diff options
author | Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> | 2023-06-01 15:58:57 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> | 2023-06-09 15:41:11 +0100 |
commit | 0f417dc1b7330aae06f155ea505899fa74b2eabe (patch) | |
tree | 4223905a1d89c392933daa32b7348f39d3a0f0a8 /certs | |
parent | 72f0ba79a063ec2b21d5874e41c6d82193100515 (diff) | |
download | linux-0f417dc1b7330aae06f155ea505899fa74b2eabe.tar.gz linux-0f417dc1b7330aae06f155ea505899fa74b2eabe.tar.bz2 linux-0f417dc1b7330aae06f155ea505899fa74b2eabe.zip |
media: atomisp: Make atomisp_enum_framesizes_crop() check resolution fits with padding
Now that atomisp_get_padding() takes minimum padding requirements
on BYT/ISP2400 into account, it is possible for a resolution which
fits in the active area of the sensor to not fit in the native area
once padding is added.
For example on the ov2680 which has a native resolution of 1616x1216
the max active resolution of 1600x1200 leaves 16x16 for padding which
meets the worst-case minimum padding requirement of 14x14 on BYT.
But after binning we are left with an native area of 808x608 and
an active area of 800x600. This leaves 8x8 for padding which is not
enough. So on BYT 800x600 is not a valid resolution (it could be
made by lots of cropping without binning but then the remaining
field of view is no good).
Modify atomisp_enum_framesizes_crop() to check the resolution +
padding fits in the native rectangle, removing 800x600 from
the list of valid modes on BYT.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601145858.59652-3-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'certs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions