diff options
author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2020-03-02 05:59:33 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2020-03-02 11:16:27 -0800 |
commit | bb4cf02d4c74f0db60f58c406ddfdfed16d14f84 (patch) | |
tree | 22e88f939c215b01768e9b30f25bc748b4dc2060 | |
parent | 6f2f92a9d04d0f81d3ed59832a852ccc10975f63 (diff) | |
download | linux-bb4cf02d4c74f0db60f58c406ddfdfed16d14f84.tar.gz linux-bb4cf02d4c74f0db60f58c406ddfdfed16d14f84.tar.bz2 linux-bb4cf02d4c74f0db60f58c406ddfdfed16d14f84.zip |
netdevice: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/netdevice.h | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h index 6c3f7032e8d9..b6fedd54cd8e 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static inline void netdev_queue_numa_node_write(struct netdev_queue *q, int node struct rps_map { unsigned int len; struct rcu_head rcu; - u16 cpus[0]; + u16 cpus[]; }; #define RPS_MAP_SIZE(_num) (sizeof(struct rps_map) + ((_num) * sizeof(u16))) @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ struct rps_dev_flow { struct rps_dev_flow_table { unsigned int mask; struct rcu_head rcu; - struct rps_dev_flow flows[0]; + struct rps_dev_flow flows[]; }; #define RPS_DEV_FLOW_TABLE_SIZE(_num) (sizeof(struct rps_dev_flow_table) + \ ((_num) * sizeof(struct rps_dev_flow))) @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ struct rps_dev_flow_table { struct rps_sock_flow_table { u32 mask; - u32 ents[0] ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; + u32 ents[] ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; }; #define RPS_SOCK_FLOW_TABLE_SIZE(_num) (offsetof(struct rps_sock_flow_table, ents[_num])) @@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ struct xps_map { unsigned int len; unsigned int alloc_len; struct rcu_head rcu; - u16 queues[0]; + u16 queues[]; }; #define XPS_MAP_SIZE(_num) (sizeof(struct xps_map) + ((_num) * sizeof(u16))) #define XPS_MIN_MAP_ALLOC ((L1_CACHE_ALIGN(offsetof(struct xps_map, queues[1])) \ @@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ struct xps_map { */ struct xps_dev_maps { struct rcu_head rcu; - struct xps_map __rcu *attr_map[0]; /* Either CPUs map or RXQs map */ + struct xps_map __rcu *attr_map[]; /* Either CPUs map or RXQs map */ }; #define XPS_CPU_DEV_MAPS_SIZE(_tcs) (sizeof(struct xps_dev_maps) + \ |