summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/target/linux/brcm2708/patches-4.19/950-0754-Revert-net-bcmgenet-Workaround-for-Pi-4B-network-iss.patch
blob: 65f96bd65eba8704dd70f6efcd72976b7978fa67 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
From 024173b78ac6c6ce9dca879274b1e8a8e9000738 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:52:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 754/806] Revert "net: bcmgenet: Workaround for Pi 4B network
 issue"

This reverts commit 9c0770ea7682a84a22c33410ef6870af258abacc.
---
 .../net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c    | 22 -------------------
 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
@@ -72,10 +72,6 @@
 #define GENET_RDMA_REG_OFF	(priv->hw_params->rdma_offset + \
 				TOTAL_DESC * DMA_DESC_SIZE)
 
-static bool force_reneg = false;
-module_param(force_reneg, bool, 0444);
-MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_reneg, "Force a renegotiation after the initial link-up");
-
 static inline void bcmgenet_writel(u32 value, void __iomem *offset)
 {
 	/* MIPS chips strapped for BE will automagically configure the
@@ -2614,7 +2610,6 @@ static void bcmgenet_irq_task(struct wor
 	unsigned int status;
 	struct bcmgenet_priv *priv = container_of(
 			work, struct bcmgenet_priv, bcmgenet_irq_work);
-	static int first_link = 1;
 
 	netif_dbg(priv, intr, priv->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
 
@@ -2627,23 +2622,6 @@ static void bcmgenet_irq_task(struct wor
 	if (status & UMAC_IRQ_LINK_EVENT) {
 		priv->dev->phydev->link = !!(status & UMAC_IRQ_LINK_UP);
 		phy_mac_interrupt(priv->dev->phydev);
-
-		if (priv->dev->phydev->link && first_link) {
-			first_link = 0;
-			/*
-			 * HACK: Some Pi4Bs, when paired with some switches,
-			 * come up in a strange state where they are unable to
-			 * transmit, causing them to fail to get an IP address.
-			 * Although the failure mechanism is not yet understood,
-			 * forcing renegotiation at this point has been shown
-			 * to be effective in avoiding the problem.
-			 */
-			if (force_reneg) {
-				dev_info(&priv->pdev->dev,
-					 "Forcing renegotiation\n");
-				genphy_restart_aneg(priv->dev->phydev);
-			}
-		}
 	}
 }