diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/mm/frontswap.rst | 264 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/mm/index.rst | 1 |
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 265 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/mm/frontswap.rst b/Documentation/mm/frontswap.rst deleted file mode 100644 index c892412988af..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/mm/frontswap.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,264 +0,0 @@ -========= -Frontswap -========= - -Frontswap provides a "transcendent memory" interface for swap pages. -In some environments, dramatic performance savings may be obtained because -swapped pages are saved in RAM (or a RAM-like device) instead of a swap disk. - -.. _Transcendent memory in a nutshell: https://lwn.net/Articles/454795/ - -Frontswap is so named because it can be thought of as the opposite of -a "backing" store for a swap device. The storage is assumed to be -a synchronous concurrency-safe page-oriented "pseudo-RAM device" conforming -to the requirements of transcendent memory (such as Xen's "tmem", or -in-kernel compressed memory, aka "zcache", or future RAM-like devices); -this pseudo-RAM device is not directly accessible or addressable by the -kernel and is of unknown and possibly time-varying size. The driver -links itself to frontswap by calling frontswap_register_ops to set the -frontswap_ops funcs appropriately and the functions it provides must -conform to certain policies as follows: - -An "init" prepares the device to receive frontswap pages associated -with the specified swap device number (aka "type"). A "store" will -copy the page to transcendent memory and associate it with the type and -offset associated with the page. A "load" will copy the page, if found, -from transcendent memory into kernel memory, but will NOT remove the page -from transcendent memory. An "invalidate_page" will remove the page -from transcendent memory and an "invalidate_area" will remove ALL pages -associated with the swap type (e.g., like swapoff) and notify the "device" -to refuse further stores with that swap type. - -Once a page is successfully stored, a matching load on the page will normally -succeed. So when the kernel finds itself in a situation where it needs -to swap out a page, it first attempts to use frontswap. If the store returns -success, the data has been successfully saved to transcendent memory and -a disk write and, if the data is later read back, a disk read are avoided. -If a store returns failure, transcendent memory has rejected the data, and the -page can be written to swap as usual. - -Note that if a page is stored and the page already exists in transcendent memory -(a "duplicate" store), either the store succeeds and the data is overwritten, -or the store fails AND the page is invalidated. This ensures stale data may -never be obtained from frontswap. - -If properly configured, monitoring of frontswap is done via debugfs in -the `/sys/kernel/debug/frontswap` directory. The effectiveness of -frontswap can be measured (across all swap devices) with: - -``failed_stores`` - how many store attempts have failed - -``loads`` - how many loads were attempted (all should succeed) - -``succ_stores`` - how many store attempts have succeeded - -``invalidates`` - how many invalidates were attempted - -A backend implementation may provide additional metrics. - -FAQ -=== - -* Where's the value? - -When a workload starts swapping, performance falls through the floor. -Frontswap significantly increases performance in many such workloads by -providing a clean, dynamic interface to read and write swap pages to -"transcendent memory" that is otherwise not directly addressable to the kernel. -This interface is ideal when data is transformed to a different form -and size (such as with compression) or secretly moved (as might be -useful for write-balancing for some RAM-like devices). Swap pages (and -evicted page-cache pages) are a great use for this kind of slower-than-RAM- -but-much-faster-than-disk "pseudo-RAM device". - -Frontswap with a fairly small impact on the kernel, -provides a huge amount of flexibility for more dynamic, flexible RAM -utilization in various system configurations: - -In the single kernel case, aka "zcache", pages are compressed and -stored in local memory, thus increasing the total anonymous pages -that can be safely kept in RAM. Zcache essentially trades off CPU -cycles used in compression/decompression for better memory utilization. -Benchmarks have shown little or no impact when memory pressure is -low while providing a significant performance improvement (25%+) -on some workloads under high memory pressure. - -"RAMster" builds on zcache by adding "peer-to-peer" transcendent memory -support for clustered systems. Frontswap pages are locally compressed -as in zcache, but then "remotified" to another system's RAM. This -allows RAM to be dynamically load-balanced back-and-forth as needed, -i.e. when system A is overcommitted, it can swap to system B, and -vice versa. RAMster can also be configured as a memory server so -many servers in a cluster can swap, dynamically as needed, to a single -server configured with a large amount of RAM... without pre-configuring -how much of the RAM is available for each of the clients! - -In the virtual case, the whole point of virtualization is to statistically -multiplex physical resources across the varying demands of multiple -virtual machines. This is really hard to do with RAM and efforts to do -it well with no kernel changes have essentially failed (except in some -well-publicized special-case workloads). -Specifically, the Xen Transcendent Memory backend allows otherwise -"fallow" hypervisor-owned RAM to not only be "time-shared" between multiple -virtual machines, but the pages can be compressed and deduplicated to -optimize RAM utilization. And when guest OS's are induced to surrender -underutilized RAM (e.g. with "selfballooning"), sudden unexpected -memory pressure may result in swapping; frontswap allows those pages -to be swapped to and from hypervisor RAM (if overall host system memory -conditions allow), thus mitigating the potentially awful performance impact -of unplanned swapping. - -A KVM implementation is underway and has been RFC'ed to lkml. And, -using frontswap, investigation is also underway on the use of NVM as -a memory extension technology. - -* Sure there may be performance advantages in some situations, but - what's the space/time overhead of frontswap? - -If CONFIG_FRONTSWAP is disabled, every frontswap hook compiles into -nothingness and the only overhead is a few extra bytes per swapon'ed -swap device. If CONFIG_FRONTSWAP is enabled but no frontswap "backend" -registers, there is one extra global variable compared to zero for -every swap page read or written. If CONFIG_FRONTSWAP is enabled -AND a frontswap backend registers AND the backend fails every "store" -request (i.e. provides no memory despite claiming it might), -CPU overhead is still negligible -- and since every frontswap fail -precedes a swap page write-to-disk, the system is highly likely -to be I/O bound and using a small fraction of a percent of a CPU -will be irrelevant anyway. - -As for space, if CONFIG_FRONTSWAP is enabled AND a frontswap backend -registers, one bit is allocated for every swap page for every swap -device that is swapon'd. This is added to the EIGHT bits (which -was sixteen until about 2.6.34) that the kernel already allocates -for every swap page for every swap device that is swapon'd. (Hugh -Dickins has observed that frontswap could probably steal one of -the existing eight bits, but let's worry about that minor optimization -later.) For very large swap disks (which are rare) on a standard -4K pagesize, this is 1MB per 32GB swap. - -When swap pages are stored in transcendent memory instead of written -out to disk, there is a side effect that this may create more memory -pressure that can potentially outweigh the other advantages. A -backend, such as zcache, must implement policies to carefully (but -dynamically) manage memory limits to ensure this doesn't happen. - -* OK, how about a quick overview of what this frontswap patch does - in terms that a kernel hacker can grok? - -Let's assume that a frontswap "backend" has registered during -kernel initialization; this registration indicates that this -frontswap backend has access to some "memory" that is not directly -accessible by the kernel. Exactly how much memory it provides is -entirely dynamic and random. - -Whenever a swap-device is swapon'd frontswap_init() is called, -passing the swap device number (aka "type") as a parameter. -This notifies frontswap to expect attempts to "store" swap pages -associated with that number. - -Whenever the swap subsystem is readying a page to write to a swap -device (c.f swap_writepage()), frontswap_store is called. Frontswap -consults with the frontswap backend and if the backend says it does NOT -have room, frontswap_store returns -1 and the kernel swaps the page -to the swap device as normal. Note that the response from the frontswap -backend is unpredictable to the kernel; it may choose to never accept a -page, it could accept every ninth page, or it might accept every -page. But if the backend does accept a page, the data from the page -has already been copied and associated with the type and offset, -and the backend guarantees the persistence of the data. In this case, -frontswap sets a bit in the "frontswap_map" for the swap device -corresponding to the page offset on the swap device to which it would -otherwise have written the data. - -When the swap subsystem needs to swap-in a page (swap_readpage()), -it first calls frontswap_load() which checks the frontswap_map to -see if the page was earlier accepted by the frontswap backend. If -it was, the page of data is filled from the frontswap backend and -the swap-in is complete. If not, the normal swap-in code is -executed to obtain the page of data from the real swap device. - -So every time the frontswap backend accepts a page, a swap device read -and (potentially) a swap device write are replaced by a "frontswap backend -store" and (possibly) a "frontswap backend loads", which are presumably much -faster. - -* Can't frontswap be configured as a "special" swap device that is - just higher priority than any real swap device (e.g. like zswap, - or maybe swap-over-nbd/NFS)? - -No. First, the existing swap subsystem doesn't allow for any kind of -swap hierarchy. Perhaps it could be rewritten to accommodate a hierarchy, -but this would require fairly drastic changes. Even if it were -rewritten, the existing swap subsystem uses the block I/O layer which -assumes a swap device is fixed size and any page in it is linearly -addressable. Frontswap barely touches the existing swap subsystem, -and works around the constraints of the block I/O subsystem to provide -a great deal of flexibility and dynamicity. - -For example, the acceptance of any swap page by the frontswap backend is -entirely unpredictable. This is critical to the definition of frontswap -backends because it grants completely dynamic discretion to the -backend. In zcache, one cannot know a priori how compressible a page is. -"Poorly" compressible pages can be rejected, and "poorly" can itself be -defined dynamically depending on current memory constraints. - -Further, frontswap is entirely synchronous whereas a real swap -device is, by definition, asynchronous and uses block I/O. The -block I/O layer is not only unnecessary, but may perform "optimizations" -that are inappropriate for a RAM-oriented device including delaying -the write of some pages for a significant amount of time. Synchrony is -required to ensure the dynamicity of the backend and to avoid thorny race -conditions that would unnecessarily and greatly complicate frontswap -and/or the block I/O subsystem. That said, only the initial "store" -and "load" operations need be synchronous. A separate asynchronous thread -is free to manipulate the pages stored by frontswap. For example, -the "remotification" thread in RAMster uses standard asynchronous -kernel sockets to move compressed frontswap pages to a remote machine. -Similarly, a KVM guest-side implementation could do in-guest compression -and use "batched" hypercalls. - -In a virtualized environment, the dynamicity allows the hypervisor -(or host OS) to do "intelligent overcommit". For example, it can -choose to accept pages only until host-swapping might be imminent, -then force guests to do their own swapping. - -There is a downside to the transcendent memory specifications for -frontswap: Since any "store" might fail, there must always be a real -slot on a real swap device to swap the page. Thus frontswap must be -implemented as a "shadow" to every swapon'd device with the potential -capability of holding every page that the swap device might have held -and the possibility that it might hold no pages at all. This means -that frontswap cannot contain more pages than the total of swapon'd -swap devices. For example, if NO swap device is configured on some -installation, frontswap is useless. Swapless portable devices -can still use frontswap but a backend for such devices must configure -some kind of "ghost" swap device and ensure that it is never used. - -* Why this weird definition about "duplicate stores"? If a page - has been previously successfully stored, can't it always be - successfully overwritten? - -Nearly always it can, but no, sometimes it cannot. Consider an example -where data is compressed and the original 4K page has been compressed -to 1K. Now an attempt is made to overwrite the page with data that -is non-compressible and so would take the entire 4K. But the backend -has no more space. In this case, the store must be rejected. Whenever -frontswap rejects a store that would overwrite, it also must invalidate -the old data and ensure that it is no longer accessible. Since the -swap subsystem then writes the new data to the read swap device, -this is the correct course of action to ensure coherency. - -* Why does the frontswap patch create the new include file swapfile.h? - -The frontswap code depends on some swap-subsystem-internal data -structures that have, over the years, moved back and forth between -static and global. This seemed a reasonable compromise: Define -them as global but declare them in a new include file that isn't -included by the large number of source files that include swap.h. - -Dan Magenheimer, last updated April 9, 2012 diff --git a/Documentation/mm/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/index.rst index 5a94a921ea40..31d2ac306438 100644 --- a/Documentation/mm/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/mm/index.rst @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ above structured documentation, or deleted if it has served its purpose. balance damon/index free_page_reporting - frontswap hmm hwpoison hugetlbfs_reserv |