diff options
| author | Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> | 2023-01-17 13:36:25 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> | 2023-01-17 13:36:25 +0200 |
| commit | d0e99511834b6828c960e978d9a8cb6e5731250d (patch) | |
| tree | e7b062c1f9d28a55083477a1462286a7923a57fd /include/linux/memcontrol.h | |
| parent | de7d0ff301fccc75281d7d8eb98c4a47faacf32d (diff) | |
| parent | 80f8a66dede0a4b4e9e846765a97809c6fe49ce5 (diff) | |
| download | linux-d0e99511834b6828c960e978d9a8cb6e5731250d.tar.gz linux-d0e99511834b6828c960e978d9a8cb6e5731250d.tar.bz2 linux-d0e99511834b6828c960e978d9a8cb6e5731250d.zip | |
Merge wireless into wireless-next
Due to the two cherry picked commits from wireless to wireless-next we have
several conflicts in mt76. To avoid any bugs with conflicts merge wireless into
wireless-next.
96f134dc1964 wifi: mt76: handle possible mt76_rx_token_consume failures
fe13dad8992b wifi: mt76: dma: do not increment queue head if mt76_dma_add_buf fails
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/memcontrol.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/memcontrol.h | 31 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index e1644a24009c..d3c8203cab6c 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -615,28 +615,32 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root, void mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct mem_cgroup *memcg); -static inline bool mem_cgroup_supports_protection(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static inline bool mem_cgroup_unprotected(struct mem_cgroup *target, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { /* * The root memcg doesn't account charges, and doesn't support - * protection. + * protection. The target memcg's protection is ignored, see + * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection() and mem_cgroup_protection() */ - return !mem_cgroup_disabled() && !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg); - + return mem_cgroup_disabled() || mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg) || + memcg == target; } -static inline bool mem_cgroup_below_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static inline bool mem_cgroup_below_low(struct mem_cgroup *target, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { - if (!mem_cgroup_supports_protection(memcg)) + if (mem_cgroup_unprotected(target, memcg)) return false; return READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.elow) >= page_counter_read(&memcg->memory); } -static inline bool mem_cgroup_below_min(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static inline bool mem_cgroup_below_min(struct mem_cgroup *target, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { - if (!mem_cgroup_supports_protection(memcg)) + if (mem_cgroup_unprotected(target, memcg)) return false; return READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.emin) >= @@ -1209,12 +1213,19 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root, { } -static inline bool mem_cgroup_below_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static inline bool mem_cgroup_unprotected(struct mem_cgroup *target, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + return true; +} +static inline bool mem_cgroup_below_low(struct mem_cgroup *target, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { return false; } -static inline bool mem_cgroup_below_min(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static inline bool mem_cgroup_below_min(struct mem_cgroup *target, + struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { return false; } |