diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-03-18 09:15:50 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-03-18 09:15:50 -0700 |
| commit | 0a7b0acecea273c8816f4f5b0e189989470404cf (patch) | |
| tree | 0c1057570899dc9eac9ad172b2060491529a4fb6 /block | |
| parent | 4ae3dc83b047d51485cce1a72be277a110d77c91 (diff) | |
| parent | 449ac5514631dd9b9b66dd708dd5beb1428e2812 (diff) | |
| download | linux-0a7b0acecea273c8816f4f5b0e189989470404cf.tar.gz linux-0a7b0acecea273c8816f4f5b0e189989470404cf.tar.bz2 linux-0a7b0acecea273c8816f4f5b0e189989470404cf.zip | |
Merge tag 'vfs-6.9-rc1.fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs
Pull vfs fixes from Christian Brauner:
"This contains a few small fixes for this merge window:
- Undo the hiding of silly-rename files in afs. If they're hidden
they can't be deleted by rm manually anymore causing regressions
- Avoid caching the preferred address for an afs server to avoid
accidently overriding an explicitly specified preferred server
address
- Fix bad stat() and rmdir() interaction in afs
- Take a passive reference on the superblock when opening a block
device so the holder is available to concurrent callers from the
block layer
- Clear private data pointer in fscache_begin_operation() to avoid it
being falsely treated as valid"
* tag 'vfs-6.9-rc1.fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs:
fscache: Fix error handling in fscache_begin_operation()
fs,block: get holder during claim
afs: Fix occasional rmdir-then-VNOVNODE with generic/011
afs: Don't cache preferred address
afs: Revert "afs: Hide silly-rename files from userspace"
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
| -rw-r--r-- | block/bdev.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c index e7adaaf1c219..7a5f611c3d2e 100644 --- a/block/bdev.c +++ b/block/bdev.c @@ -583,6 +583,9 @@ static void bd_finish_claiming(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder, mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_holder_lock); bd_clear_claiming(whole, holder); mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock); + + if (hops && hops->get_holder) + hops->get_holder(holder); } /** @@ -605,6 +608,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bd_abort_claiming); static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder) { struct block_device *whole = bdev_whole(bdev); + const struct blk_holder_ops *hops = bdev->bd_holder_ops; bool unblock = false; /* @@ -627,6 +631,9 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder) whole->bd_holder = NULL; mutex_unlock(&bdev_lock); + if (hops && hops->put_holder) + hops->put_holder(holder); + /* * If this was the last claim, remove holder link and unblock evpoll if * it was a write holder. |