summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/memfd.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* memfd: drop warning for missing exec-related flagsAleksa Sarai2023-10-041-6/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 434ed3350f57 ("memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags") attempted to make these warnings more useful (so they would work as an incentive to get users to switch to specifying these flags -- as intended by the original MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL patchset). Unfortunately, it turns out that even INFO-level logging is too extreme to enable by default and alternative solutions to the spam issue (such as doing more extreme rate-limiting per-task) are either too ugly or overkill for something as simple as emitting a log as a developer aid. Given that the flags are new and there is no harm to not specifying them (after all, we maintain backwards compatibility) we can just drop the warnings for now until some time in the future when most programs have migrated and distributions start using vm.memfd_noexec=1 (where failing to pass the flag would result in unexpected errors for programs that use executable memfds). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230912-memfd-reduce-spam-v2-1-7d92a4964b6a@cyphar.com Fixes: 434ed3350f57 ("memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags") Fixes: 2562d67b1bdf ("revert "memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags".") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> Reported-by: Damian Tometzki <dtometzki@fedoraproject.org> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* revert "memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags".Andrew Morton2023-09-051-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This warning is telling userspace developers to pass MFD_EXEC and MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL to memfd_create(). Commit 434ed3350f57 ("memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags") made the warning more frequent and visible in the hope that this would accelerate the fixing of errant userspace. But the overall effect is to generate far too much dmesg noise. Fixes: 434ed3350f57 ("memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags") Reported-by: Damian Tometzki <dtometzki@fedoraproject.org> Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZPFzCSIgZ4QuHsSC@fedora.fritz.box Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* memfd: replace ratcheting feature from vm.memfd_noexec with hierarchyAleksa Sarai2023-08-211-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This sysctl has the very unusual behaviour of not allowing any user (even CAP_SYS_ADMIN) to reduce the restriction setting, meaning that if you were to set this sysctl to a more restrictive option in the host pidns you would need to reboot your machine in order to reset it. The justification given in [1] is that this is a security feature and thus it should not be possible to disable. Aside from the fact that we have plenty of security-related sysctls that can be disabled after being enabled (fs.protected_symlinks for instance), the protection provided by the sysctl is to stop users from being able to create a binary and then execute it. A user with CAP_SYS_ADMIN can trivially do this without memfd_create(2): % cat mount-memfd.c #include <fcntl.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <linux/mount.h> #define SHELLCODE "#!/bin/echo this file was executed from this totally private tmpfs:" int main(void) { int fsfd = fsopen("tmpfs", FSOPEN_CLOEXEC); assert(fsfd >= 0); assert(!fsconfig(fsfd, FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE, NULL, NULL, 2)); int dfd = fsmount(fsfd, FSMOUNT_CLOEXEC, 0); assert(dfd >= 0); int execfd = openat(dfd, "exe", O_CREAT | O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC, 0782); assert(execfd >= 0); assert(write(execfd, SHELLCODE, strlen(SHELLCODE)) == strlen(SHELLCODE)); assert(!close(execfd)); char *execpath = NULL; char *argv[] = { "bad-exe", NULL }, *envp[] = { NULL }; execfd = openat(dfd, "exe", O_PATH | O_CLOEXEC); assert(execfd >= 0); assert(asprintf(&execpath, "/proc/self/fd/%d", execfd) > 0); assert(!execve(execpath, argv, envp)); } % ./mount-memfd this file was executed from this totally private tmpfs: /proc/self/fd/5 % Given that it is possible for CAP_SYS_ADMIN users to create executable binaries without memfd_create(2) and without touching the host filesystem (not to mention the many other things a CAP_SYS_ADMIN process would be able to do that would be equivalent or worse), it seems strange to cause a fair amount of headache to admins when there doesn't appear to be an actual security benefit to blocking this. There appear to be concerns about confused-deputy-esque attacks[2] but a confused deputy that can write to arbitrary sysctls is a bigger security issue than executable memfds. /* New API */ The primary requirement from the original author appears to be more based on the need to be able to restrict an entire system in a hierarchical manner[3], such that child namespaces cannot re-enable executable memfds. So, implement that behaviour explicitly -- the vm.memfd_noexec scope is evaluated up the pidns tree to &init_pid_ns and you have the most restrictive value applied to you. The new lower limit you can set vm.memfd_noexec is whatever limit applies to your parent. Note that a pidns will inherit a copy of the parent pidns's effective vm.memfd_noexec setting at unshare() time. This matches the existing behaviour, and it also ensures that a pidns will never have its vm.memfd_noexec setting *lowered* behind its back (but it will be raised if the parent raises theirs). /* Backwards Compatibility */ As the previous version of the sysctl didn't allow you to lower the setting at all, there are no backwards compatibility issues with this aspect of the change. However it should be noted that now that the setting is completely hierarchical. Previously, a cloned pidns would just copy the current pidns setting, meaning that if the parent's vm.memfd_noexec was changed it wouldn't propoagate to existing pid namespaces. Now, the restriction applies recursively. This is a uAPI change, however: * The sysctl is very new, having been merged in 6.3. * Several aspects of the sysctl were broken up until this patchset and the other patchset by Jeff Xu last month. And thus it seems incredibly unlikely that any real users would run into this issue. In the worst case, if this causes userspace isues we could make it so that modifying the setting follows the hierarchical rules but the restriction checking uses the cached copy. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/CABi2SkWnAgHK1i6iqSqPMYuNEhtHBkO8jUuCvmG3RmUB5TKHJw@mail.gmail.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/CALmYWFs_dNCzw_pW1yRAo4bGCPEtykroEQaowNULp7svwMLjOg@mail.gmail.com/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/CALmYWFuahdUF7cT4cm7_TGLqPanuHXJ-hVSfZt7vpTnc18DPrw@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230814-memfd-vm-noexec-uapi-fixes-v2-4-7ff9e3e10ba6@cyphar.com Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flagsAleksa Sarai2023-08-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to incentivise userspace to switch to passing MFD_EXEC and MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL, we need to provide a warning on each attempt to call memfd_create() without the new flags. pr_warn_once() is not useful because on most systems the one warning is burned up during the boot process (on my system, systemd does this within the first second of boot) and thus userspace will in practice never see the warnings to push them to switch to the new flags. The original patchset[1] used pr_warn_ratelimited(), however there were concerns about the degree of spam in the kernel log[2,3]. The resulting inability to detect every case was flagged as an issue at the time[4]. While we could come up with an alternative rate-limiting scheme such as only outputting the message if vm.memfd_noexec has been modified, or only outputting the message once for a given task, these alternatives have downsides that don't make sense given how low-stakes a single kernel warning message is. Switching to pr_info_ratelimited() instead should be fine -- it's possible some monitoring tool will be unhappy with a stream of warning-level messages but there's already plenty of info-level message spam in dmesg. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/20221215001205.51969-4-jeffxu@google.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/202212161233.85C9783FB@keescook/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/Y5yS8wCnuYGLHMj4@x1n/ [4]: https://lore.kernel.org/f185bb42-b29c-977e-312e-3349eea15383@linuxfoundation.org/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230814-memfd-vm-noexec-uapi-fixes-v2-3-7ff9e3e10ba6@cyphar.com Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* memfd: do not -EACCES old memfd_create() users with vm.memfd_noexec=2Aleksa Sarai2023-08-211-19/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Given the difficulty of auditing all of userspace to figure out whether every memfd_create() user has switched to passing MFD_EXEC and MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL flags, it seems far less distruptive to make it possible for older programs that don't make use of executable memfds to run under vm.memfd_noexec=2. Otherwise, a small dependency change can result in spurious errors. For programs that don't use executable memfds, passing MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL is functionally a no-op and thus having the same In addition, every failure under vm.memfd_noexec=2 needs to print to the kernel log so that userspace can figure out where the error came from. The concerns about pr_warn_ratelimited() spam that caused the switch to pr_warn_once()[1,2] do not apply to the vm.memfd_noexec=2 case. This is a user-visible API change, but as it allows programs to do something that would be blocked before, and the sysctl itself was broken and recently released, it seems unlikely this will cause any issues. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/Y5yS8wCnuYGLHMj4@x1n/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/202212161233.85C9783FB@keescook/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230814-memfd-vm-noexec-uapi-fixes-v2-2-7ff9e3e10ba6@cyphar.com Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> Cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* mm/memfd: sysctl: fix MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCEDJeff Xu2023-08-181-24/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch series "mm/memfd: fix sysctl MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED", v2. When sysctl vm.memfd_noexec is 2 (MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED), memfd_create(.., MFD_EXEC) should fail. This complies with how MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED is defined - "memfd_create() without MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL will be rejected" Thanks to Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> who reported the bug. see [1] for context. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CABi2SkXUX_QqTQ10Yx9bBUGpN1wByOi_=gZU6WEy5a8MaQY3Jw@mail.gmail.com/T/ This patch (of 2): When vm.memfd_noexec is 2 (MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED), memfd_create(.., MFD_EXEC) should fail. This complies with how MEMFD_NOEXEC_SCOPE_NOEXEC_ENFORCED is defined - "memfd_create() without MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL will be rejected" Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230705063315.3680666-1-jeffxu@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230705063315.3680666-2-jeffxu@google.com Fixes: 105ff5339f49 ("mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC") Reported-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CABi2SkXUX_QqTQ10Yx9bBUGpN1wByOi_=gZU6WEy5a8MaQY3Jw@mail.gmail.com/T/ Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306301351.kkbSegQW-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jorge Lucangeli Obes <jorgelo@chromium.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* memfd: check for non-NULL file_seals in memfd_create() syscallRoberto Sassu2023-06-191-3/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ensure that file_seals is non-NULL before using it in the memfd_create() syscall. One situation in which memfd_file_seals_ptr() could return a NULL pointer when CONFIG_SHMEM=n, oopsing the kernel. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230607132427.2867435-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com Fixes: 47b9012ecdc7 ("shmem: add sealing support to hugetlb-backed memfd") Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Cc: Marc-Andr Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* memfd: pass argument of memfd_fcntl as intLuca Vizzarro2023-04-181-5/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The interface for fcntl expects the argument passed for the command F_ADD_SEALS to be of type int. The current code wrongly treats it as a long. In order to avoid access to undefined bits, we should explicitly cast the argument to int. This commit changes the signature of all the related and helper functions so that they treat the argument as int instead of long. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414152459.816046-5-Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com Signed-off-by: Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Kevin Brodsky <Kevin.Brodsky@arm.com> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com> Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* mm/memfd: add write seals when apply SEAL_EXEC to executable memfdJeff Xu2023-01-181-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to avoid WX mappings, add F_SEAL_WRITE when apply F_SEAL_EXEC to an executable memfd, so W^X from start. This implys application need to fill the content of the memfd first, after F_SEAL_EXEC is applied, application can no longer modify the content of the memfd. Typically, application seals the memfd right after writing to it. For example: 1. memfd_create(MFD_EXEC). 2. write() code to the memfd. 3. fcntl(F_ADD_SEALS, F_SEAL_EXEC) to convert the memfd to W^X. 4. call exec() on the memfd. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221215001205.51969-5-jeffxu@google.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jorge Lucangeli Obes <jorgelo@chromium.org> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* mm/memfd: add MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXECJeff Xu2023-01-181-2/+46
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The new MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC flags allows application to set executable bit at creation time (memfd_create). When MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL is set, memfd is created without executable bit (mode:0666), and sealed with F_SEAL_EXEC, so it can't be chmod to be executable (mode: 0777) after creation. when MFD_EXEC flag is set, memfd is created with executable bit (mode:0777), this is the same as the old behavior of memfd_create. The new pid namespaced sysctl vm.memfd_noexec has 3 values: 0: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL acts like MFD_EXEC was set. 1: memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL acts like MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL was set. 2: memfd_create() without MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL will be rejected. The sysctl allows finer control of memfd_create for old-software that doesn't set the executable bit, for example, a container with vm.memfd_noexec=1 means the old-software will create non-executable memfd by default. Also, the value of memfd_noexec is passed to child namespace at creation time. For example, if the init namespace has vm.memfd_noexec=2, all its children namespaces will be created with 2. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: add stub functions to fix build] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unneeded register_pid_ns_ctl_table_vm() stub, per Jeff] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/pr_warn_ratelimited/pr_warn_once/, per review] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix CONFIG_SYSCTL=n warning] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221215001205.51969-4-jeffxu@google.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> Co-developed-by: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jorge Lucangeli Obes <jorgelo@chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* mm/memfd: add F_SEAL_EXECDaniel Verkamp2023-01-181-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Patch series "mm/memfd: introduce MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC", v8. Since Linux introduced the memfd feature, memfd have always had their execute bit set, and the memfd_create() syscall doesn't allow setting it differently. However, in a secure by default system, such as ChromeOS, (where all executables should come from the rootfs, which is protected by Verified boot), this executable nature of memfd opens a door for NoExec bypass and enables “confused deputy attack”. E.g, in VRP bug [1]: cros_vm process created a memfd to share the content with an external process, however the memfd is overwritten and used for executing arbitrary code and root escalation. [2] lists more VRP in this kind. On the other hand, executable memfd has its legit use, runc uses memfd’s seal and executable feature to copy the contents of the binary then execute them, for such system, we need a solution to differentiate runc's use of executable memfds and an attacker's [3]. To address those above, this set of patches add following: 1> Let memfd_create() set X bit at creation time. 2> Let memfd to be sealed for modifying X bit. 3> A new pid namespace sysctl: vm.memfd_noexec to control the behavior of X bit.For example, if a container has vm.memfd_noexec=2, then memfd_create() without MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL will be rejected. 4> A new security hook in memfd_create(). This make it possible to a new LSM, which rejects or allows executable memfd based on its security policy. This patch (of 5): The new F_SEAL_EXEC flag will prevent modification of the exec bits: written as traditional octal mask, 0111, or as named flags, S_IXUSR | S_IXGRP | S_IXOTH. Any chmod(2) or similar call that attempts to modify any of these bits after the seal is applied will fail with errno EPERM. This will preserve the execute bits as they are at the time of sealing, so the memfd will become either permanently executable or permanently un-executable. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221215001205.51969-1-jeffxu@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221215001205.51969-2-jeffxu@google.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org> Co-developed-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jorge Lucangeli Obes <jorgelo@chromium.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* memfd: fix F_SEAL_WRITE after shmem huge page allocatedHugh Dickins2022-03-051-12/+28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Wangyong reports: after enabling tmpfs filesystem to support transparent hugepage with the following command: echo always > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled the docker program tries to add F_SEAL_WRITE through the following command, but it fails unexpectedly with errno EBUSY: fcntl(5, F_ADD_SEALS, F_SEAL_WRITE) = -1. That is because memfd_tag_pins() and memfd_wait_for_pins() were never updated for shmem huge pages: checking page_mapcount() against page_count() is hopeless on THP subpages - they need to check total_mapcount() against page_count() on THP heads only. Make memfd_tag_pins() (compared > 1) as strict as memfd_wait_for_pins() (compared != 1): either can be justified, but given the non-atomic total_mapcount() calculation, it is better now to be strict. Bear in mind that total_mapcount() itself scans all of the THP subpages, when choosing to take an XA_CHECK_SCHED latency break. Also fix the unlikely xa_is_value() case in memfd_wait_for_pins(): if a page has been swapped out since memfd_tag_pins(), then its refcount must have fallen, and so it can safely be untagged. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a4f79248-df75-2c8c-3df-ba3317ccb5da@google.com Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Reported-by: wangyong <wang.yong12@zte.com.cn> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* mm,hugetlb: remove mlock ulimit for SHM_HUGETLBzhangyiru2021-11-091-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 21a3c273f88c ("mm, hugetlb: add thread name and pid to SHM_HUGETLB mlock rlimit warning") marked this as deprecated in 2012, but it is not deleted yet. Mike says he still sees that message in log files on occasion, so maybe we should preserve this warning. Also remove hugetlbfs related user_shm_unlock in ipc/shm.c and remove the user_shm_unlock after out. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211103105857.25041-1-zhangyiru3@huawei.com Signed-off-by: zhangyiru <zhangyiru3@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Liu Zixian <liuzixian4@huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: wuxu.wu <wuxu.wu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* Reimplement RLIMIT_MEMLOCK on top of ucountsAlexey Gladkov2021-04-301-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The rlimit counter is tied to uid in the user_namespace. This allows rlimit values to be specified in userns even if they are already globally exceeded by the user. However, the value of the previous user_namespaces cannot be exceeded. Changelog v11: * Fix issue found by lkp robot. v8: * Fix issues found by lkp-tests project. v7: * Keep only ucounts for RLIMIT_MEMLOCK checks instead of struct cred. v6: * Fix bug in hugetlb_file_setup() detected by trinity. Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/970d50c70c71bfd4496e0e8d2a0a32feebebb350.1619094428.git.legion@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
* mm: page cache: store only head pages in i_pagesMatthew Wilcox (Oracle)2019-09-241-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Transparent Huge Pages are currently stored in i_pages as pointers to consecutive subpages. This patch changes that to storing consecutive pointers to the head page in preparation for storing huge pages more efficiently in i_pages. Large parts of this are "inspired" by Kirill's patch https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170126115819.58875-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com/ Kirill and Huang Ying contributed several fixes. [willy@infradead.org: use compound_nr, squish uninit-var warning] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190731210400.7419-1-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Reviewed-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Tested-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Tested-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Tested-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* Revert "mm: page cache: store only head pages in i_pages"Linus Torvalds2019-07-051-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 5fd4ca2d84b249f0858ce28cf637cf25b61a398f. Mikhail Gavrilov reports that it causes the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() in __delete_from_swap_cache() to trigger: page:ffffd6d34dff0000 refcount:1 mapcount:1 mapping:ffff97812323a689 index:0xfecec363 anon flags: 0x17fffe00080034(uptodate|lru|active|swapbacked) raw: 0017fffe00080034 ffffd6d34c67c508 ffffd6d3504b8d48 ffff97812323a689 raw: 00000000fecec363 0000000000000000 0000000100000000 ffff978433ace000 page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(entry != page) page->mem_cgroup:ffff978433ace000 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/swap_state.c:170! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 221 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc31.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/ROG STRIX X470-I GAMING, BIOS 2202 04/11/2019 RIP: 0010:__delete_from_swap_cache+0x20d/0x240 Code: 30 65 48 33 04 25 28 00 00 00 75 4a 48 83 c4 38 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 48 c7 c6 2f dc 0f 8a 48 89 c7 e8 93 1b fd ff <0f> 0b 48 c7 c6 a8 74 0f 8a e8 85 1b fd ff 0f 0b 48 c7 c6 a8 7d 0f RSP: 0018:ffffa982036e7980 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000021 RBX: 0000000000000040 RCX: 0000000000000006 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000086 RDI: ffff97843d657900 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffffa982036e7835 R09: 0000000000000535 R10: ffff97845e21a46c R11: ffffa982036e7835 R12: ffff978426387120 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffd6d34dff0040 R15: ffffd6d34dff0000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff97843d640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00002cba88ef5000 CR3: 000000078a97c000 CR4: 00000000003406e0 Call Trace: delete_from_swap_cache+0x46/0xa0 try_to_free_swap+0xbc/0x110 swap_writepage+0x13/0x70 pageout.isra.0+0x13c/0x350 shrink_page_list+0xc14/0xdf0 shrink_inactive_list+0x1e5/0x3c0 shrink_node_memcg+0x202/0x760 shrink_node+0xe0/0x470 balance_pgdat+0x2d1/0x510 kswapd+0x220/0x420 kthread+0xfb/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40 and it's not immediately obvious why it happens. It's too late in the rc cycle to do anything but revert for now. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CABXGCsN9mYmBD-4GaaeW_NrDu+FDXLzr_6x+XNxfmFV6QkYCDg@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-and-bisected-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* mm: page cache: store only head pages in i_pagesMatthew Wilcox2019-05-141-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Transparent Huge Pages are currently stored in i_pages as pointers to consecutive subpages. This patch changes that to storing consecutive pointers to the head page in preparation for storing huge pages more efficiently in i_pages. Large parts of this are "inspired" by Kirill's patch https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170126115819.58875-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com/ [willy@infradead.org: fix swapcache pages] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190324155441.GF10344@bombadil.infradead.org [kirill@shutemov.name: hugetlb stores pages in page cache differently] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190404134553.vuvhgmghlkiw2hgl@kshutemo-mobl1 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190307153051.18815-1-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Kirill Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Tested-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Tested-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* mm/memfd: add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfdJoel Fernandes (Google)2019-03-051-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Android uses ashmem for sharing memory regions. We are looking forward to migrating all usecases of ashmem to memfd so that we can possibly remove the ashmem driver in the future from staging while also benefiting from using memfd and contributing to it. Note staging drivers are also not ABI and generally can be removed at anytime. One of the main usecases Android has is the ability to create a region and mmap it as writeable, then add protection against making any "future" writes while keeping the existing already mmap'ed writeable-region active. This allows us to implement a usecase where receivers of the shared memory buffer can get a read-only view, while the sender continues to write to the buffer. See CursorWindow documentation in Android for more details: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/database/CursorWindow This usecase cannot be implemented with the existing F_SEAL_WRITE seal. To support the usecase, this patch adds a new F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal which prevents any future mmap and write syscalls from succeeding while keeping the existing mmap active. A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed by Andy. self-tests are provided in later patch to verify the expected semantics. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@google.com/ Thanks a lot to Andy for suggestions to improve code. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190112203816.85534-2-joel@joelfernandes.org Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Marc-Andr Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* memfd: Convert memfd_tag_pins to XArrayMatthew Wilcox2018-10-211-26/+18
| | | | | | | | Switch to a batch-processing model like memfd_wait_for_pins() and use the xa_state previously set up by memfd_wait_for_pins(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
* memfd: Convert memfd_wait_for_pins to XArrayMatthew Wilcox2018-10-211-36/+25
| | | | | | | | | Simplify the locking by taking the spinlock while we walk the tree on the assumption that many acquires and releases of the lock will be worse than holding the lock while we process an entire batch of pages. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
* alloc_file(): switch to passing O_... flags instead of FMODE_... modeAl Viro2018-07-121-1/+1
| | | | | | | ... so that it could set both ->f_flags and ->f_mode, without callers having to set ->f_flags manually. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
* mm: restructure memfd codeMike Kravetz2018-06-071-0/+345
With the addition of memfd hugetlbfs support, we now have the situation where memfd depends on TMPFS -or- HUGETLBFS. Previously, memfd was only supported on tmpfs, so it made sense that the code resided in shmem.c. In the current code, memfd is only functional if TMPFS is defined. If HUGETLFS is defined and TMPFS is not defined, then memfd functionality will not be available for hugetlbfs. This does not cause BUGs, just a lack of potentially desired functionality. Code is restructured in the following way: - include/linux/memfd.h is a new file containing memfd specific definitions previously contained in shmem_fs.h. - mm/memfd.c is a new file containing memfd specific code previously contained in shmem.c. - memfd specific code is removed from shmem_fs.h and shmem.c. - A new config option MEMFD_CREATE is added that is defined if TMPFS or HUGETLBFS is defined. No functional changes are made to the code: restructuring only. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180415182119.4517-4-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Marc-Andr Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>