diff options
author | Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> | 2019-09-06 16:57:22 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> | 2019-10-05 11:58:14 -0700 |
commit | daebf24a8e8c6064cba3a330db9fe9376a137d2c (patch) | |
tree | 6a2e8a7e9cef21bece8ca6a31de088321af828fb /COPYING | |
parent | 54ecb8f7028c5eb3d740bb82b0f1d90f2df63c5c (diff) | |
download | linux-daebf24a8e8c6064cba3a330db9fe9376a137d2c.tar.gz linux-daebf24a8e8c6064cba3a330db9fe9376a137d2c.tar.bz2 linux-daebf24a8e8c6064cba3a330db9fe9376a137d2c.zip |
tools/memory-model: Fix data race detection for unordered store and load
Currently the Linux Kernel Memory Model gives an incorrect response
for the following litmus test:
C plain-WWC
{}
P0(int *x)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 2);
}
P1(int *x, int *y)
{
int r1;
int r2;
int r3;
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
if (r1 == 2) {
smp_rmb();
r2 = *x;
}
smp_rmb();
r3 = READ_ONCE(*x);
WRITE_ONCE(*y, r3 - 1);
}
P2(int *x, int *y)
{
int r4;
r4 = READ_ONCE(*y);
if (r4 > 0)
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
}
exists (x=2 /\ 1:r2=2 /\ 2:r4=1)
The memory model says that the plain read of *x in P1 races with the
WRITE_ONCE(*x) in P2.
The problem is that we have a write W and a read R related by neither
fre or rfe, but rather W ->coe W' ->rfe R, where W' is an intermediate
write (the WRITE_ONCE() in P0). In this situation there is no
particular ordering between W and R, so either a wr-vis link from W to
R or an rw-xbstar link from R to W would prove that the accesses
aren't concurrent.
But the LKMM only looks for a wr-vis link, which is equivalent to
assuming that W must execute before R. This is not necessarily true
on non-multicopy-atomic systems, as the WWC pattern demonstrates.
This patch changes the LKMM to accept either a wr-vis or a reverse
rw-xbstar link as a proof of non-concurrency.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'COPYING')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions