diff options
author | Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> | 2017-05-31 08:22:52 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> | 2017-05-31 08:22:52 -0700 |
commit | 63db7c815bc0997c29e484d2409684fdd9fcd93b (patch) | |
tree | 132764569fad16360e83d774481c35678db5bd0a /fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | |
parent | a54fba8f5a0dc36161cacdf2aa90f007f702ec1a (diff) | |
download | linux-63db7c815bc0997c29e484d2409684fdd9fcd93b.tar.gz linux-63db7c815bc0997c29e484d2409684fdd9fcd93b.tar.bz2 linux-63db7c815bc0997c29e484d2409684fdd9fcd93b.zip |
xfs: use ->b_state to fix buffer I/O accounting release race
We've had user reports of unmount hangs in xfs_wait_buftarg() that
analysis shows is due to btp->bt_io_count == -1. bt_io_count
represents the count of in-flight asynchronous buffers and thus
should always be >= 0. xfs_wait_buftarg() waits for this value to
stabilize to zero in order to ensure that all untracked (with
respect to the lru) buffers have completed I/O processing before
unmount proceeds to tear down in-core data structures.
The value of -1 implies an I/O accounting decrement race. Indeed,
the fact that xfs_buf_ioacct_dec() is called from xfs_buf_rele()
(where the buffer lock is no longer held) means that bp->b_flags can
be updated from an unsafe context. While a user-level reproducer is
currently not available, some intrusive hacks to run racing buffer
lookups/ioacct/releases from multiple threads was used to
successfully manufacture this problem.
Existing callers do not expect to acquire the buffer lock from
xfs_buf_rele(). Therefore, we can not safely update ->b_flags from
this context. It turns out that we already have separate buffer
state bits and associated serialization for dealing with buffer LRU
state in the form of ->b_state and ->b_lock. Therefore, replace the
_XBF_IN_FLIGHT flag with a ->b_state variant, update the I/O
accounting wrappers appropriately and make sure they are used with
the correct locking. This ensures that buffer in-flight state can be
modified at buffer release time without racing with modifications
from a buffer lock holder.
Fixes: 9c7504aa72b6 ("xfs: track and serialize in-flight async buffers against unmount")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.8+
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 38 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c index 62fa39276a24..07b77b73b024 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c @@ -97,12 +97,16 @@ static inline void xfs_buf_ioacct_inc( struct xfs_buf *bp) { - if (bp->b_flags & (XBF_NO_IOACCT|_XBF_IN_FLIGHT)) + if (bp->b_flags & XBF_NO_IOACCT) return; ASSERT(bp->b_flags & XBF_ASYNC); - bp->b_flags |= _XBF_IN_FLIGHT; - percpu_counter_inc(&bp->b_target->bt_io_count); + spin_lock(&bp->b_lock); + if (!(bp->b_state & XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT)) { + bp->b_state |= XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT; + percpu_counter_inc(&bp->b_target->bt_io_count); + } + spin_unlock(&bp->b_lock); } /* @@ -110,14 +114,24 @@ xfs_buf_ioacct_inc( * freed and unaccount from the buftarg. */ static inline void -xfs_buf_ioacct_dec( +__xfs_buf_ioacct_dec( struct xfs_buf *bp) { - if (!(bp->b_flags & _XBF_IN_FLIGHT)) - return; + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&bp->b_lock)); - bp->b_flags &= ~_XBF_IN_FLIGHT; - percpu_counter_dec(&bp->b_target->bt_io_count); + if (bp->b_state & XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT) { + bp->b_state &= ~XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT; + percpu_counter_dec(&bp->b_target->bt_io_count); + } +} + +static inline void +xfs_buf_ioacct_dec( + struct xfs_buf *bp) +{ + spin_lock(&bp->b_lock); + __xfs_buf_ioacct_dec(bp); + spin_unlock(&bp->b_lock); } /* @@ -149,9 +163,9 @@ xfs_buf_stale( * unaccounted (released to LRU) before that occurs. Drop in-flight * status now to preserve accounting consistency. */ - xfs_buf_ioacct_dec(bp); - spin_lock(&bp->b_lock); + __xfs_buf_ioacct_dec(bp); + atomic_set(&bp->b_lru_ref, 0); if (!(bp->b_state & XFS_BSTATE_DISPOSE) && (list_lru_del(&bp->b_target->bt_lru, &bp->b_lru))) @@ -979,12 +993,12 @@ xfs_buf_rele( * ensures the decrement occurs only once per-buf. */ if ((atomic_read(&bp->b_hold) == 1) && !list_empty(&bp->b_lru)) - xfs_buf_ioacct_dec(bp); + __xfs_buf_ioacct_dec(bp); goto out_unlock; } /* the last reference has been dropped ... */ - xfs_buf_ioacct_dec(bp); + __xfs_buf_ioacct_dec(bp); if (!(bp->b_flags & XBF_STALE) && atomic_read(&bp->b_lru_ref)) { /* * If the buffer is added to the LRU take a new reference to the |