent, set that flag on the inode and then clear it when the clone operation finishes. This could be sporadically triggered with test case generic/269 from fstests, which exercises many fsstress processes running in parallel with several dd processes filling up the entire filesystem. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9+ Fixes: 05a5a7621ce6 ("Btrfs: implement full reflink support for inline extents") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: kill the RCU protection for fs_info->space_infoJosef Bacik2020-10-071-10/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | We have this thing wrapped in an RCU lock, but it's really not needed. We create all the space_info's on mount, and we destroy them on unmount. The list never changes and we're protected from messing with it by the normal mount/umount path, so kill the RCU stuff around it. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: remove unused function calc_global_rsv_need_space()YueHaibing2020-10-071-5/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | It is not used since commit 0096420adb03 ("btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit"). Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: fix possible infinite loop in data async reclaimJosef Bacik2020-10-071-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Dave reported an issue where generic/102 would sometimes hang. This turned out to be because we'd get into this spot where we were no longer making progress on data reservations because our exit condition was not met. The log is basically while (!space_info->full && !list_empty(&space_info->tickets)) flush_space(space_info, flush_state); where flush state is our various flush states, but doesn't include ALLOC_CHUNK_FORCE. This is because we actually lead with allocating chunks, and so the assumption was that once you got to the actual flushing states you could no longer allocate chunks. This was a stupid assumption, because you could have deleted block groups that would be reclaimed by a transaction commit, thus unsetting space_info->full. This is essentially what happens with generic/102, and so sometimes you'd get stuck in the flushing loop because we weren't allocating chunks, but flushing space wasn't giving us what we needed to make progress. Fix this by adding ALLOC_CHUNK_FORCE to the end of our flushing states, that way we will eventually bail out because we did end up with space_info->full if we free'd a chunk previously. Otherwise, as is the case for this test, we'll allocate our chunk and continue on our happy merry way. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: add a comment explaining the data flush stepsJosef Bacik2020-10-071-0/+47
| | | | | | | | | | | The data flushing steps are not obvious to people other than myself and Chris. Write a giant comment explaining the reasoning behind each flush step for data as well as why it is in that particular order. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: do async reclaim for data reservationsJosef Bacik2020-10-071-33/+84
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that we have the data ticketing stuff in place, move normal data reservations to use an async reclaim helper to satisfy tickets. Before we could have multiple tasks race in and both allocate chunks, resulting in more data chunks than we would necessarily need. Serializing these allocations and making a single thread responsible for flushing will only allocate chunks as needed, as well as cut down on transaction commits and other flush related activities. Priority reservations will still work as they have before, simply trying to allocate a chunk until they can make their reservation. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: flush delayed refs when trying to reserve data spaceJosef Bacik2020-10-071-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | We can end up with freed extents in the delayed refs, and thus may_commit_transaction() may not think we have enough pinned space to commit the transaction and we'll ENOSPC early. Handle this by running the delayed refs in order to make sure pinned is uptodate before we try to commit the transaction. Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: run delayed iputs before committing the transaction for dataJosef Bacik2020-10-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before we were waiting on iputs after we committed the transaction, but this doesn't really make much sense. We want to reclaim any space we may have in order to be more likely to commit the transaction, due to pinned space being added by running the delayed iputs. Fix this by making delayed iputs run before committing the transaction. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: don't force commit if we are dataJosef Bacik2020-10-071-18/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We used to unconditionally commit the transaction at least 2 times and then on the 3rd try check against pinned space to make sure committing the transaction was worth the effort. This is overkill, we know nobody is going to steal our reservation, and if we can't make our reservation with the pinned amount simply bail out. This also cleans up the passing of bytes_needed to may_commit_transaction, as that was the thing we added into place in order to accomplish this behavior. We no longer need it so remove that mess. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: drop the commit_cycles stuff for data reservationsJosef Bacik2020-10-071-19/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was an old wart left over from how we previously did data reservations. Before we could have people race in and take a reservation while we were flushing space, so we needed to make sure we looped a few times before giving up. Now that we're using the ticketing infrastructure we don't have to worry about this and can drop the logic altogether. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: use the same helper for data and metadata reservationsJosef Bacik2020-10-071-33/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that data reservations follow the same pattern as metadata reservations we can simply rename __reserve_metadata_bytes to __reserve_bytes and use that helper for data reservations. Things to keep in mind, btrfs_can_overcommit() returns 0 for data, because we can never overcommit. We also will never pass in FLUSH_ALL for data, so we'll simply be added to the priority list and go straight into handle_reserve_ticket. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: serialize data reservations if we are flushingJosef Bacik2020-10-071-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nikolay reported a problem where generic/371 would fail sometimes with a slow drive. The gist of the test is that we fallocate a file in parallel with a pwrite of a different file. These two files combined are smaller than the file system, but sometimes the pwrite would ENOSPC. A fair bit of investigation uncovered the fact that the fallocate workload was racing in and grabbing the free space that the pwrite workload was trying to free up so it could make its own reservation. After a few loops of this eventually the pwrite workload would error out with an ENOSPC. We've had the same problem with metadata as well, and we serialized all metadata allocations to satisfy this problem. This wasn't usually a problem with data because data reservations are more straightforward, but obviously could still happen. Fix this by not allowing reservations to occur if there are any pending tickets waiting to be satisfied on the space info. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: use ticketing for data space reservationsJosef Bacik2020-10-071-58/+64
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that we have all the infrastructure in place, use the ticketing infrastructure to make data allocations. This still maintains the exact same flushing behavior, but now we're using tickets to get our reservations satisfied. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: add btrfs_reserve_data_bytes and use itJosef Bacik2020-10-071-0/+92
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Create a new function btrfs_reserve_data_bytes() in order to handle data reservations. This uses the new flush types and flush states to handle making data reservations. This patch specifically does not change any functionality, and is purposefully not cleaned up in order to make bisection easier for the future patches. The new helper is identical to the old helper in how it handles data reservations. We first try to force a chunk allocation, and then we run through the flush states all at once and in the same order that they were done with the old helper. Subsequent patches will clean this up and change the behavior of the flushing, and it is important to keep those changes separate so we can easily bisect down to the patch that caused the regression, rather than the patch that made us start using the new infrastructure. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: add the data transaction commit logic into may_commit_transactionJosef Bacik2020-10-071-7/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Data space flushing currently unconditionally commits the transaction twice in a row, and the last time it checks if there's enough pinned extents to satisfy its reservation before deciding to commit the transaction for the 3rd and final time. Encode this logic into may_commit_transaction(). In the next patch we will pass in U64_MAX for bytes_needed the first two times, and the final time we will pass in the actual bytes we need so the normal logic will apply. This patch exists solely to make the logical changes I will make to the flushing state machine separate to make it easier to bisect any performance related regressions. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: add flushing states for handling data reservationsJosef Bacik2020-10-071-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently the way we do data reservations is by seeing if we have enough space in our space_info. If we do not and we're a normal inode we'll 1) Attempt to force a chunk allocation until we can't anymore. 2) If that fails we'll flush delalloc, then commit the transaction, then run the delayed iputs. If we are a free space inode we're only allowed to force a chunk allocation. In order to use the normal flushing mechanism we need to encode this into a flush state array for normal inodes. Since both will start with allocating chunks until the space info is full there is no need to add this as a flush state, this will be handled specially. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: check tickets after waiting on ordered extentsJosef Bacik2020-10-071-8/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Right now if the space is freed up after the ordered extents complete (which is likely since the reservations are held until they complete), we would do extra delalloc flushing before we'd notice that we didn't have any more tickets. Fix this by moving the tickets check after our wait_ordered_extents check. Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: use btrfs_start_delalloc_roots in shrink_delallocJosef Bacik2020-10-071-54/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The original iteration of flushing had us flushing delalloc and then checking to see if we could make our reservation, thus we were very careful about how many pages we would flush at once. But now that everything is async and we satisfy tickets as the space becomes available we don't have to keep track of any of this, simply try and flush the number of dirty inodes we may have in order to reclaim space to make our reservation. This cleans up our delalloc flushing significantly. The async_pages stuff is dropped because btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() handles the case that we generate async extents for us, so we no longer require this extra logic. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: make ALLOC_CHUNK use the space info flagsJosef Bacik2020-10-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have traditionally used flush_space() to flush metadata space, so we've been unconditionally using btrfs_metadata_alloc_profile() for our profile to allocate a chunk. However if we're going to use this for data we need to use btrfs_get_alloc_profile() on the space_info we pass in. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: make shrink_delalloc take space_info as an argJosef Bacik2020-10-071-5/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently shrink_delalloc just looks up the metadata space info, but this won't work if we're trying to reclaim space for data chunks. We get the right space_info we want passed into flush_space, so simply pass that along to shrink_delalloc. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: handle U64_MAX for shrink_delallocJosef Bacik2020-10-071-3/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | Data allocations are going to want to pass in U64_MAX for flushing space, adjust shrink_delalloc to handle this properly. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: remove orig from shrink_delallocJosef Bacik2020-10-071-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | We don't use this anywhere inside of shrink_delalloc since 17024ad0a0fd ("Btrfs: fix early ENOSPC due to delalloc"), remove it. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: change nr to u64 in btrfs_start_delalloc_rootsJosef Bacik2020-10-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We have btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() which takes a u64 for nr, but btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() that takes an int for nr, which makes using them in conjunction, especially for something like (u64)-1, annoying and inconsistent. Fix btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() to take a u64 for nr and adjust start_delalloc_inodes() and it's callers appropriately. This means we've adjusted start_delalloc_inodes() to take a pointer of nr since we want to preserve the ability for start-delalloc_inodes() to return an error, so simply make it do the nr adjusting as necessary. Part of adjusting the callers to this means changing btrfs_writeback_inodes_sb_nr() to take a u64 for items. This may be confusing because it seems unrelated, but the caller of btrfs_writeback_inodes_sb_nr() already passes in a u64, it's just the function variable that needs to be changed. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: fix lockdep splat from btrfs_dump_space_infoJosef Bacik2020-07-271-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When running with -o enospc_debug you can get the following splat if one of the dump_space_info's trip ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc5+ #20 Tainted: G OE ------------------------------------------------------ dd/563090 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9e7dbf4f1e18 (&ctl->tree_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff9e7e2284d428 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_dump_space_info+0xaa/0x120 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x3c/0x3c0 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0x7ef/0x13b0 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xc1/0x340 [btrfs] alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 [btrfs] __btrfs_cow_block+0x122/0x530 [btrfs] btrfs_cow_block+0x106/0x210 [btrfs] commit_cowonly_roots+0x55/0x300 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4ed/0xac0 [btrfs] sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0x70 cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160 task_work_run+0x5f/0x90 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bd/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x5e/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&space_info->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1a6/0x3f0 [btrfs] btrfs_inode_rsv_release+0x4f/0x170 [btrfs] btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent+0x155/0x480 [btrfs] clear_state_bit+0x81/0x1a0 [btrfs] __clear_extent_bit+0x25c/0x5d0 [btrfs] clear_extent_bit+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_invalidatepage+0x2b7/0x3c0 [btrfs] truncate_cleanup_page+0x47/0xe0 truncate_inode_pages_range+0x238/0x840 truncate_pagecache+0x44/0x60 btrfs_setattr+0x202/0x5e0 [btrfs] notify_change+0x33b/0x490 do_truncate+0x76/0xd0 path_openat+0x687/0xa10 do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 do_sys_openat2+0x215/0x2d0 do_sys_open+0x44/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&tree->lock#2){+.+.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 find_first_extent_bit+0x32/0x150 [btrfs] write_pinned_extent_entries.isra.0+0xc5/0x100 [btrfs] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x172/0x480 [btrfs] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x7a/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x286/0x3b0 [btrfs] commit_cowonly_roots+0x245/0x300 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4ed/0xac0 [btrfs] close_ctree+0xf9/0x2f5 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0x70 cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160 task_work_run+0x5f/0x90 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bd/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x5e/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&ctl->tree_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: __lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460 lock_acquire+0xab/0x360 _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_dump_space_info+0xf4/0x120 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x176/0x180 [btrfs] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x145/0x550 [btrfs] cache_save_setup+0x28d/0x3b0 [btrfs] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1fc/0x4f0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcc/0xac0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x162/0x4c0 [btrfs] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_buffered_write.isra.0+0x19b/0x740 [btrfs] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x3cf/0x610 [btrfs] new_sync_write+0x11e/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x1c9/0x200 ksys_write+0x68/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &ctl->tree_lock --> &space_info->lock --> &cache->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&cache->lock); lock(&space_info->lock); lock(&cache->lock); lock(&ctl->tree_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by dd/563090: #0: ffff9e7e21d18448 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x195/0x200 #1: ffff9e7dd0410ed8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#19){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_file_write_iter+0x86/0x610 [btrfs] #2: ffff9e7e21d18638 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5b0 [btrfs] #3: ffff9e7e1f05d688 (&cur_trans->cache_write_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x158/0x4f0 [btrfs] #4: ffff9e7e2284ddb8 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dump_space_info+0x69/0x120 [btrfs] #5: ffff9e7e2284d428 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_dump_space_info+0xaa/0x120 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 563090 Comm: dd Tainted: G OE 5.8.0-rc5+ #20 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./890FX Deluxe5, BIOS P1.40 05/03/2011 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x96/0xd0 check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460 ? wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x30/0x40 lock_acquire+0xab/0x360 ? btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 ? btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_dump_space_info+0xf4/0x120 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x176/0x180 [btrfs] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x145/0x550 [btrfs] ? btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data+0x1d/0x60 [btrfs] cache_save_setup+0x28d/0x3b0 [btrfs] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1fc/0x4f0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcc/0xac0 [btrfs] ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5b0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x162/0x4c0 [btrfs] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_buffered_write.isra.0+0x19b/0x740 [btrfs] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xa8/0xd0 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 btrfs_file_write_iter+0x3cf/0x610 [btrfs] new_sync_write+0x11e/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x1c9/0x200 ksys_write+0x68/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This is because we're holding the block_group->lock while trying to dump the free space cache. However we don't need this lock, we just need it to read the values for the printk, so move the free space cache dumping outside of the block group lock. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: fix reclaim_size counter leak after stealing from global reserveFilipe Manana2020-07-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 7f9fe614407692 ("btrfs: improve global reserve stealing logic"), added in the 5.8 merge window, introduced another leak for the space_info's reclaim_size counter. This is very often triggered by the test cases generic/269 and generic/416 from fstests, producing a stack trace like the following during unmount: [37079.155499] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [37079.156844] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2000423 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3422 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2eb/0x300 [btrfs] [37079.158090] Modules linked in: dm_snapshot btrfs dm_thin_pool (...) [37079.164440] CPU: 2 PID: 2000423 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc7-btrfs-next-62 #1 [37079.165422] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), (...) [37079.167384] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2eb/0x300 [btrfs] [37079.168375] Code: bd 58 ff ff ff 00 4c 8d (...) [37079.170199] RSP: 0018:ffffaa53875c7de0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [37079.171120] RAX: ffff98099e701cf8 RBX: ffff98099e2d4000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [37079.172057] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffc0acc5b1 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [37079.173002] RBP: ffff98099e701cf8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [37079.173886] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff98099e701c00 [37079.174730] R13: ffff98099e2d5100 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100 [37079.175578] FS: 00007f4d7d0a5840(0000) GS:ffff9809ec600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [37079.176434] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [37079.177289] CR2: 0000559224dcc000 CR3: 000000012207a004 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [37079.178152] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [37079.178935] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [37079.179675] Call Trace: [37079.180419] close_ctree+0x291/0x2d1 [btrfs] [37079.181162] generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 [37079.181898] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [37079.182641] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [37079.183371] deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0x70 [37079.184012] cleanup_mnt+0x100/0x160 [37079.184650] task_work_run+0x68/0xb0 [37079.185284] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf9/0x100 [37079.185920] do_syscall_64+0x20d/0x260 [37079.186556] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [37079.187197] RIP: 0033:0x7f4d7d2d9357 [37079.187836] Code: eb 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 (...) [37079.189180] RSP: 002b:00007ffee4e0d368 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 [37079.189845] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f4d7d3fb224 RCX: 00007f4d7d2d9357 [37079.190515] RDX: ffffffffffffff78 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000559224dc5c90 [37079.191173] RBP: 0000559224dc1970 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffee4e0c0e0 [37079.191815] R10: 0000559224dc7b00 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [37079.192451] R13: 0000559224dc5c90 R14: 0000559224dc1a80 R15: 0000559224dc1ba0 [37079.193096] irq event stamp: 0 [37079.193729] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [37079.194379] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff97ab8935>] copy_process+0x755/0x1ea0 [37079.195033] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff97ab8935>] copy_process+0x755/0x1ea0 [37079.195700] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 [37079.196318] ---[ end trace b32710d864dea887 ]--- In the past commit d611add48b717a ("btrfs: fix reclaim counter leak of space_info objects") fixed similar cases. That commit however has a date more recent (April 7 2020) then the commit mentioned before (March 13 2020), however it was merged in kernel 5.7 while the older commit, which introduces a new leak, was merged only in the 5.8 merge window. So the leak sneaked in unnoticed. Fix this by making steal_from_global_rsv() remove the ticket using the helper remove_ticket(), which decrements the reclaim_size counter of the space_info object. Fixes: 7f9fe614407692 ("btrfs: improve global reserve stealing logic") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: remove pointless assertion on reclaim_size counterFilipe Manana2020-05-251-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | The reclaim_size counter of a space_info object is unsigned. So its value can never be negative, it's pointless to have an assertion that checks its value is >= 0, therefore remove it. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: run btrfs_try_granting_tickets if a priority ticket failsJosef Bacik2020-05-251-4/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With normal tickets we could have a large reservation at the front of the list that is unable to be satisfied, but a smaller ticket later on that can be satisfied. The way we handle this is to run btrfs_try_granting_tickets() in maybe_fail_all_tickets(). However no such protection exists for priority tickets. Fix this by handling it in handle_reserve_ticket(). If we've returned after attempting to flush space in a priority related way, we'll still be on the priority list and need to be removed. We rely on the flushing to free up space and wake the ticket, but if there is not enough space to reclaim _but_ there's enough space in the space_info to handle subsequent reservations then we would have gotten an ENOSPC erroneously. Address this by catching where we are still on the list, meaning we were a priority ticket, and removing ourselves and then running btrfs_try_granting_tickets(). This will handle this particular corner case. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: only check priority tickets for priority flushingJosef Bacik2020-05-251-2/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In debugging a generic/320 failure on ppc64, Nikolay noticed that sometimes we'd ENOSPC out with plenty of space to reclaim if we had committed the transaction. He further discovered that this was because there was a priority ticket that was small enough to fit in the free space currently in the space_info. Consider the following scenario. There is no more space to reclaim in the fs without committing the transaction. Assume there's 1MiB of space free in the space info, but there are pending normal tickets with 2MiB reservations. Now a priority ticket comes in with a .5MiB reservation. Because we have normal tickets pending we add ourselves to the priority list, despite the fact that we could satisfy this reservation. The flushing machinery now gets to the point where it wants to commit the transaction, but because there's a .5MiB ticket on the priority list and we have 1MiB of free space we assume the ticket will be granted soon, so we bail without committing the transaction. Meanwhile the priority flushing does not commit the transaction, and eventually fails with an ENOSPC. Then all other tickets are failed with ENOSPC because we were never able to actually commit the transaction. The fix for this is we should have simply granted the priority flusher his reservation, because there was space to make the reservation. Priority flushers by definition take priority, so they are allowed to make their reservations before any previous normal tickets. By not adding this priority ticket to the list the normal flushing mechanisms will then commit the transaction and everything will continue normally. We still need to serialize ourselves with other priority tickets, so if there are any tickets on the priority list then we need to add ourselves to that list in order to maintain the serialization between priority tickets. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: account for trans_block_rsv in may_commit_transactionJosef Bacik2020-05-251-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | On ppc64le with 64k page size (respectively 64k block size) generic/320 was failing and debug output showed we were getting a premature ENOSPC with a bunch of space in btrfs_fs_info::trans_block_rsv. This meant there were still open transaction handles holding space, yet the flusher didn't commit the transaction because it deemed the freed space won't be enough to satisfy the current reserve ticket. Fix this by accounting for space in trans_block_rsv when deciding whether the current transaction should be committed or not. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: allow to use up to 90% of the global block rsv for unlinkJosef Bacik2020-05-251-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We previously had a limit of stealing 50% of the global reserve for unlink. This was from a time when the global reserve was used for the delayed refs as well. However now those reservations are kept separate, so the global reserve can be depleted much more to allow us to make progress for space restoring operations like unlink. Change the minimum amount of space required to be left in the global reserve to 10%. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: improve global reserve stealing logicJosef Bacik2020-05-251-1/+36
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For unlink transactions and block group removal btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv will first try to start an ordinary transaction and if it fails it will fall back to reserving the required amount by stealing from the global reserve. This is problematic because of all the same reasons we had with previous iterations of the ENOSPC handling, thundering herd. We get a bunch of failures all at once, everybody tries to allocate from the global reserve, some win and some lose, we get an ENSOPC. Fix this behavior by introducing BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL. It's used to mark unlink reservation. To fix this we need to integrate this logic into the normal ENOSPC infrastructure. We still go through all of the normal flushing work, and at the moment we begin to fail all the tickets we try to satisfy any tickets that are allowed to steal by stealing from the global reserve. If this works we start the flushing system over again just like we would with a normal ticket satisfaction. This serializes our global reserve stealing, so we don't have the thundering herd problem. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: fix reclaim counter leak of space_info objectsFilipe Manana2020-04-081-6/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Whenever we add a ticket to a space_info object we increment the object's reclaim_size counter witht the ticket's bytes, and we decrement it with the corresponding amount only when we are able to grant the requested space to the ticket. When we are not able to grant the space to a ticket, or when the ticket is removed due to a signal (e.g. an application has received sigterm from the terminal) we never decrement the counter with the corresponding bytes from the ticket. This leak can result in the space reclaim code to later do much more work than necessary. So fix it by decrementing the counter when those two cases happen as well. Fixes: db161806dc5615 ("btrfs: account ticket size at add/delete time") Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: account ticket size at add/delete timeNikolay Borisov2020-03-231-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | Instead of iterating all pending tickets on the normal/priority list to sum their total size the cost can be amortized across ticket addition/ removal. This turns O(n) + O(m) (where n is the size of the normal list and m of the priority list) into O(1). This will mostly have effect in workloads that experience heavy flushing. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: fix btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size calculationJosef Bacik2020-03-231-9/+34
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I noticed while running my snapshot torture test that we were getting a lot of metadata chunks allocated with very little actually used. Digging into this we would commit the transaction, still not have enough space, and then force a chunk allocation. I noticed that we were barely flushing any delalloc at all, despite the fact that we had around 13gib of outstanding delalloc reservations. It turns out this is because of our btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size() calculation. It _only_ takes into account the outstanding ticket sizes, which isn't the whole story. In this particular workload we're slowly filling up the disk, which means our overcommit space will suddenly become a lot less, and our outstanding reservations will be well more than what we can handle. However we are only flushing based on our ticket size, which is much less than we need to actually reclaim. So fix btrfs_calc_reclaim_metadata_size() to take into account the overage in the case that we've gotten less available space suddenly. This makes it so we attempt to reclaim a lot more delalloc space, which allows us to make our reservations and we no longer are allocating a bunch of needless metadata chunks. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: describe the space reservation system in generalJosef Bacik2020-03-231-0/+147
| | | | | | | | | Add another comment to cover how the space reservation system works generally. This covers the actual reservation flow, as well as how flushing is handled. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: take overcommit into account in inc_block_group_roJosef Bacik2020-01-311-8/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | inc_block_group_ro does a calculation to see if we have enough room left over if we mark this block group as read only in order to see if it's ok to mark the block group as read only. The problem is this calculation _only_ works for data, where our used is always less than our total. For metadata we will overcommit, so this will almost always fail for metadata. Fix this by exporting btrfs_can_overcommit, and then see if we have enough space to remove the remaining free space in the block group we are trying to mark read only. If we do then we can mark this block group as read only. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: don't pass system_chunk into can_overcommitJosef Bacik2020-01-201-27/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | We have the space_info, we can just check its flags to see if it's the system chunk space info. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: rename btrfs_block_group_cacheDavid Sterba2019-11-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | The type name is misleading, a single entry is named 'cache' while this normally means a collection of objects. Rename that everywhere. Also the identifier was quite long, making function prototypes harder to format. Suggested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* Btrfs: remove wait queue from space_info structureFilipe Manana2019-11-181-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | It is not used anymore since commit 957780eb2788d8 ("Btrfs: introduce ticketed enospc infrastructure"), so just remove it. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: add dedicated members for start and length of a block groupDavid Sterba2019-11-181-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The on-disk format of block group item makes use of the key that stores the offset and length. This is further used in the code, although this makes thing harder to understand. The key is also packed so the offset/length is not properly aligned as u64. Add start (key.objectid) and length (key.offset) members to block group and remove the embedded key. When the item is searched or written, a local variable for key is used. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: move block_group_item::used to block groupDavid Sterba2019-11-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For unknown reasons, the member 'used' in the block group struct is stored in the b-tree item and accessed everywhere using the special accessor helper. Let's unify it and make it a regular member and only update the item before writing it to the tree. The item is still being used for flags and chunk_objectid, there's some duplication until the item is removed in following patches. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: add __pure attribute to functionsDavid Sterba2019-11-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | The attribute is more relaxed than const and the functions could dereference pointers, as long as the observable state is not changed. We do have such functions, based on -Wsuggest-attribute=pure . The visible effects of this patch are negligible, there are differences in the assembly but hard to summarize. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* Btrfs: fix race leading to metadata space leak after task received signalFilipe Manana2019-10-251-0/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a task that is allocating metadata needs to wait for the async reclaim job to process its ticket and gets a signal (because it was killed for example) before doing the wait, the task ends up erroring out but with space reserved for its ticket, which never gets released, resulting in a metadata space leak (more specifically a leak in the bytes_may_use counter of the metadata space_info object). Here's the sequence of steps leading to the space leak: 1) A task tries to create a file for example, so it ends up trying to start a transaction at btrfs_create(); 2) The filesystem is currently in a state where there is not enough metadata free space to satisfy the transaction's needs. So at space-info.c:__reserve_metadata_bytes() we create a ticket and add it to the list of tickets of the space info object. Also, because the metadata async reclaim job is not running, we queue a job ro run metadata reclaim; 3) In the meanwhile the task receives a signal (like SIGTERM from a kill command for example); 4) After queing the async reclaim job, at __reserve_metadata_bytes(), we unlock the metadata space info and call handle_reserve_ticket(); 5) That last function calls wait_reserve_ticket(), which acquires the lock from the metadata space info. Then in the first iteration of its while loop, it calls prepare_to_wait_event(), which returns -ERESTARTSYS because the task has a pending signal. As a result, we set the error field of the ticket to -EINTR and exit the while loop without deleting the ticket from the list of tickets (in the space info object). After exiting the loop we unlock the space info; 6) The async reclaim job is able to release enough metadata, acquires the metadata space info's lock and then reserves space for the ticket, since the ticket is still in the list of (non-priority) tickets. The space reservation happens at btrfs_try_granting_tickets(), called from maybe_fail_all_tickets(). This increments the bytes_may_use counter from the metadata space info object, sets the ticket's bytes field to zero (meaning success, that space was reserved) and removes it from the list of tickets; 7) wait_reserve_ticket() returns, with the error field of the ticket set to -EINTR. Then handle_reserve_ticket() just propagates that error to the caller. Because an error was returned, the caller does not release the reserved space, since the expectation is that any error means no space was reserved. Fix this by removing the ticket from the list, while holding the space info lock, at wait_reserve_ticket() when prepare_to_wait_event() returns an error. Also add some comments and an assertion to guarantee we never end up with a ticket that has an error set and a bytes counter field set to zero, to more easily detect regressions in the future. This issue could be triggered sporadically by some test cases from fstests such as generic/269 for example, which tries to fill a filesystem and then kills fsstress processes running in the background. When this issue happens, we get a warning in syslog/dmesg when unmounting the filesystem, like the following: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 13240 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3186 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x314/0x470 [btrfs] (...) CPU: 0 PID: 13240 Comm: umount Tainted: G W L 5.3.0-rc8-btrfs-next-48+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x314/0x470 [btrfs] (...) RSP: 0018:ffff9910c14cfdb8 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000024 RBX: ffff89cd8a4d55f0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff89cdf6a178a8 RDI: ffff89cdf6a178a8 RBP: ffff9910c14cfde8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffff89cd4d618040 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff89cd8a4d5508 R13: ffff89cde7c4a600 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100 FS: 00007f42754432c0(0000) GS:ffff89cdf6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fd25a47f730 CR3: 000000021f8d6006 CR4: 00000000003606f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: close_ctree+0x1ad/0x390 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x110 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0xa0 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x3a/0x70 cleanup_mnt+0xb4/0x160 task_work_run+0x7e/0xc0 exit_to_usermode_loop+0xfa/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x1cb/0x220 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x7f4274d2cb37 (...) RSP: 002b:00007ffcff701d38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000557ebde2f060 RCX: 00007f4274d2cb37 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000557ebde2f240 RBP: 0000557ebde2f240 R08: 0000557ebde2f270 R09: 0000000000000015 R10: 00000000000006b4 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f427522ee64 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffcff701fc0 irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb12b561e>] copy_process+0x75e/0x1fd0 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb12b561e>] copy_process+0x75e/0x1fd0 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 ---[ end trace bcf4b235461b26f6 ]--- BTRFS info (device sdb): space_info 4 has 19116032 free, is full BTRFS info (device sdb): space_info total=33554432, used=14176256, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=196608, readonly=65536 BTRFS info (device sdb): global_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 BTRFS info (device sdb): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 BTRFS info (device sdb): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 BTRFS info (device sdb): delayed_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 BTRFS info (device sdb): delayed_refs_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 Fixes: 374bf9c5cd7d0b ("btrfs: unify error handling for ticket flushing") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: add enospc debug messages for ticket failureJosef Bacik2019-09-091-7/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | When debugging weird enospc problems it's handy to be able to dump the space info when we wake up all tickets, and see what the ticket values are. This helped me figure out cases where we were enospc'ing when we shouldn't have been. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommitJosef Bacik2019-09-091-18/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We ran into a problem in production where a box with plenty of space was getting wedged doing ENOSPC flushing. These boxes only had 20% of the disk allocated, but their metadata space + global reserve was right at the size of their metadata chunk. In this case can_overcommit should be allowing allocations without problem, but there's logic in can_overcommit that doesn't allow us to overcommit if there's not enough real space to satisfy the global reserve. This is for historical reasons. Before there were only certain places we could allocate chunks. We could go to commit the transaction and not have enough space for our pending delayed refs and such and be unable to allocate a new chunk. This would result in a abort because of ENOSPC. This code was added to solve this problem. However since then we've gained the ability to always be able to allocate a chunk. So we can easily overcommit in these cases without risking a transaction abort because of ENOSPC. Also prior to now the global reserve really would be used because that's the space we relied on for delayed refs. With delayed refs being tracked separately we no longer have to worry about running out of delayed refs space while committing. We are much less likely to exhaust our global reserve space during transaction commit. Fix the can_overcommit code to simply see if our current usage + what we want is less than our current free space plus whatever slack space we have in the disk is. This solves the problem we were seeing in production and keeps us from flushing as aggressively as we approach our actual metadata size usage. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: remove orig_bytes from reserve_ticketJosef Bacik2019-09-091-8/+0
| | | | | | | | | Now that we do not do partial filling of tickets simply remove orig_bytes, it is no longer needed. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: fix may_commit_transaction to deal with no partial fillingJosef Bacik2019-09-091-0/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that we aren't partially filling tickets we may have some slack space left in the space_info. We need to account for this in may_commit_transaction, otherwise we may choose to not commit the transaction despite it actually having enough space to satisfy our ticket. Calculate the free space we have in the space_info, if any, and subtract this from the ticket we have and use that amount to determine if we will need to commit to reclaim enough space. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: rework wake_all_ticketsJosef Bacik2019-09-091-7/+49
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that we no longer partially fill tickets we need to rework wake_all_tickets to call btrfs_try_to_wakeup_tickets() in order to see if any subsequent tickets are able to be satisfied. If our tickets_id changes we know something happened and we can keep flushing. Also if we find a ticket that is smaller than the first ticket in our queue then we want to retry the flushing loop again in case may_commit_transaction() decides we could satisfy the ticket by committing the transaction. Rename this to maybe_fail_all_tickets() while we're at it, to better reflect what the function is actually doing. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
* btrfs: refactor the ticket wakeup codeJosef Bacik2019-09-091-50/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that btrfs_space_info_add_old_bytes simply checks if we can make the reservation and updates bytes_may_use, there's no reason to have both helpers in place. Factor out the ticket wakeup logic into it's own helper, make btrfs_space_info_add_old_bytes() update bytes_may_use and then call the wakeup helper, and replace all calls to btrfs_space_info_add_new_bytes() with the wakeup helper. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-10-22 23:55:20 +0000