summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/toolchain/gcc/patches-13.x/020-Include-safe-ctype.h-after-C-standard-headers-to-avo.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'toolchain/gcc/patches-13.x/020-Include-safe-ctype.h-after-C-standard-headers-to-avo.patch')
-rw-r--r--toolchain/gcc/patches-13.x/020-Include-safe-ctype.h-after-C-standard-headers-to-avo.patch139
1 files changed, 139 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/toolchain/gcc/patches-13.x/020-Include-safe-ctype.h-after-C-standard-headers-to-avo.patch b/toolchain/gcc/patches-13.x/020-Include-safe-ctype.h-after-C-standard-headers-to-avo.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..986d19057f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/toolchain/gcc/patches-13.x/020-Include-safe-ctype.h-after-C-standard-headers-to-avo.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+From 9970b576b7e4ae337af1268395ff221348c4b34a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org>
+Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 14:36:03 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] Include safe-ctype.h after C++ standard headers, to avoid
+ over-poisoning
+
+When building gcc's C++ sources against recent libc++, the poisoning of
+the ctype macros due to including safe-ctype.h before including C++
+standard headers such as <list>, <map>, etc, causes many compilation
+errors, similar to:
+
+ In file included from /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/gensupport.cc:23:
+ In file included from /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/system.h:233:
+ In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/vector:321:
+ In file included from
+ /usr/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_bool.h:20:
+ In file included from
+ /usr/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_integral.h:32:
+ In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/locale:202:
+ /usr/include/c++/v1/__locale:546:5: error: '__abi_tag__' attribute
+ only applies to structs, variables, functions, and namespaces
+ 546 | _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+ | ^
+ /usr/include/c++/v1/__config:813:37: note: expanded from macro
+ '_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY'
+ 813 | # define _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
+ | ^
+ /usr/include/c++/v1/__config:792:26: note: expanded from macro
+ '_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI'
+ 792 |
+ __attribute__((__abi_tag__(_LIBCPP_TOSTRING(
+ _LIBCPP_VERSIONED_IDENTIFIER))))
+ | ^
+ In file included from /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/gensupport.cc:23:
+ In file included from /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/system.h:233:
+ In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/vector:321:
+ In file included from
+ /usr/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_bool.h:20:
+ In file included from
+ /usr/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_integral.h:32:
+ In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/locale:202:
+ /usr/include/c++/v1/__locale:547:37: error: expected ';' at end of
+ declaration list
+ 547 | char_type toupper(char_type __c) const
+ | ^
+ /usr/include/c++/v1/__locale:553:48: error: too many arguments
+ provided to function-like macro invocation
+ 553 | const char_type* toupper(char_type* __low, const
+ char_type* __high) const
+ | ^
+ /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/../include/safe-ctype.h:146:9: note:
+ macro 'toupper' defined here
+ 146 | #define toupper(c) do_not_use_toupper_with_safe_ctype
+ | ^
+
+This is because libc++ uses different transitive includes than
+libstdc++, and some of those transitive includes pull in various ctype
+declarations (typically via <locale>).
+
+There was already a special case for including <string> before
+safe-ctype.h, so move the rest of the C++ standard header includes to
+the same location, to fix the problem.
+
+gcc/ChangeLog:
+
+ * system.h: Include safe-ctype.h after C++ standard headers.
+
+Signed-off-by: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
+---
+ gcc/system.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
+ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/gcc/system.h b/gcc/system.h
+index b0edab02885..ab29fc19776 100644
+--- a/gcc/system.h
++++ b/gcc/system.h
+@@ -194,27 +194,8 @@ extern int fprintf_unlocked (FILE *, const char *, ...);
+ #undef fread_unlocked
+ #undef fwrite_unlocked
+
+-/* Include <string> before "safe-ctype.h" to avoid GCC poisoning
+- the ctype macros through safe-ctype.h */
+-
+-#ifdef __cplusplus
+-#ifdef INCLUDE_STRING
+-# include <string>
+-#endif
+-#endif
+-
+-/* There are an extraordinary number of issues with <ctype.h>.
+- The last straw is that it varies with the locale. Use libiberty's
+- replacement instead. */
+-#include "safe-ctype.h"
+-
+-#include <sys/types.h>
+-
+-#include <errno.h>
+-
+-#if !defined (errno) && defined (HAVE_DECL_ERRNO) && !HAVE_DECL_ERRNO
+-extern int errno;
+-#endif
++/* Include C++ standard headers before "safe-ctype.h" to avoid GCC
++ poisoning the ctype macros through safe-ctype.h */
+
+ #ifdef __cplusplus
+ #if defined (INCLUDE_ALGORITHM) || !defined (HAVE_SWAP_IN_UTILITY)
+@@ -229,6 +210,9 @@ extern int errno;
+ #ifdef INCLUDE_SET
+ # include <set>
+ #endif
++#ifdef INCLUDE_STRING
++# include <string>
++#endif
+ #ifdef INCLUDE_VECTOR
+ # include <vector>
+ #endif
+@@ -245,6 +229,19 @@ extern int errno;
+ # include <type_traits>
+ #endif
+
++/* There are an extraordinary number of issues with <ctype.h>.
++ The last straw is that it varies with the locale. Use libiberty's
++ replacement instead. */
++#include "safe-ctype.h"
++
++#include <sys/types.h>
++
++#include <errno.h>
++
++#if !defined (errno) && defined (HAVE_DECL_ERRNO) && !HAVE_DECL_ERRNO
++extern int errno;
++#endif
++
+ /* Some of glibc's string inlines cause warnings. Plus we'd rather
+ rely on (and therefore test) GCC's string builtins. */
+ #define __NO_STRING_INLINES
+--
+2.39.3
+