pwm: Rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()

In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context,
we will need two functions for applying pwm changes:

	int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
	int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);

This commit just deals with renaming pwm_apply_state(), a following
commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function.

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> # for input
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index b0e50ca9398a..c6228843a1a7 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -326,8 +326,8 @@ struct pwm_device *pwm_request_from_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_request_from_chip);
 
-static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
-				  const struct pwm_state *state)
+static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			    const struct pwm_state *state)
 {
 	struct pwm_state *last = &pwm->last;
 	struct pwm_chip *chip = pwm->chip;
@@ -433,11 +433,11 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
 }
 
 /**
- * pwm_apply_state() - atomically apply a new state to a PWM device
+ * pwm_apply_might_sleep() - atomically apply a new state to a PWM device
  * @pwm: PWM device
  * @state: new state to apply
  */
-int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
+int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
 {
 	struct pwm_chip *chip;
 	int err;
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
 	/*
 	 * Some lowlevel driver's implementations of .apply() make use of
 	 * mutexes, also with some drivers only returning when the new
-	 * configuration is active calling pwm_apply_state() from atomic context
+	 * configuration is active calling pwm_apply_might_sleep() from atomic context
 	 * is a bad idea. So make it explicit that calling this function might
 	 * sleep.
 	 */
@@ -475,11 +475,11 @@ int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
 	 * only do this after pwm->state was applied as some
 	 * implementations of .get_state depend on this
 	 */
-	pwm_apply_state_debug(pwm, state);
+	pwm_apply_debug(pwm, state);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_apply_state);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_apply_might_sleep);
 
 /**
  * pwm_capture() - capture and report a PWM signal
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 		state.period = pargs.period;
 		state.polarity = pargs.polarity;
 
-		return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
+		return pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm)
 		state.duty_cycle = state.period - state.duty_cycle;
 	}
 
-	return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
+	return pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_adjust_config);