summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/UefiCpuPkg
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRuiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>2018-09-25 13:21:40 +0800
committerRuiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>2018-09-26 13:09:15 +0800
commit447b08b3d2a3e04a9fccda68c72a2ff62d8197e9 (patch)
tree5a5e5937f37492865a17b20098c9877f50745897 /UefiCpuPkg
parent69b40465048e4289854d881e90007811c09d42d8 (diff)
downloadedk2-447b08b3d2a3e04a9fccda68c72a2ff62d8197e9.tar.gz
edk2-447b08b3d2a3e04a9fccda68c72a2ff62d8197e9.tar.bz2
edk2-447b08b3d2a3e04a9fccda68c72a2ff62d8197e9.zip
UefiCpuPkg/MtrrLib: Revert "Skip MSR access when the pair is invalid"
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1187 The patch reverts 9c8c4478cfcacaf5fd60b75ff78d26732d93a5b8 "UefiCpuPkg/MtrrLib: Skip Base MSR access when the pair is invalid". Microsoft Windows will report an error in event manager if MTRR usage is different across hibernate even when the difference is in an non valid MTRR pair. This seems like a bug in Windows but for compatibility and servicing reasons we think a change in UEFI would wise. A Windows change has already been submitted for the next iteration (2019 time frame). Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com> Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'UefiCpuPkg')
-rw-r--r--UefiCpuPkg/Library/MtrrLib/MtrrLib.c29
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MtrrLib/MtrrLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MtrrLib/MtrrLib.c
index dfce9a996b..086f7ad8f0 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MtrrLib/MtrrLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MtrrLib/MtrrLib.c
@@ -449,13 +449,10 @@ MtrrGetVariableMtrrWorker (
for (Index = 0; Index < VariableMtrrCount; Index++) {
if (MtrrSetting == NULL) {
- VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Mask = AsmReadMsr64 (MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSMASK0 + (Index << 1));
- //
- // Skip to read the Base MSR when the Mask.V is not set.
- //
- if (((MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSMASK_REGISTER *)&VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Mask)->Bits.V != 0) {
- VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Base = AsmReadMsr64 (MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSBASE0 + (Index << 1));
- }
+ VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Base =
+ AsmReadMsr64 (MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSBASE0 + (Index << 1));
+ VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Mask =
+ AsmReadMsr64 (MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSMASK0 + (Index << 1));
} else {
VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Base = MtrrSetting->Variables.Mtrr[Index].Base;
VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Mask = MtrrSetting->Variables.Mtrr[Index].Mask;
@@ -2604,14 +2601,14 @@ MtrrSetVariableMtrrWorker (
ASSERT (VariableMtrrCount <= ARRAY_SIZE (VariableSettings->Mtrr));
for (Index = 0; Index < VariableMtrrCount; Index++) {
- //
- // Mask MSR is always updated since caller might need to invalidate the MSR pair.
- // Base MSR is skipped when Mask.V is not set.
- //
- AsmWriteMsr64 (MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSMASK0 + (Index << 1), VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Mask);
- if (((MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSMASK_REGISTER *)&VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Mask)->Bits.V != 0) {
- AsmWriteMsr64 (MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSBASE0 + (Index << 1), VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Base);
- }
+ AsmWriteMsr64 (
+ MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSBASE0 + (Index << 1),
+ VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Base
+ );
+ AsmWriteMsr64 (
+ MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSMASK0 + (Index << 1),
+ VariableSettings->Mtrr[Index].Mask
+ );
}
}
@@ -2868,7 +2865,7 @@ MtrrDebugPrintAllMtrrsWorker (
}
ContainVariableMtrr = FALSE;
for (Index = 0; Index < VariableMtrrCount; Index++) {
- if (((MSR_IA32_MTRR_PHYSMASK_REGISTER *)&Mtrrs->Variables.Mtrr[Index].Mask)->Bits.V == 0) {
+ if ((Mtrrs->Variables.Mtrr[Index].Mask & BIT11) == 0) {
//
// If mask is not valid, then do not display range
//