summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBaisong Zhong <zhongbaisong@huawei.com>2022-11-02 16:16:20 +0800
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2022-11-04 16:22:34 +0100
commitd3fd203f36d46aa29600a72d57a1b61af80e4a25 (patch)
tree37078ce103d62c347357e338e020eda698e948e0
parent1118b2049d77ca0b505775fc1a8d1909cf19a7ec (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-d3fd203f36d46aa29600a72d57a1b61af80e4a25.tar.gz
linux-stable-d3fd203f36d46aa29600a72d57a1b61af80e4a25.tar.bz2
linux-stable-d3fd203f36d46aa29600a72d57a1b61af80e4a25.zip
bpf, test_run: Fix alignment problem in bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
We got a syzkaller problem because of aarch64 alignment fault if KFENCE enabled. When the size from user bpf program is an odd number, like 399, 407, etc, it will cause the struct skb_shared_info's unaligned access. As seen below: BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in __skb_clone+0x23c/0x2a0 net/core/skbuff.c:1032 Use-after-free read at 0xffff6254fffac077 (in kfence-#213): __lse_atomic_add arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:26 [inline] arch_atomic_add arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:28 [inline] arch_atomic_inc include/linux/atomic-arch-fallback.h:270 [inline] atomic_inc include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:241 [inline] __skb_clone+0x23c/0x2a0 net/core/skbuff.c:1032 skb_clone+0xf4/0x214 net/core/skbuff.c:1481 ____bpf_clone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2433 [inline] bpf_clone_redirect+0x78/0x1c0 net/core/filter.c:2420 bpf_prog_d3839dd9068ceb51+0x80/0x330 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:728 [inline] bpf_test_run+0x3c0/0x6c0 net/bpf/test_run.c:53 bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x638/0xa7c net/bpf/test_run.c:594 bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3148 [inline] __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4441 [inline] __se_sys_bpf+0xad0/0x1634 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4381 kfence-#213: 0xffff6254fffac000-0xffff6254fffac196, size=407, cache=kmalloc-512 allocated by task 15074 on cpu 0 at 1342.585390s: kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:568 [inline] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:675 [inline] bpf_test_init.isra.0+0xac/0x290 net/bpf/test_run.c:191 bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x11c/0xa7c net/bpf/test_run.c:512 bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3148 [inline] __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4441 [inline] __se_sys_bpf+0xad0/0x1634 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4381 __arm64_sys_bpf+0x50/0x60 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4381 To fix the problem, we adjust @size so that (@size + @hearoom) is a multiple of SMP_CACHE_BYTES. So we make sure the struct skb_shared_info is aligned to a cache line. Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command") Signed-off-by: Baisong Zhong <zhongbaisong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221102081620.1465154-1-zhongbaisong@huawei.com
-rw-r--r--net/bpf/test_run.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 13d578ce2a09..fcb3e6c5e03c 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -774,6 +774,7 @@ static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
if (user_size > size)
return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
+ size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
if (!data)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);