summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/virt/kvm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>2022-05-19 01:49:13 -0700
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2022-05-20 09:10:33 -0400
commite332b55fe79cca72451fe0b797219bd9fe6b9434 (patch)
treefe96c073026e23a94d2d022b4f80b2bf041b5b14 /virt/kvm
parentc41ef29cc1d4fa4ac5f1bb8e6ab57bf6f02cf878 (diff)
downloadlinux-e332b55fe79cca72451fe0b797219bd9fe6b9434.tar.gz
linux-e332b55fe79cca72451fe0b797219bd9fe6b9434.tar.bz2
linux-e332b55fe79cca72451fe0b797219bd9fe6b9434.zip
KVM: eventfd: Fix false positive RCU usage warning
The splat below can be seen when running kvm-unit-test: ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.18.0-rc7 #5 Tainted: G IOE ----------------------------- /home/kernel/linux/arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:80 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 4 locks held by qemu-system-x86/35124: #0: ffff9725391d80b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x77/0x710 [kvm] #1: ffffbd25cfb2a0b8 (&kvm->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: vcpu_enter_guest+0xdeb/0x1900 [kvm] #2: ffffbd25cfb2b920 (&kvm->irq_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: kvm_hv_notify_acked_sint+0x79/0x1e0 [kvm] #3: ffffbd25cfb2b920 (&kvm->irq_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: irqfd_resampler_ack+0x5/0x110 [kvm] stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 35124 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Tainted: G IOE 5.18.0-rc7 #5 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x9b irqfd_resampler_ack+0xfd/0x110 [kvm] kvm_notify_acked_gsi+0x32/0x90 [kvm] kvm_hv_notify_acked_sint+0xc5/0x1e0 [kvm] kvm_hv_set_msr_common+0xec1/0x1160 [kvm] kvm_set_msr_common+0x7c3/0xf60 [kvm] vmx_set_msr+0x394/0x1240 [kvm_intel] kvm_set_msr_ignored_check+0x86/0x200 [kvm] kvm_emulate_wrmsr+0x4f/0x1f0 [kvm] vmx_handle_exit+0x6fb/0x7e0 [kvm_intel] vcpu_enter_guest+0xe5a/0x1900 [kvm] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x16e/0xac0 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x279/0x710 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae resampler-list is protected by irq_srcu (see kvm_irqfd_assign), so fix the false positive by using list_for_each_entry_srcu(). Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Message-Id: <1652950153-12489-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt/kvm')
-rw-r--r--virt/kvm/eventfd.c3
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 59b1dd4a549e..2a3ed401ce46 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ irqfd_resampler_ack(struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian)
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->irq_srcu);
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(irqfd, &resampler->list, resampler_link)
+ list_for_each_entry_srcu(irqfd, &resampler->list, resampler_link,
+ srcu_read_lock_held(&kvm->irq_srcu))
eventfd_signal(irqfd->resamplefd, 1);
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->irq_srcu, idx);