summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm64/kvm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>2024-06-20 16:46:45 +0000
committerOliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>2024-06-20 19:04:10 +0000
commit1785f020b1124c37f59f3d92b7d45ba1d707ee91 (patch)
treeeca1a13241968075b4c7ea6999dc6b2f6a9a2db4 /arch/arm64/kvm
parent2e3cf82063a00ea0629e03e223c7c6ba58718f12 (diff)
downloadlinux-1785f020b1124c37f59f3d92b7d45ba1d707ee91.tar.gz
linux-1785f020b1124c37f59f3d92b7d45ba1d707ee91.tar.bz2
linux-1785f020b1124c37f59f3d92b7d45ba1d707ee91.zip
KVM: arm64: Spin off helper for programming CPTR traps
A subsequent change to KVM will add preliminary support for merging a guest hypervisor's CPTR traps with that of KVM. Prepare by spinning off a new helper for managing CPTR traps. Avoid reading CPACR_EL1 for the baseline trap config, and start off with the most restrictive set of traps that is subsequently relaxed. Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620164653.1130714-9-oliver.upton@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/kvm')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c48
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
index 8fbb6a2e0559..667ed4f558af 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -65,6 +65,29 @@ static u64 __compute_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return hcr | (__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & ~NV_HCR_GUEST_EXCLUDE);
}
+static void __activate_cptr_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ /*
+ * With VHE (HCR.E2H == 1), accesses to CPACR_EL1 are routed to
+ * CPTR_EL2. In general, CPACR_EL1 has the same layout as CPTR_EL2,
+ * except for some missing controls, such as TAM.
+ * In this case, CPTR_EL2.TAM has the same position with or without
+ * VHE (HCR.E2H == 1) which allows us to use here the CPTR_EL2.TAM
+ * shift value for trapping the AMU accesses.
+ */
+ u64 val = CPACR_ELx_TTA | CPTR_EL2_TAM;
+
+ if (guest_owns_fp_regs()) {
+ val |= CPACR_ELx_FPEN;
+ if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
+ val |= CPACR_ELx_ZEN;
+ } else {
+ __activate_traps_fpsimd32(vcpu);
+ }
+
+ write_sysreg(val, cpacr_el1);
+}
+
static void __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
u64 val;
@@ -91,30 +114,7 @@ static void __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
}
- val = read_sysreg(cpacr_el1);
- val |= CPACR_ELx_TTA;
- val &= ~(CPACR_ELx_ZEN | CPACR_ELx_SMEN);
-
- /*
- * With VHE (HCR.E2H == 1), accesses to CPACR_EL1 are routed to
- * CPTR_EL2. In general, CPACR_EL1 has the same layout as CPTR_EL2,
- * except for some missing controls, such as TAM.
- * In this case, CPTR_EL2.TAM has the same position with or without
- * VHE (HCR.E2H == 1) which allows us to use here the CPTR_EL2.TAM
- * shift value for trapping the AMU accesses.
- */
-
- val |= CPTR_EL2_TAM;
-
- if (guest_owns_fp_regs()) {
- if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
- val |= CPACR_ELx_ZEN;
- } else {
- val &= ~CPACR_ELx_FPEN;
- __activate_traps_fpsimd32(vcpu);
- }
-
- write_sysreg(val, cpacr_el1);
+ __activate_cptr_traps(vcpu);
write_sysreg(__this_cpu_read(kvm_hyp_vector), vbar_el1);
}