diff options
author | Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> | 2019-01-04 14:16:59 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> | 2019-01-09 13:58:23 +0100 |
commit | 0977b2383de69dc48e9fa61c5c77878ed08d87fe (patch) | |
tree | f26c4316dbe15a64a58bdfb4ddcc4e9b2bc69718 /tools/testing/selftests/net | |
parent | d972f3dce8d161e2142da0ab1ef25df00e2f21a9 (diff) | |
download | linux-0977b2383de69dc48e9fa61c5c77878ed08d87fe.tar.gz linux-0977b2383de69dc48e9fa61c5c77878ed08d87fe.tar.bz2 linux-0977b2383de69dc48e9fa61c5c77878ed08d87fe.zip |
selftests: xfrm: add block rules with adjacent/overlapping subnets
The existing script lacks a policy pattern that triggers 'tree node
merges' in the kernel.
Consider adding policy affecting following subnet:
pol1: dst 10.0.0.0/22
pol2: dst 10.0.0.0/23 # adds to existing 10.0.0.0/22 node
-> no problems here. But now, lets consider reverse order:
pol1: dst 10.0.0.0/24
pol2: dst 10.0.0.0/23 # CANNOT add to existing node
When second policy gets added, the kernel must check that the new node
("10.0.0.0/23") doesn't overlap with any existing subnet.
Example:
dst 10.0.0.0/24
dst 10.0.0.1/24
dst 10.0.0.0/23
When the third policy gets added, the kernel must replace the nodes for
the 10.0.0.0/24 and 10.0.0.1/24 policies with a single one and must merge
all the subtrees/lists stored in those nodes into the new node.
The existing test cases only have overlaps with a single node, so no
merging takes place (we can always remove the 'old' node and replace
it with the new subnet prefix).
Add a few 'block policies' in a pattern that triggers this, with a priority
that will make kernel prefer the 'esp' rules.
Make sure the 'tunnel ping' tests still pass after they have been added.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/net')
-rwxr-xr-x | tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh | 109 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh index 8db35b99457c..b5a1b565a7e6 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh @@ -46,6 +46,58 @@ do_esp() { ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src $rnet dst $lnet dir fwd tmpl src $remote dst $me proto esp mode tunnel priority 100 action allow } +# add policies with different netmasks, to make sure kernel carries +# the policies contained within new netmask over when search tree is +# re-built. +# peer netns that are supposed to be encapsulated via esp have addresses +# in the 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.2.0/24 subnets, respectively. +# +# Adding a policy for '10.0.1.0/23' will make it necessary to +# alter the prefix of 10.0.1.0 subnet. +# In case new prefix overlaps with existing node, the node and all +# policies it carries need to be merged with the existing one(s). +# +# Do that here. +do_overlap() +{ + local ns=$1 + + # adds new nodes to tree (neither network exists yet in policy database). + ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src 10.1.0.0/24 dst 10.0.0.0/24 dir fwd priority 200 action block + + # adds a new node in the 10.0.0.0/24 tree (dst node exists). + ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src 10.2.0.0/24 dst 10.0.0.0/24 dir fwd priority 200 action block + + # adds a 10.2.0.0/24 node, but for different dst. + ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src 10.2.0.0/24 dst 10.0.1.0/24 dir fwd priority 200 action block + + # dst now overlaps with the 10.0.1.0/24 ESP policy in fwd. + # kernel must 'promote' existing one (10.0.0.0/24) to 10.0.0.0/23. + # But 10.0.0.0/23 also includes existing 10.0.1.0/24, so that node + # also has to be merged too, including source-sorted subtrees. + # old: + # 10.0.0.0/24 (node 1 in dst tree of the bin) + # 10.1.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node 1) + # 10.2.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node 1) + # 10.0.1.0/24 (node 2 in dst tree of the bin) + # 10.0.2.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node 2) + # 10.2.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node 2) + # + # The next 'policy add' adds dst '10.0.0.0/23', which means + # that dst node 1 and dst node 2 have to be merged including + # the sub-tree. As no duplicates are allowed, policies in + # the two '10.0.2.0/24' are also merged. + # + # after the 'add', internal search tree should look like this: + # 10.0.0.0/23 (node in dst tree of bin) + # 10.0.2.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node) + # 10.1.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node) + # 10.2.0.0/24 (node in src tree of dst node) + # + # 10.0.0.0/24 and 10.0.1.0/24 nodes have been merged as 10.0.0.0/23. + ip -net $ns xfrm policy add src 10.1.0.0/24 dst 10.0.0.0/23 dir fwd priority 200 action block +} + do_esp_policy_get_check() { local ns=$1 local lnet=$2 @@ -160,6 +212,41 @@ check_xfrm() { return $lret } +check_exceptions() +{ + logpostfix="$1" + local lret=0 + + # ping to .254 should be excluded from the tunnel (exception is in place). + check_xfrm 0 254 + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail ($logpostfix)" + lret=1 + else + echo "PASS: ping to .254 bypassed ipsec tunnel ($logpostfix)" + fi + + # ping to .253 should use use ipsec due to direct policy exception. + check_xfrm 1 253 + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "FAIL: expected ping to .253 to use ipsec tunnel ($logpostfix)" + lret=1 + else + echo "PASS: direct policy matches ($logpostfix)" + fi + + # ping to .2 should use ipsec. + check_xfrm 1 2 + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "FAIL: expected ping to .2 to use ipsec tunnel ($logpostfix)" + lret=1 + else + echo "PASS: policy matches ($logpostfix)" + fi + + return $lret +} + #check for needed privileges if [ "$(id -u)" -ne 0 ];then echo "SKIP: Need root privileges" @@ -270,31 +357,17 @@ do_exception ns4 10.0.3.10 10.0.3.1 10.0.1.253 10.0.1.240/28 do_exception ns3 dead:3::1 dead:3::10 dead:2::fd dead:2:f0::/96 do_exception ns4 dead:3::10 dead:3::1 dead:1::fd dead:1:f0::/96 -# ping to .254 should now be excluded from the tunnel -check_xfrm 0 254 +check_exceptions "exceptions" if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then - echo "FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail" ret=1 -else - echo "PASS: ping to .254 bypassed ipsec tunnel" fi -# ping to .253 should use use ipsec due to direct policy exception. -check_xfrm 1 253 -if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then - echo "FAIL: expected ping to .253 to use ipsec tunnel" - ret=1 -else - echo "PASS: direct policy matches" -fi +# insert block policies with adjacent/overlapping netmasks +do_overlap ns3 -# ping to .2 should use ipsec. -check_xfrm 1 2 +check_exceptions "exceptions and block policies" if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then - echo "FAIL: expected ping to .2 to use ipsec tunnel" ret=1 -else - echo "PASS: policy matches" fi for i in 1 2 3 4;do ip netns del ns$i;done |