kasan: detect negative size in memory operation function

Patch series "fix the missing underflow in memory operation function", v4.

The patchset helps to produce a KASAN report when size is negative in
memory operation functions.  It is helpful for programmer to solve an
undefined behavior issue.  Patch 1 based on Dmitry's review and
suggestion, patch 2 is a test in order to verify the patch 1.

[1]https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199341
[2]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190927034338.15813-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com/

This patch (of 2):

KASAN missed detecting size is a negative number in memset(), memcpy(),
and memmove(), it will cause out-of-bounds bug.  So needs to be detected
by KASAN.

If size is a negative number, then it has a reason to be defined as
out-of-bounds bug type.  Casting negative numbers to size_t would indeed
turn up as a large size_t and its value will be larger than ULONG_MAX/2,
so that this can qualify as out-of-bounds.

KASAN report is shown below:

 BUG: KASAN: out-of-bounds in kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size+0x70/0xa0
 Read of size 18446744073709551608 at addr ffffff8069660904 by task cat/72

 CPU: 2 PID: 72 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.4.0-rc1-next-20191004ajb-00001-gdb8af2f372b2-dirty #1
 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
 Call trace:
  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x288
  show_stack+0x14/0x20
  dump_stack+0x10c/0x164
  print_address_description.isra.9+0x68/0x378
  __kasan_report+0x164/0x1a0
  kasan_report+0xc/0x18
  check_memory_region+0x174/0x1d0
  memmove+0x34/0x88
  kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size+0x70/0xa0

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199341

[cai@lca.pw: fix -Wdeclaration-after-statement warn]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1583509030-27939-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw
[peterz@infradead.org: fix objtool warning]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200305095436.GV2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Suggested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191112065302.7015-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mm/kasan/generic_report.c b/mm/kasan/generic_report.c
index 2d97efd4954f..e200acb2d292 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/generic_report.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/generic_report.c
@@ -110,6 +110,17 @@ static const char *get_wild_bug_type(struct kasan_access_info *info)
 
 const char *get_bug_type(struct kasan_access_info *info)
 {
+	/*
+	 * If access_size is a negative number, then it has reason to be
+	 * defined as out-of-bounds bug type.
+	 *
+	 * Casting negative numbers to size_t would indeed turn up as
+	 * a large size_t and its value will be larger than ULONG_MAX/2,
+	 * so that this can qualify as out-of-bounds.
+	 */
+	if (info->access_addr + info->access_size < info->access_addr)
+		return "out-of-bounds";
+
 	if (addr_has_shadow(info->access_addr))
 		return get_shadow_bug_type(info);
 	return get_wild_bug_type(info);