summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>2024-02-14 10:31:16 +0100
committerUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>2024-02-15 12:59:21 +0100
commit7256c2e79b8ed922d52d3487a2d5b022c6f37c0d (patch)
tree1b4b981b910db13dfa44a1d8bde44edf96b6f31f
parentb1a80d5053f3d94b132642aacfcadc55782d1e65 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-7256c2e79b8ed922d52d3487a2d5b022c6f37c0d.tar.gz
linux-stable-7256c2e79b8ed922d52d3487a2d5b022c6f37c0d.tar.bz2
linux-stable-7256c2e79b8ed922d52d3487a2d5b022c6f37c0d.zip
pwm: cros-ec: Change prototype of helpers to prepare further changes
pwm_chip allocation and registration is about to change. For that the number of PWM devices must be known earlier in cros_ec_pwm_probe(). So make cros_ec_pwm_get_duty() and cros_ec_num_pwms() independent of struct cros_ec_pwm_device which is only available later. Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c0cfc75c1cba0f735555e0138387143ec101feb3.1707900770.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
-rw-r--r--drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c17
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
index 339cedf3a7b1..e556f6218dd7 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
@@ -93,9 +93,8 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_set_duty(struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm, u8 index,
return cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec, msg);
}
-static int cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm, u8 index)
+static int cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(struct cros_ec_device *ec, bool use_pwm_type, u8 index)
{
- struct cros_ec_device *ec = ec_pwm->ec;
struct {
struct cros_ec_command msg;
union {
@@ -115,7 +114,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm, u8 index)
msg->insize = sizeof(*resp);
msg->outsize = sizeof(*params);
- if (ec_pwm->use_pwm_type) {
+ if (use_pwm_type) {
ret = cros_ec_dt_type_to_pwm_type(index, &params->pwm_type);
if (ret) {
dev_err(ec->dev, "Invalid PWM type index: %d\n", index);
@@ -171,7 +170,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct cros_ec_pwm *channel = &ec_pwm->channel[pwm->hwpwm];
int ret;
- ret = cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec_pwm, pwm->hwpwm);
+ ret = cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec_pwm->ec, ec_pwm->use_pwm_type, pwm->hwpwm);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(chip->dev, "error getting initial duty: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
@@ -226,13 +225,17 @@ static const struct pwm_ops cros_ec_pwm_ops = {
* of PWMs it supports directly, so we have to read the pwm duty cycle for
* subsequent channels until we get an error.
*/
-static int cros_ec_num_pwms(struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm)
+static int cros_ec_num_pwms(struct cros_ec_device *ec)
{
int i, ret;
/* The index field is only 8 bits */
for (i = 0; i <= U8_MAX; i++) {
- ret = cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec_pwm, i);
+ /*
+ * Note that this function is only called when use_pwm_type is
+ * false. With use_pwm_type == true the number of PWMs is fixed.
+ */
+ ret = cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec, false, i);
/*
* We look for SUCCESS, INVALID_COMMAND, or INVALID_PARAM
* responses; everything else is treated as an error.
@@ -283,7 +286,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ec_pwm->use_pwm_type) {
chip->npwm = CROS_EC_PWM_DT_COUNT;
} else {
- ret = cros_ec_num_pwms(ec_pwm);
+ ret = cros_ec_num_pwms(ec);
if (ret < 0)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Couldn't find PWMs\n");
chip->npwm = ret;