summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>2021-05-07 17:42:09 -0400
committerLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>2021-05-10 16:26:07 -0400
commit208d8b9d26f5fd0f7c0fcaa460873bbd6b5bebfa (patch)
treeb8e238b66ae4cab6f34cc8feecd22755fd7d2792 /drivers
parent04dfe19a5ed683e91d8285df5be1dbde2f2f39af (diff)
downloadlinux-208d8b9d26f5fd0f7c0fcaa460873bbd6b5bebfa.tar.gz
linux-208d8b9d26f5fd0f7c0fcaa460873bbd6b5bebfa.tar.bz2
linux-208d8b9d26f5fd0f7c0fcaa460873bbd6b5bebfa.zip
drm/dp: Fix bogus DPCD version check in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
Ville pointed this out to me when fixing some issues in drm_dp_read_downstream_info() - the DPCD version check here is bogus as there's no DisplayPort versions prior to 1.0. The original code from i915 that this was extracted from actually did: dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] == DP_DPCD_REV_10 Which is correct, and somehow got missed when extracting this function. So let's fix this. Note that as far as I'm aware, I don't think this fixes any actual issues users are hitting. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210507214209.554866-1-lyude@redhat.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 0f84df8798ab..55b53df6ce34 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
/* No downstream info to read */
- if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
+ if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] == DP_DPCD_REV_10)
return 0;
/* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a