diff options
| author | Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> | 2022-02-02 22:31:03 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2022-02-08 18:35:20 +0100 |
| commit | bd69089ce5b1ad1b7ad443e95a903b6241e206e3 (patch) | |
| tree | 56a7181587c84169fa0a101522b34fdfa2e8cf45 | |
| parent | 6506bb5b1c4496829032e461202a2cd4e49ed2bc (diff) | |
| download | linux-stable-bd69089ce5b1ad1b7ad443e95a903b6241e206e3.tar.gz linux-stable-bd69089ce5b1ad1b7ad443e95a903b6241e206e3.tar.bz2 linux-stable-bd69089ce5b1ad1b7ad443e95a903b6241e206e3.zip | |
cgroup/cpuset: Fix "suspicious RCU usage" lockdep warning
commit 2bdfd2825c9662463371e6691b1a794e97fa36b4 upstream.
It was found that a "suspicious RCU usage" lockdep warning was issued
with the rcu_read_lock() call in update_sibling_cpumasks(). It is
because the update_cpumasks_hier() function may sleep. So we have
to release the RCU lock, call update_cpumasks_hier() and reacquire
it afterward.
Also add a percpu_rwsem_assert_held() in update_sibling_cpumasks()
instead of stating that in the comment.
Fixes: 4716909cc5c5 ("cpuset: Track cpusets that use parent's effective_cpus")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c index ff8f2f522eb5..d729cbd2445a 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c @@ -1530,10 +1530,15 @@ static void update_sibling_cpumasks(struct cpuset *parent, struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *sibling; struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css; + percpu_rwsem_assert_held(&cpuset_rwsem); + /* * Check all its siblings and call update_cpumasks_hier() * if their use_parent_ecpus flag is set in order for them * to use the right effective_cpus value. + * + * The update_cpumasks_hier() function may sleep. So we have to + * release the RCU read lock before calling it. */ rcu_read_lock(); cpuset_for_each_child(sibling, pos_css, parent) { @@ -1541,8 +1546,13 @@ static void update_sibling_cpumasks(struct cpuset *parent, struct cpuset *cs, continue; if (!sibling->use_parent_ecpus) continue; + if (!css_tryget_online(&sibling->css)) + continue; + rcu_read_unlock(); update_cpumasks_hier(sibling, tmp); + rcu_read_lock(); + css_put(&sibling->css); } rcu_read_unlock(); } |