summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>2016-07-10 10:04:02 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2016-08-16 09:33:15 +0200
commit3c679108b6e576f4da4e165f90e1227b2e357383 (patch)
tree1c6264777d6185f00d38cfc7316e680e0a0b4831
parente2bd71e79379a989412608cc10f5e7e512924cca (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-3c679108b6e576f4da4e165f90e1227b2e357383.tar.gz
linux-stable-3c679108b6e576f4da4e165f90e1227b2e357383.tar.bz2
linux-stable-3c679108b6e576f4da4e165f90e1227b2e357383.zip
tcp: make challenge acks less predictable
[ Upstream commit 75ff39ccc1bd5d3c455b6822ab09e533c551f758 ] Yue Cao claims that current host rate limiting of challenge ACKS (RFC 5961) could leak enough information to allow a patient attacker to hijack TCP sessions. He will soon provide details in an academic paper. This patch increases the default limit from 100 to 1000, and adds some randomization so that the attacker can no longer hijack sessions without spending a considerable amount of probes. Based on initial analysis and patch from Linus. Note that we also have per socket rate limiting, so it is tempting to remove the host limit in the future. v2: randomize the count of challenge acks per second, not the period. Fixes: 282f23c6ee34 ("tcp: implement RFC 5961 3.2") Reported-by: Yue Cao <ycao009@ucr.edu> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--net/ipv4/tcp_input.c15
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index c124c3c12f7c..593b14165f34 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale __read_mostly = 1;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sysctl_tcp_adv_win_scale);
/* rfc5961 challenge ack rate limiting */
-int sysctl_tcp_challenge_ack_limit = 100;
+int sysctl_tcp_challenge_ack_limit = 1000;
int sysctl_tcp_stdurg __read_mostly;
int sysctl_tcp_rfc1337 __read_mostly;
@@ -3460,7 +3460,7 @@ static void tcp_send_challenge_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb)
static u32 challenge_timestamp;
static unsigned int challenge_count;
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
- u32 now;
+ u32 count, now;
/* First check our per-socket dupack rate limit. */
if (tcp_oow_rate_limited(sock_net(sk), skb,
@@ -3468,13 +3468,18 @@ static void tcp_send_challenge_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb)
&tp->last_oow_ack_time))
return;
- /* Then check the check host-wide RFC 5961 rate limit. */
+ /* Then check host-wide RFC 5961 rate limit. */
now = jiffies / HZ;
if (now != challenge_timestamp) {
+ u32 half = (sysctl_tcp_challenge_ack_limit + 1) >> 1;
+
challenge_timestamp = now;
- challenge_count = 0;
+ WRITE_ONCE(challenge_count, half +
+ prandom_u32_max(sysctl_tcp_challenge_ack_limit));
}
- if (++challenge_count <= sysctl_tcp_challenge_ack_limit) {
+ count = READ_ONCE(challenge_count);
+ if (count > 0) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(challenge_count, count - 1);
NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPCHALLENGEACK);
tcp_send_ack(sk);
}