diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-12-15 09:11:28 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-12-15 09:11:28 -0800 |
commit | 51b736b85155a56543fda8aeca5f8592795d7983 (patch) | |
tree | 937c8be978bf66084128cd62fca3e94fa50c3f36 /block | |
parent | a8aa1ebdf880ebe7b5738ccebf67e18d62cbdc0b (diff) | |
parent | 66ae291978177d5c012015f12b8fbc76dc7d0965 (diff) | |
download | linux-51b736b85155a56543fda8aeca5f8592795d7983.tar.gz linux-51b736b85155a56543fda8aeca5f8592795d7983.tar.bz2 linux-51b736b85155a56543fda8aeca5f8592795d7983.zip |
Merge branch 'for-2.6.33' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block
* 'for-2.6.33' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block:
cfq: set workload as expired if it doesn't have any slice left
Fix a CFQ crash in "for-2.6.33" branch of block tree
cfq: Remove wait_request flag when idle time is being deleted
cfq-iosched: commenting non-obvious initialization
cfq-iosched: Take care of corner cases of group losing share due to deletion
cfq-iosched: Get rid of cfqq wait_busy_done flag
cfq: Optimization for close cooperating queue searching
block,xd: Delay allocation of DMA buffers until device is known
drbd: Following the hmac change to SHASH (see linux commit 8bd1209cfff)
cfq-iosched: reduce write depth only if sync was delayed
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r-- | block/cfq-iosched.c | 94 |
1 files changed, 75 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c index cfb0b2f5f63d..e2f80463ed0d 100644 --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ struct cfq_data { */ struct cfq_queue oom_cfqq; - unsigned long last_end_sync_rq; + unsigned long last_delayed_sync; /* List of cfq groups being managed on this device*/ struct hlist_head cfqg_list; @@ -319,7 +319,6 @@ enum cfqq_state_flags { CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_coop, /* cfqq is shared */ CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_deep, /* sync cfqq experienced large depth */ CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_wait_busy, /* Waiting for next request */ - CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_wait_busy_done, /* Got new request. Expire the queue */ }; #define CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(name) \ @@ -348,7 +347,6 @@ CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(sync); CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(coop); CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(deep); CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(wait_busy); -CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(wait_busy_done); #undef CFQ_CFQQ_FNS #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_CFQ_IOSCHED @@ -1574,7 +1572,6 @@ __cfq_slice_expired(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, cfq_clear_cfqq_wait_request(cfqq); cfq_clear_cfqq_wait_busy(cfqq); - cfq_clear_cfqq_wait_busy_done(cfqq); /* * store what was left of this slice, if the queue idled/timed out @@ -1750,6 +1747,12 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_close_cooperator(struct cfq_data *cfqd, return NULL; /* + * Don't search priority tree if it's the only queue in the group. + */ + if (cur_cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq == 1) + return NULL; + + /* * We should notice if some of the queues are cooperating, eg * working closely on the same area of the disk. In that case, * we can group them together and don't waste time idling. @@ -2110,7 +2113,9 @@ static void cfq_choose_cfqg(struct cfq_data *cfqd) cfqd->workload_expires = jiffies + cfqg->saved_workload_slice; cfqd->serving_type = cfqg->saved_workload; cfqd->serving_prio = cfqg->saved_serving_prio; - } + } else + cfqd->workload_expires = jiffies - 1; + choose_service_tree(cfqd, cfqg); } @@ -2128,14 +2133,35 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_select_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd) if (!cfqd->rq_queued) return NULL; + /* - * The active queue has run out of time, expire it and select new. + * We were waiting for group to get backlogged. Expire the queue */ - if ((cfq_slice_used(cfqq) || cfq_cfqq_wait_busy_done(cfqq)) - && !cfq_cfqq_must_dispatch(cfqq)) + if (cfq_cfqq_wait_busy(cfqq) && !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list)) goto expire; /* + * The active queue has run out of time, expire it and select new. + */ + if (cfq_slice_used(cfqq) && !cfq_cfqq_must_dispatch(cfqq)) { + /* + * If slice had not expired at the completion of last request + * we might not have turned on wait_busy flag. Don't expire + * the queue yet. Allow the group to get backlogged. + * + * The very fact that we have used the slice, that means we + * have been idling all along on this queue and it should be + * ok to wait for this request to complete. + */ + if (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq == 1 && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cfqq->sort_list) + && cfqq->dispatched && cfq_should_idle(cfqd, cfqq)) { + cfqq = NULL; + goto keep_queue; + } else + goto expire; + } + + /* * The active queue has requests and isn't expired, allow it to * dispatch. */ @@ -2264,7 +2290,7 @@ static bool cfq_may_dispatch(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq) * based on the last sync IO we serviced */ if (!cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) && cfqd->cfq_latency) { - unsigned long last_sync = jiffies - cfqd->last_end_sync_rq; + unsigned long last_sync = jiffies - cfqd->last_delayed_sync; unsigned int depth; depth = last_sync / cfqd->cfq_slice[1]; @@ -3165,10 +3191,6 @@ cfq_rq_enqueued(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, cfqq->last_request_pos = blk_rq_pos(rq) + blk_rq_sectors(rq); if (cfqq == cfqd->active_queue) { - if (cfq_cfqq_wait_busy(cfqq)) { - cfq_clear_cfqq_wait_busy(cfqq); - cfq_mark_cfqq_wait_busy_done(cfqq); - } /* * Remember that we saw a request from this process, but * don't start queuing just yet. Otherwise we risk seeing lots @@ -3183,6 +3205,7 @@ cfq_rq_enqueued(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, if (blk_rq_bytes(rq) > PAGE_CACHE_SIZE || cfqd->busy_queues > 1) { del_timer(&cfqd->idle_slice_timer); + cfq_clear_cfqq_wait_request(cfqq); __blk_run_queue(cfqd->queue); } else cfq_mark_cfqq_must_dispatch(cfqq); @@ -3251,6 +3274,35 @@ static void cfq_update_hw_tag(struct cfq_data *cfqd) cfqd->hw_tag = 0; } +static bool cfq_should_wait_busy(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq) +{ + struct cfq_io_context *cic = cfqd->active_cic; + + /* If there are other queues in the group, don't wait */ + if (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq > 1) + return false; + + if (cfq_slice_used(cfqq)) + return true; + + /* if slice left is less than think time, wait busy */ + if (cic && sample_valid(cic->ttime_samples) + && (cfqq->slice_end - jiffies < cic->ttime_mean)) + return true; + + /* + * If think times is less than a jiffy than ttime_mean=0 and above + * will not be true. It might happen that slice has not expired yet + * but will expire soon (4-5 ns) during select_queue(). To cover the + * case where think time is less than a jiffy, mark the queue wait + * busy if only 1 jiffy is left in the slice. + */ + if (cfqq->slice_end - jiffies == 1) + return true; + + return false; +} + static void cfq_completed_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) { struct cfq_queue *cfqq = RQ_CFQQ(rq); @@ -3273,7 +3325,8 @@ static void cfq_completed_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) if (sync) { RQ_CIC(rq)->last_end_request = now; - cfqd->last_end_sync_rq = now; + if (!time_after(rq->start_time + cfqd->cfq_fifo_expire[1], now)) + cfqd->last_delayed_sync = now; } /* @@ -3289,11 +3342,10 @@ static void cfq_completed_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) } /* - * If this queue consumed its slice and this is last queue - * in the group, wait for next request before we expire - * the queue + * Should we wait for next request to come in before we expire + * the queue. */ - if (cfq_slice_used(cfqq) && cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq == 1) { + if (cfq_should_wait_busy(cfqd, cfqq)) { cfqq->slice_end = jiffies + cfqd->cfq_slice_idle; cfq_mark_cfqq_wait_busy(cfqq); } @@ -3711,7 +3763,11 @@ static void *cfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q) cfqd->cfq_latency = 1; cfqd->cfq_group_isolation = 0; cfqd->hw_tag = -1; - cfqd->last_end_sync_rq = jiffies; + /* + * we optimistically start assuming sync ops weren't delayed in last + * second, in order to have larger depth for async operations. + */ + cfqd->last_delayed_sync = jiffies - HZ; INIT_RCU_HEAD(&cfqd->rcu); return cfqd; } |