diff options
author | Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> | 2019-11-19 11:50:52 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> | 2019-12-09 12:24:57 -0800 |
commit | 4bc6b745e5cbefed92c48071e28a5f41246d0470 (patch) | |
tree | cbdb75d612385607fc5c128f06ccdfd4d343ebfe | |
parent | fd6bc19d7676a060a171d1cf3dcbf6fd797eb05f (diff) | |
download | linux-4bc6b745e5cbefed92c48071e28a5f41246d0470.tar.gz linux-4bc6b745e5cbefed92c48071e28a5f41246d0470.tar.bz2 linux-4bc6b745e5cbefed92c48071e28a5f41246d0470.zip |
rcu: Allow only one expedited GP to run concurrently with wakeups
The current expedited RCU grace-period code expects that a task
requesting an expedited grace period cannot awaken until that grace
period has reached the wakeup phase. However, it is possible for a long
preemption to result in the waiting task never sleeping. For example,
consider the following sequence of events:
1. Task A starts an expedited grace period by invoking
synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It proceeds normally up to the
wait_event() near the end of that function, and is then preempted
(or interrupted or whatever).
2. The expedited grace period completes, and a kworker task starts
the awaken phase, having incremented the counter and acquired
the rcu_state structure's .exp_wake_mutex. This kworker task
is then preempted or interrupted or whatever.
3. Task A resumes and enters wait_event(), which notes that the
expedited grace period has completed, and thus doesn't sleep.
4. Task B starts an expedited grace period exactly as did Task A,
complete with the preemption (or whatever delay) just before
the call to wait_event().
5. The expedited grace period completes, and another kworker
task starts the awaken phase, having incremented the counter.
However, it blocks when attempting to acquire the rcu_state
structure's .exp_wake_mutex because step 2's kworker task has
not yet released it.
6. Steps 4 and 5 repeat, resulting in overflow of the rcu_node
structure's ->exp_wq[] array.
In theory, this is harmless. Tasks waiting on the various ->exp_wq[]
array will just be spuriously awakened, but they will just sleep again
on noting that the rcu_state structure's ->expedited_sequence value has
not advanced far enough.
In practice, this wastes CPU time and is an accident waiting to happen.
This commit therefore moves the rcu_exp_gp_seq_end() call that officially
ends the expedited grace period (along with associate tracing) until
after the ->exp_wake_mutex has been acquired. This prevents Task A from
awakening prematurely, thus preventing more than one expedited grace
period from being in flight during a previous expedited grace period's
wakeup phase.
Fixes: 3b5f668e715b ("rcu: Overlap wakeups with next expedited grace period")
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
[ paulmck: Added updated comment. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 11 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h index fa143e40cd93..7a1f09376e62 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h @@ -539,14 +539,13 @@ static void rcu_exp_wait_wake(unsigned long s) struct rcu_node *rnp; synchronize_sched_expedited_wait(); - rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(); - trace_rcu_exp_grace_period(rcu_state.name, s, TPS("end")); - /* - * Switch over to wakeup mode, allowing the next GP, but -only- the - * next GP, to proceed. - */ + // Switch over to wakeup mode, allowing the next GP to proceed. + // End the previous grace period only after acquiring the mutex + // to ensure that only one GP runs concurrently with wakeups. mutex_lock(&rcu_state.exp_wake_mutex); + rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(); + trace_rcu_exp_grace_period(rcu_state.name, s, TPS("end")); rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rnp) { if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(rnp->exp_seq_rq), s)) { |