summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/dediprog.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>2022-05-24 15:07:34 +0200
committerNico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>2022-06-23 14:38:08 +0000
commitd90e2b3e2c37aa63e0dbb4e7359e8043704d815b (patch)
tree0299fa7ae376cd15ea45bf8b2d7729c0dda0d9dd /dediprog.c
parent418916428f38e86368c980cc7efdf5c9c615f7cd (diff)
downloadflashrom-d90e2b3e2c37aa63e0dbb4e7359e8043704d815b.tar.gz
flashrom-d90e2b3e2c37aa63e0dbb4e7359e8043704d815b.tar.bz2
flashrom-d90e2b3e2c37aa63e0dbb4e7359e8043704d815b.zip
flashchips,spi25: Replace `.wrea_override` with FEATURE_4BA_EAR_1716
There are two competing sets of instructions to access the extended address register of 4BA SPI chips. Some chips even support both sets. So far, we assumed the 0xc5/0xc8 instructions by default and allowed to override the write instructions with the `.wrea_override` field. This has some disadvantages: * The additional field is easily overlooked. So when adding a new flash chip, one might assume only 0xc5/0xc8 are supported. * We cannot describe flash chips completely that allow both instructions (and some programmers may be picky about which instructions can be used). Therefore, replace the `.wrea_override` field with a feature flag. Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Change-Id: I6d82f24898acd0789203516a7456fd785907bc10 Ticket: https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/357 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/64636 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'dediprog.c')
-rw-r--r--dediprog.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/dediprog.c b/dediprog.c
index 7a7ae3b76..42e0ed92b 100644
--- a/dediprog.c
+++ b/dediprog.c
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static int prepare_rw_cmd(
}
}
} else {
- if (flash->chip->feature_bits & FEATURE_4BA_EAR_C5C8) {
+ if (flash->chip->feature_bits & FEATURE_4BA_EAR_ANY) {
if (spi_set_extended_address(flash, start >> 24))
return 1;
} else if (start >> 24) {