diff options
| author | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> | 2019-08-19 17:17:59 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> | 2019-08-19 21:54:16 -0700 |
| commit | 9d1f8be5cf42b497a3bddf1d523f2bb142e9318c (patch) | |
| tree | fc926ba08f6b2b69c2b9341de2a16d2870b25bda | |
| parent | a94549dd87f5ea4ca50fee493df08a2dc6256b53 (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-9d1f8be5cf42b497a3bddf1d523f2bb142e9318c.tar.gz linux-stable-9d1f8be5cf42b497a3bddf1d523f2bb142e9318c.tar.bz2 linux-stable-9d1f8be5cf42b497a3bddf1d523f2bb142e9318c.zip | |
bpf: Restrict bpf when kernel lockdown is in confidentiality mode
bpf_read() and bpf_read_str() could potentially be abused to (eg) allow
private keys in kernel memory to be leaked. Disable them if the kernel
has been locked down in confidentiality mode.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
cc: Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@suse.com>
cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/security.h | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 10 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | security/lockdown/lockdown.c | 1 |
3 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index 0b2529dbf0f4..e604f4c67f03 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ enum lockdown_reason { LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX, LOCKDOWN_KCORE, LOCKDOWN_KPROBES, + LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ, LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX, }; diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 1c9a4745e596..33a954c367f3 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -139,8 +139,13 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read, void *, dst, u32, size, const void *, unsafe_ptr) { int ret; + ret = security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ); + if (ret < 0) + goto out; + ret = probe_kernel_read(dst, unsafe_ptr, size); if (unlikely(ret < 0)) +out: memset(dst, 0, size); return ret; @@ -566,6 +571,10 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_str, void *, dst, u32, size, { int ret; + ret = security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ); + if (ret < 0) + goto out; + /* * The strncpy_from_unsafe() call will likely not fill the entire * buffer, but that's okay in this circumstance as we're probing @@ -577,6 +586,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_str, void *, dst, u32, size, */ ret = strncpy_from_unsafe(dst, unsafe_ptr, size); if (unlikely(ret < 0)) +out: memset(dst, 0, size); return ret; diff --git a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c index 27b2cf51e443..2397772c56bd 100644 --- a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c +++ b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static char *lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1] = { [LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX] = "integrity", [LOCKDOWN_KCORE] = "/proc/kcore access", [LOCKDOWN_KPROBES] = "use of kprobes", + [LOCKDOWN_BPF_READ] = "use of bpf to read kernel RAM", [LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX] = "confidentiality", }; |