summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/kunit
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on non-UMLDaniel Latypov2022-05-171-4/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The existing logic happens to work fine on UML, but is not correct when running on other arches. 1. We didn't initialize `int err`, and kunit_filter_suites() doesn't explicitly set it to 0 on success. So we had false "failures". Note: it doesn't happen on UML, causing this to get overlooked. 2. If we error out, we do not call kunit_handle_shutdown(). This makes kunit.py timeout when using a non-UML arch, since the QEMU process doesn't ever exit. Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM") Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: take `kunit_assert` as `const`Miguel Ojeda2022-05-161-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The `kunit_do_failed_assertion` function passes its `struct kunit_assert` argument to `kunit_fail`. This one, in turn, calls its `format` field passing the assert again as a `const` pointer. Therefore, the whole chain may be made `const`. Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOMDaniel Latypov2022-05-122-6/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When filtering what tests to run (suites and/or cases) via kunit.filter_glob (e.g. kunit.py run <glob>), we allocate copies of suites. These allocations can fail, and we largely don't handle that. Note: realistically, this probably doesn't matter much. We're not allocating much memory and this happens early in boot, so if we can't do that, then there's likely far bigger problems. This patch makes us immediately bail out from the top-level function (kunit_filter_suites) with -ENOMEM if any of the underlying kmalloc() calls return NULL. Implementation note: we used to return NULL pointers from some functions to indicate either that all suites/tests were filtered out or there was an error allocating the new array. We'll log a short error in this case and not run any tests or print a TAP header. From a kunit.py user's perspective, they'll get a message about missing/invalid TAP output and have to dig into the test.log to see it. Since hitting this error seems so unlikely, it's probably fine to not invent a way to plumb this error message more visibly. See also: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220329103919.2376818-1-lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Reported-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: Rework kunit_resource allocation policyDavid Gow2022-05-121-57/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | KUnit's test-managed resources can be created in two ways: - Using the kunit_add_resource() family of functions, which accept a struct kunit_resource pointer, typically allocated statically or on the stack during the test. - Using the kunit_alloc_resource() family of functions, which allocate a struct kunit_resource using kzalloc() behind the scenes. Both of these families of functions accept a 'free' function to be called when the resource is finally disposed of. At present, KUnit will kfree() the resource if this 'free' function is specified, and will not if it is NULL. However, this can lead kunit_alloc_resource() to leak memory (if no 'free' function is passed in), or kunit_add_resource() to incorrectly kfree() memory which was allocated by some other means (on the stack, as part of a larger allocation, etc), if a 'free' function is provided. Instead, always kfree() if the resource was allocated with kunit_alloc_resource(), and never kfree() if it was passed into kunit_add_resource() by the user. (If the user of kunit_add_resource() wishes the resource be kfree()ed, they can call kfree() on the resource from within the 'free' function. This is implemented by adding a 'should_free' member to struct kunit_resource and setting it appropriately. To facilitate this, the various resource add/alloc functions have been refactored somewhat, making them all call a __kunit_add_resource() helper after setting the 'should_free' member appropriately. In the process, all other functions have been made static inline functions. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: fix debugfs code to use enum kunit_status, not boolDaniel Latypov2022-05-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 6d2426b2f258 ("kunit: Support skipped tests") switched to using `enum kunit_status` to track the result of running a test/suite since we now have more than just pass/fail. This callsite wasn't updated, silently converting to enum to a bool and then back. Fixes: 6d2426b2f258 ("kunit: Support skipped tests") Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: add ability to specify suite-level init and exit functionsDaniel Latypov2022-05-022-0/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | KUnit has support for setup/cleanup logic for each test case in a suite. But it lacks the ability to specify setup/cleanup for the entire suite itself. This can be used to do setup that is too expensive or cumbersome to do for each test. Or it can be used to do simpler things like log debug information after the suite completes. It's a fairly common feature, so the lack of it is noticeable. Some examples in other frameworks and languages: * https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#setupclass-and-teardownclass * https://google.github.io/googletest/reference/testing.html#Test::SetUpTestSuite Meta: This is very similar to this patch here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210805043503.20252-3-bvanassche@acm.org/ The changes from that patch: * pass in `struct kunit *` so users can do stuff like `kunit_info(suite, "debug message")` * makes sure the init failure is bubbled up as a failure * updates kunit-example-test.c to use a suite init * Updates kunit/usage.rst to mention the new support * some minor cosmetic things * use `suite_{init,exit}` instead of `{init/exit}_suite` * make suite init error message more consistent w/ test init * etc. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: rename print_subtest_{start,end} for clarity (s/subtest/suite)Daniel Latypov2022-05-021-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These names sound more general than they are. The _end() function increments a `static int kunit_suite_counter`, so it can only safely be called on suites, aka top-level subtests. It would need to have a separate counter for each level of subtest to be generic enough. So rename it to make it clear it's only appropriate for suites. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: Make kunit_remove_resource() idempotentDavid Gow2022-04-052-2/+41
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The kunit_remove_resource() function is used to unlink a resource from the list of resources in the test, making it no longer show up in kunit_find_resource(). However, this could lead to a race condition if two threads called kunit_remove_resource() on the same resource at the same time: the resource would be removed from the list twice (causing a crash at the second list_del()), and the refcount for the resource would be decremented twice (instead of once, for the reference held by the resource list). Fix both problems, the first by using list_del_init(), and the second by checking if the resource has already been removed using list_empty(), and only decrementing its refcount if it has not. Also add a KUnit test for the kunit_remove_resource() function which tests this behaviour. Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: split resource API impl from test.c into new resource.cDaniel Latypov2022-04-043-115/+127
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We've split out the declarations from include/kunit/test.h into resource.h. This patch splits out the definitions as well for consistency. A side effect of this is git blame won't properly track history by default, users need to run $ git blame -L ,1 -C13 lib/kunit/resource.c Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: use NULL macrosRicardo Ribalda2022-04-042-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | Replace the NULL checks with the more specific and idiomatic NULL macros. Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.18-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds2022-03-233-57/+100
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan: - changes to decrease macro layering string, integer, EQ/NE asserts - remove unused macros - several cleanups and fixes - new list tests for list_del_init_careful(), list_is_head() and list_entry_is_head() * tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.18-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest: list: test: Add a test for list_entry_is_head() list: test: Add a test for list_is_head() list: test: Add test for list_del_init_careful() kunit: cleanup assertion macro internal variables kunit: factor out str constants from binary assertion structs kunit: consolidate KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT macros kunit: remove va_format from kunit_assert kunit: tool: drop mostly unused KunitResult.result field kunit: decrease macro layering for EQ/NE asserts kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts kunit: reduce layering in string assertion macros kunit: drop unused intermediate macros for ptr inequality checks kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() use KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(), etc. kunit: drop unused assert_type from kunit_assert and clean up macros kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const kunit: factor out kunit_base_assert_format() call into kunit_fail() kunit: drop unused kunit* field in kunit_assert kunit: move check if assertion passed into the macros kunit: add example test case showing off all the expect macros
| * kunit: factor out str constants from binary assertion structsDaniel Latypov2022-01-311-19/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If the compiler doesn't optimize them away, each kunit assertion (use of KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ, etc.) can use 88 bytes of stack space in the worst and most common case. This has led to compiler warnings and a suggestion from Linus to move data from the structs into static const's where possible [1]. This builds upon [2] which did so for the base struct kunit_assert type. That only reduced sizeof(struct kunit_binary_assert) from 88 to 64. Given these are by far the most commonly used asserts, this patch factors out the textual representations of the operands and comparator into another static const, saving 16 more bytes. In detail, KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2 + 2, 5) yields the following struct (struct kunit_binary_assert) { .assert = <struct kunit_assert>, .operation = "==", .left_text = "2 + 2", .left_value = 4, .right_text = "5", .right_value = 5, } After this change static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text __text = { .operation = "==", .left_text = "2 + 2", .right_text = "5", }; (struct kunit_binary_assert) { .assert = <struct kunit_assert>, .text = &__text, .left_value = 4, .right_value = 5, } This also DRYs the code a bit more since these str fields were repeated for the string and pointer versions of kunit_binary_assert. Note: we could name the kunit_binary_assert_text fields left/right instead of left_text/right_text. But that would require changing the macros a bit since they have args called "left" and "right" which would be substituted in `.left = #left` as `.2 + 2 = \"2 + 2\"`. [1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220113165931.451305-6-dlatypov@google.com/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: remove va_format from kunit_assertDaniel Latypov2022-01-312-16/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The concern is that having a lot of redundant fields in kunit_assert can blow up stack usage if the compiler doesn't optimize them away [1]. The comment on this field implies that it was meant to be initialized when the expect/assert was declared, but this only happens when we run kunit_do_failed_assertion(). We don't need to access it outside of that function, so move it out of the struct and make it a local variable there. This change also takes the chance to reduce the number of macros by inlining the now simplified KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT_STRUCT() macro. [1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static constDaniel Latypov2022-01-252-10/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is per Linus's suggestion in [1]. The issue there is that every KUNIT_EXPECT/KUNIT_ASSERT puts a kunit_assert object onto the stack. Normally we rely on compilers to elide this, but when that doesn't work out, this blows up the stack usage of kunit test functions. We can move some data off the stack by making it static. This change introduces a new `struct kunit_loc` to hold the file and line number and then just passing assert_type (EXPECT or ASSERT) as an argument. In [1], it was suggested to also move out the format string as well, but users could theoretically craft a format string at runtime, so we can't. This change leaves a copy of `assert_type` in kunit_assert for now because cleaning up all the macros to not pass it around is a bit more involved. Here's an example of the expanded code for KUNIT_FAIL(): if (__builtin_expect(!!(!(false)), 0)) { static const struct kunit_loc loc = { .file = ... }; struct kunit_fail_assert __assertion = { .assert = { .type ... }; kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, &loc, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, &__assertion.assert, ...); }; [1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: factor out kunit_base_assert_format() call into kunit_fail()Daniel Latypov2022-01-252-6/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We call this function first thing for all the assertion `format()` functions. This is the part that prints the file and line number and assertion type (EXPECTATION, ASSERTION). Having it as part of the format functions lets us have the flexibility to not print that information (or print it differently) for new assertion types, but I think this we don't need that. And in the future, we'd like to consider factoring that data (file, line#, type) out of the kunit_assert struct and into a `static` variable, as Linus suggested [1], so we'd need to extract it anyways. [1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/VULQg1z6BAAJ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: move check if assertion passed into the macrosDaniel Latypov2022-01-251-9/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently the code always calls kunit_do_assertion() even though it does nothing when `pass` is true. This change moves the `if(!(pass))` check into the macro instead and renames the function to kunit_do_failed_assertion(). I feel this a bit easier to read and understand. This has the potential upside of avoiding a function call that does nothing most of the time (assuming your tests are passing) but comes with the downside of generating a bit more code and branches. We try to mitigate the branches by tagging them with `unlikely()`. This also means we don't have to initialize structs that we don't need, which will become a tiny bit more expensive if we switch over to using static variables to try and reduce stack usage. (There's runtime code to check if the variable has been initialized yet or not). Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: add example test case showing off all the expect macrosDaniel Latypov2022-01-251-0/+42
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, these macros are only really documented near the bottom of https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.html#c.KUNIT_FAIL. E.g. it's likely someone might just not realize that KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() exists and instead use KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(strcmp()) or similar. This can also serve as a basic smoketest that the KUnit assert machinery still works for all the macros. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* | kunit: make kunit_test_timeout compatible with commentPeng Liu2022-03-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In function kunit_test_timeout, it is declared "300 * MSEC_PER_SEC" represent 5min. However, it is wrong when dealing with arm64 whose default HZ = 250, or some other situations. Use msecs_to_jiffies to fix this, and kunit_test_timeout will work as desired. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309083753.1561921-3-liupeng256@huawei.com Fixes: 5f3e06208920 ("kunit: test: add support for test abort") Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Wang Kefeng <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* | kunit: fix UAF when run kfence test case test_gfpzeroPeng Liu2022-03-221-0/+1
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch series "kunit: fix a UAF bug and do some optimization", v2. This series is to fix UAF (use after free) when running kfence test case test_gfpzero, which is time costly. This UAF bug can be easily triggered by setting CONFIG_KFENCE_NUM_OBJECTS = 65535. Furthermore, some optimization for kunit tests has been done. This patch (of 3): Kunit will create a new thread to run an actual test case, and the main process will wait for the completion of the actual test thread until overtime. The variable "struct kunit test" has local property in function kunit_try_catch_run, and will be used in the test case thread. Task kunit_try_catch_run will free "struct kunit test" when kunit runs overtime, but the actual test case is still run and an UAF bug will be triggered. The above problem has been both observed in a physical machine and qemu platform when running kfence kunit tests. The problem can be triggered when setting CONFIG_KFENCE_NUM_OBJECTS = 65535. Under this setting, the test case test_gfpzero will cost hours and kunit will run to overtime. The follows show the panic log. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff82d882e9 Call Trace: kunit_log_append+0x58/0xd0 ... test_alloc.constprop.0.cold+0x6b/0x8a [kfence_test] test_gfpzero.cold+0x61/0x8ab [kfence_test] kunit_try_run_case+0x4c/0x70 kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x11/0x20 kthread+0x166/0x190 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 To solve this problem, the test case thread should be stopped when the kunit frame runs overtime. The stop signal will send in function kunit_try_catch_run, and test_gfpzero will handle it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309083753.1561921-1-liupeng256@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309083753.1561921-2-liupeng256@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Wang Kefeng <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* Merge branch 'signal-for-v5.17' of ↵Linus Torvalds2022-01-171-2/+2
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace Pull signal/exit/ptrace updates from Eric Biederman: "This set of changes deletes some dead code, makes a lot of cleanups which hopefully make the code easier to follow, and fixes bugs found along the way. The end-game which I have not yet reached yet is for fatal signals that generate coredumps to be short-circuit deliverable from complete_signal, for force_siginfo_to_task not to require changing userspace configured signal delivery state, and for the ptrace stops to always happen in locations where we can guarantee on all architectures that the all of the registers are saved and available on the stack. Removal of profile_task_ext, profile_munmap, and profile_handoff_task are the big successes for dead code removal this round. A bunch of small bug fixes are included, as most of the issues reported were small enough that they would not affect bisection so I simply added the fixes and did not fold the fixes into the changes they were fixing. There was a bug that broke coredumps piped to systemd-coredump. I dropped the change that caused that bug and replaced it entirely with something much more restrained. Unfortunately that required some rebasing. Some successes after this set of changes: There are few enough calls to do_exit to audit in a reasonable amount of time. The lifetime of struct kthread now matches the lifetime of struct task, and the pointer to struct kthread is no longer stored in set_child_tid. The flag SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP is removed. The field group_exit_task is removed. Issues where task->exit_code was examined with signal->group_exit_code should been examined were fixed. There are several loosely related changes included because I am cleaning up and if I don't include them they will probably get lost. The original postings of these changes can be found at: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87a6ha4zsd.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87bl1kunjj.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87r19opkx1.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org I trimmed back the last set of changes to only the obviously correct once. Simply because there was less time for review than I had hoped" * 'signal-for-v5.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace: (44 commits) ptrace/m68k: Stop open coding ptrace_report_syscall ptrace: Remove unused regs argument from ptrace_report_syscall ptrace: Remove second setting of PT_SEIZED in ptrace_attach taskstats: Cleanup the use of task->exit_code exit: Use the correct exit_code in /proc/<pid>/stat exit: Fix the exit_code for wait_task_zombie exit: Coredumps reach do_group_exit exit: Remove profile_handoff_task exit: Remove profile_task_exit & profile_munmap signal: clean up kernel-doc comments signal: Remove the helper signal_group_exit signal: Rename group_exit_task group_exec_task coredump: Stop setting signal->group_exit_task signal: Remove SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP signal: During coredumps set SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT in zap_process signal: Make coredump handling explicit in complete_signal signal: Have prepare_signal detect coredumps using signal->core_state signal: Have the oom killer detect coredumps using signal->core_state exit: Move force_uaccess back into do_exit exit: Guarantee make_task_dead leaks the tsk when calling do_task_exit ...
| * exit: Rename complete_and_exit to kthread_complete_and_exitEric W. Biederman2021-12-131-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Update complete_and_exit to call kthread_exit instead of do_exit. Change the name to reflect this change in functionality. All of the users of complete_and_exit are causing the current kthread to exit so this change makes it clear what is happening. Move the implementation of kthread_complete_and_exit from kernel/exit.c to to kernel/kthread.c. As this function is kthread specific it makes most sense to live with the kthread functions. There are no functional change. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
* | kunit: Report test parameter results as (K)TAP subtestsDavid Gow2021-12-131-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, the results for individial parameters in a parameterised test are simply output as (K)TAP diagnostic lines. As kunit_tool now supports nested subtests, report each parameter as its own subtest. For example, here's what the output now looks like: # Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding ok 1 - 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits ok 2 - 1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits ok 3 - 1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits ok 4 - 2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits ok 5 - 2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on ok 6 - 2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on ok 7 - 2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on ok 8 - 2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on ok 9 - 2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on ok 10 - 2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on ok 11 - 2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on ok 12 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on ok 13 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns ok 14 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. Max ns ok 15 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on ok 16 - 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16 ok 1 - inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* | kunit: Don't crash if no parameters are generatedDavid Gow2021-12-131-8/+10
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | It's possible that a parameterised test could end up with zero parameters. At the moment, the test function will nevertheless be called with NULL as the parameter. Instead, don't try to run the test code, and just mark the test as SKIPped. Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: Reset suite count after running testsDavid Gow2021-10-191-2/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are some KUnit tests (KFENCE, Thunderbolt) which, for various reasons, do not use the kunit_test_suite() macro and end up running before the KUnit executor runs its tests. This means that their results are printed separately, and they aren't included in the suite count used by the executor. This causes the executor output to be invalid TAP, however, as the suite numbers used are no-longer 1-based, and don't match the test plan. kunit_tool, therefore, prints a large number of warnings. While it'd be nice to fix the tests to run in the executor, in the meantime, reset the suite counter to 1 in __kunit_test_suites_exit. Not only does this fix the executor, it means that if there are multiple calls to __kunit_test_suites_init() across different tests, they'll each get their own numbering. kunit_tool likes this better: even if it's lacking the results for those tests which don't use the executor (due to the lack of TAP header), the output for the other tests is valid. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out testsDaniel Latypov2021-10-191-5/+40
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "<suite>.<test>" * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: fix too small allocation when using suite-only kunit.filter_globDaniel Latypov2021-10-192-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a user filters by a suite and not a test, e.g. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'suite_name' it hits this code const int len = strlen(filter_glob); ... parsed->suite_glob = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); which fails to allocate space for the terminating NULL. Somehow, it seems like we can't easily reproduce this under UML, so the existing `parse_filter_test()` didn't catch this. Fix this by allocating `len + 1` and switch to kzalloc() just to be a bit more defensive. We're only going to run this code once per kernel boot, and it should never be very long. Also update the unit tests to be a bit more cautious. This bug showed up as a NULL pointer dereference here: > KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered.start[0][0]->name, "suite0"); `filtered.start[0][0]` was NULL, and `name` is at offset 0 in the struct, so `...->name` was also NULL. Fixes: 3b29021ddd10 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via globDaniel Latypov2021-10-192-24/+192
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: drop assumption in kunit-log-test about current suiteDaniel Latypov2021-10-191-6/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This test assumes that the declared kunit_suite object is the exact one which is being executed, which KUnit will not guarantee [1]. Specifically, `suite->log` is not initialized until a suite object is executed. So if KUnit makes a copy of the suite and runs that instead, this test dereferences an invalid pointer and (hopefully) segfaults. N.B. since we no longer assume this, we can no longer verify that `suite->log` is *not* allocated during normal execution. An alternative to this patch that would allow us to test that would require exposing an API for the current test to get its current suite. Exposing that for one internal kunit test seems like overkill, and grants users more footguns (e.g. reusing a test case in multiple suites and changing behavior based on the suite name, dynamically modifying the setup/cleanup funcs, storing/reading stuff out of the suite->log, etc.). [1] In a subsequent patch, KUnit will allow running subsets of test cases within a suite by making a copy of the suite w/ the filtered test list. But there are other reasons KUnit might execute a copy, e.g. if it ever wants to support parallel execution of different suites, recovering from errors and restarting suites Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: fix reference count leak in kfree_at_endXiyu Yang2021-10-011-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The reference counting issue happens in the normal path of kfree_at_end(). When kunit_alloc_and_get_resource() is invoked, the function forgets to handle the returned resource object, whose refcount increased inside, causing a refcount leak. Fix this issue by calling kunit_alloc_resource() instead of kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(). Fixed the following when applying: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis + kunit_alloc_resource(test, NULL, kfree_res_free, GFP_KERNEL, (void *)to_free); Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* Merge tag 'kbuild-v5.15' of ↵Linus Torvalds2021-09-031-1/+1
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild Pull Kbuild updates from Masahiro Yamada: - Add -s option (strict mode) to merge_config.sh to make it fail when any symbol is redefined. - Show a warning if a different compiler is used for building external modules. - Infer --target from ARCH for CC=clang to let you cross-compile the kernel without CROSS_COMPILE. - Make the integrated assembler default (LLVM_IAS=1) for CC=clang. - Add <linux/stdarg.h> to the kernel source instead of borrowing <stdarg.h> from the compiler. - Add Nick Desaulniers as a Kbuild reviewer. - Drop stale cc-option tests. - Fix the combination of CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS and CONFIG_LTO_CLANG to handle symbols in inline assembly. - Show a warning if 'FORCE' is missing for if_changed rules. - Various cleanups * tag 'kbuild-v5.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild: (39 commits) kbuild: redo fake deps at include/ksym/*.h kbuild: clean up objtool_args slightly modpost: get the *.mod file path more simply checkkconfigsymbols.py: Fix the '--ignore' option kbuild: merge vmlinux_link() between ARCH=um and other architectures kbuild: do not remove 'linux' link in scripts/link-vmlinux.sh kbuild: merge vmlinux_link() between the ordinary link and Clang LTO kbuild: remove stale *.symversions kbuild: remove unused quiet_cmd_update_lto_symversions gen_compile_commands: extract compiler command from a series of commands x86: remove cc-option-yn test for -mtune= arc: replace cc-option-yn uses with cc-option s390: replace cc-option-yn uses with cc-option ia64: move core-y in arch/ia64/Makefile to arch/ia64/Kbuild sparc: move the install rule to arch/sparc/Makefile security: remove unneeded subdir-$(CONFIG_...) kbuild: sh: remove unused install script kbuild: Fix 'no symbols' warning when CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSD_KSYMS=y kbuild: Switch to 'f' variants of integrated assembler flag kbuild: Shuffle blank line to improve comment meaning ...
| * isystem: ship and use stdarg.hAlexey Dobriyan2021-08-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ship minimal stdarg.h (1 type, 4 macros) as <linux/stdarg.h>. stdarg.h is the only userspace header commonly used in the kernel. GPL 2 version of <stdarg.h> can be extracted from http://archive.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-4.2/gcc-4.2_4.2.4.orig.tar.gz Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
* | kunit: Print test statistics on failureDavid Gow2021-08-131-0/+109
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a number of tests fail, it can be useful to get higher-level statistics of how many tests are failing (or how many parameters are failing in parameterised tests), and in what cases or suites. This is already done by some non-KUnit tests, so add support for automatically generating these for KUnit tests. This change adds a 'kunit.stats_enabled' switch which has three values: - 0: No stats are printed (current behaviour) - 1: Stats are printed only for tests/suites with more than one subtest (new default) - 2: Always print test statistics For parameterised tests, the summary line looks as follows: " # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16" For test suites, there are two lines looking like this: "# ext4_inode_test: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1" "# Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16" The first line gives the number of direct subtests, the second "Totals" line is the accumulated sum of all tests and test parameters. This format is based on the one used by kselftest[1]. [1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h#L109 Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-fixes-5.14-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds2021-07-027-49/+295
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest Pull KUnit update from Shuah Khan: "Fixes and features: - add support for skipped tests - introduce kunit_kmalloc_array/kunit_kcalloc() helpers - add gnu_printf specifiers - add kunit_shutdown - add unit test for filtering suites by names - convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit - code organization moving default config to tools/testing/kunit - refactor of internal parser input handling - cleanups and updates to documentation - code cleanup related to casts" * tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-fixes-5.14-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest: (29 commits) kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names kasan: test: make use of kunit_skip() kunit: test: Add example tests which are always skipped kunit: tool: Support skipped tests in kunit_tool kunit: Support skipped tests thunderbolt: test: Reinstate a few casts of bitfields kunit: tool: internal refactor of parser input handling lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit kunit: introduce kunit_kmalloc_array/kunit_kcalloc() helpers kunit: Remove the unused all_tests.config kunit: Move default config from arch/um -> tools/testing/kunit kunit: arch/um/configs: Enable KUNIT_ALL_TESTS by default kunit: Add gnu_printf specifiers lib/cmdline_kunit: Remove a cast which are no-longer required kernel/sysctl-test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required thunderbolt: test: Remove some casts which are no longer required mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: Remove some unnecessary casts from KUnit tests iio: Remove a cast in iio-test-format which is no longer required device property: Remove some casts in property-entry-test Documentation: kunit: Clean up some string casts in examples ...
| * kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by namesDaniel Latypov2021-06-252-14/+152
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This adds unit tests for kunit_filter_subsuite() and kunit_filter_suites(). Note: what the executor means by "subsuite" is the array of suites corresponding to each test file. This patch lightly refactors executor.c to avoid the use of global variables to make it testable. It also includes a clever `kfree_at_end()` helper that makes this test easier to write than it otherwise would have been. Tested by running just the new tests using itself $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run '*exec*' Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: test: Add example tests which are always skippedDavid Gow2021-06-251-0/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add two new tests to the example test suite, both of which are always skipped. This is used as an example for how to write tests which are skipped, and to demonstrate the difference between kunit_skip() and kunit_mark_skipped(). Note that these tests are enabled by default, so a default run of KUnit will have two skipped tests. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: Support skipped testsDavid Gow2021-06-253-21/+77
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The kunit_mark_skipped() macro marks the current test as "skipped", with the provided reason. The kunit_skip() macro will mark the test as skipped, and abort the test. The TAP specification supports this "SKIP directive" as a comment after the "ok" / "not ok" for a test. See the "Directives" section of the TAP spec for details: https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html#directives The 'success' field for KUnit tests is replaced with a kunit_status enum, which can be SUCCESS, FAILURE, or SKIPPED, combined with a 'status_comment' containing information on why a test was skipped. A new 'kunit_status' test suite is added to test this. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: introduce kunit_kmalloc_array/kunit_kcalloc() helpersDaniel Latypov2021-06-251-10/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add in: * kunit_kmalloc_array() and wire up kunit_kmalloc() to be a special case of it. * kunit_kcalloc() for symmetry with kunit_kzalloc() This should using KUnit more natural by making it more similar to the existing *alloc() APIs. And while we shouldn't necessarily be writing unit tests where overflow should be a concern, it can't hurt to be safe. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: Add gnu_printf specifiersDavid Gow2021-06-231-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some KUnit functions use variable arguments to implement a printf-like format string. Use the __printf() attribute to let the compiler warn if invalid format strings are passed in. If the kernel is build with W=1, it complained about the lack of these specifiers, e.g.: ../lib/kunit/test.c:72:2: warning: function ‘kunit_log_append’ might be a candidate for ‘gnu_printf’ format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format] Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: Add 'kunit_shutdown' optionDavid Gow2021-06-111-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a new kernel command-line option, 'kunit_shutdown', which allows the user to specify that the kernel poweroff, halt, or reboot after completing all KUnit tests; this is very handy for running KUnit tests on UML or a VM so that the UML/VM process exits cleanly immediately after running all tests without needing a special initramfs. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Tested-By: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
| * kunit: Fix result propagation for parameterised testsDavid Gow2021-06-111-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When one parameter of a parameterised test failed, its failure would be propagated to the overall test, but not to the suite result (unless it was the last parameter). This is because test_case->success was being reset to the test->success result after each parameter was used, so a failing test's result would be overwritten by a non-failing result. The overall test result was handled in a third variable, test_result, but this was discarded after the status line was printed. Instead, just propagate the result after each parameter run. Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Fixes: fadb08e7c750 ("kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing") Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* | kunit: make test->lock irq safeVlastimil Babka2021-06-291-7/+11
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The upcoming SLUB kunit test will be calling kunit_find_named_resource() from a context with disabled interrupts. That means kunit's test->lock needs to be IRQ safe to avoid potential deadlocks and lockdep splats. This patch therefore changes the test->lock usage to spin_lock_irqsave() and spin_unlock_irqrestore(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210511150734.3492-1-glittao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* kunit: support failure from dynamic analysis toolsUriel Guajardo2021-04-021-4/+35
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a kunit_fail_current_test() function to fail the currently running test, if any, with an error message. This is largely intended for dynamic analysis tools like UBSAN and for fakes. E.g. say I had a fake ops struct for testing and I wanted my `free` function to complain if it was called with an invalid argument, or caught a double-free. Most return void and have no normal means of signalling failure (e.g. super_operations, iommu_ops, etc.). Key points: * Always update current->kunit_test so anyone can use it. * commit 83c4e7a0363b ("KUnit: KASAN Integration") only updated it for CONFIG_KASAN=y * Create a new header <kunit/test-bug.h> so non-test code doesn't have to include all of <kunit/test.h> (e.g. lib/ubsan.c) * Forward the file and line number to make it easier to track down failures * Declare the helper function for nice __printf() warnings about mismatched format strings even when KUnit is not enabled. Example output from kunit_fail_current_test("message"): [15:19:34] [FAILED] example_simple_test [15:19:34] # example_simple_test: initializing [15:19:34] # example_simple_test: lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:24: message [15:19:34] not ok 1 - example_simple_test Fixed minor check patch with checkpatch --fix option: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@google.com> Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: tool: make --kunitconfig accept dirs, add lib/kunit fragmentDaniel Latypov2021-04-021-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TL;DR $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit Per suggestion from Ted [1], we can reduce the amount of typing by assuming a convention that these files are named '.kunitconfig'. In the case of [1], we now have $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=fs/ext4 Also add in such a fragment for kunit itself so we can give that as an example more close to home (and thus less likely to be accidentally broken). [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/YCNF4yP1dB97zzwD@mit.edu/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: make KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() quote values, don't print literalsDaniel Latypov2021-04-021-6/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before: > Expected str == "world", but > str == hello > "world" == world After: > Expected str == "world", but > str == "hello" <we don't need to tell the user that "world" == "world"> Note: like the literal ellision for integers, this doesn't handle the case of KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "hello", "world") since we don't expect it to realistically happen in checked in tests. (If you really wanted a test to fail, KUNIT_FAIL("msg") exists) In that case, you'd get: > Expected "hello" == "world", but <output for next failure> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: Match parenthesis alignment to improve code readabilityLucas Stankus2021-03-231-11/+20
| | | | | | | | | | Tidy up code by fixing the following checkpatch warnings: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis CHECK: Lines should not end with a '(' Signed-off-by: Lucas Stankus <lucas.p.stankus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suitesDaniel Latypov2021-02-082-9/+85
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=<suite_glob>.<test_glob> E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: don't show `1 == 1` in failed assertion messagesDaniel Latypov2021-02-081-6/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, given something (fairly dystopian) like > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2 + 2, 5) KUnit will prints a failure message like this. > Expected 2 + 2 == 5, but > 2 + 2 == 4 > 5 == 5 With this patch, the output just becomes > Expected 2 + 2 == 5, but > 2 + 2 == 4 This patch is slightly hacky, but it's quite common* to compare an expression to a literal integer value, so this can make KUnit less chatty in many cases. (This patch also fixes variants like KUNIT_EXPECT_GT, LE, et al.). It also allocates an additional string briefly, but given this only happens on test failures, it doesn't seem too bad a tradeoff. Also, in most cases it'll realize the lengths are unequal and bail out before the allocation. We could save the result of the formatted string to avoid wasting this extra work, but it felt cleaner to leave it as-is. Edge case: for something silly and unrealistic like > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 4, 5); It'll generate this message with a trailing "but" > Expected 4 == 5, but > <next line of normal output> It didn't feel worth adding a check up-front to see if both sides are literals to handle this better. *A quick grep suggests 100+ comparisons to an integer literal as the right hand side. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* kunit: Support for Parameterized TestingArpitha Raghunandan2020-12-021-13/+46
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit. This approach requires the creation of a test case using the KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macro that accepts a generator function as input. This generator function should return the next parameter given the previous parameter in parameterized tests. It also provides a macro to generate common-case generators based on arrays. Generators may also optionally provide a human-readable description of parameters, which is displayed where available. Note, currently the result of each parameter run is displayed in diagnostic lines, and only the overall test case output summarizes TAP-compliant success or failure of all parameter runs. In future, when supported by kunit-tool, these can be turned into subsubtest outputs. Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
* Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.10-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds2020-10-183-13/+46
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest Pull more Kunit updates from Shuah Khan: - add Kunit to kernel_init() and remove KUnit from init calls entirely. This addresses the concern that Kunit would not work correctly during late init phase. - add a linker section where KUnit can put references to its test suites. This is the first step in transitioning to dispatching all KUnit tests from a centralized executor rather than having each as its own separate late_initcall. - add a centralized executor to dispatch tests rather than relying on late_initcall to schedule each test suite separately. Centralized execution is for built-in tests only; modules will execute tests when loaded. - convert bitfield test to use KUnit framework - Documentation updates for naming guidelines and how kunit_test_suite() works. - add test plan to KUnit TAP format * tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.10-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest: lib: kunit: Fix compilation test when using TEST_BIT_FIELD_COMPILE lib: kunit: add bitfield test conversion to KUnit Documentation: kunit: add a brief blurb about kunit_test_suite kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP format init: main: add KUnit to kernel init kunit: test: create a single centralized executor for all tests vmlinux.lds.h: add linker section for KUnit test suites Documentation: kunit: Add naming guidelines
| * kunit: test: add test plan to KUnit TAP formatBrendan Higgins2020-10-092-11/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TAP 14 allows an optional test plan to be emitted before the start of the start of testing[1]; this is valuable because it makes it possible for a test harness to detect whether the number of tests run matches the number of tests expected to be run, ensuring that no tests silently failed. Link[1]: https://github.com/isaacs/testanything.github.io/blob/tap14/tap-version-14-specification.md#the-plan Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-09 17:19:31 +0000