summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>2020-11-11 13:03:46 +0800
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2020-11-11 10:50:22 +0100
commitf16e631333a8f12ae8128826e695db4b2a528407 (patch)
tree41eac337a24c16ea550360f0a33ad344972e8ee9
parentabbaa433de07076fb8ef524b77ce55d94bad5fc5 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-f16e631333a8f12ae8128826e695db4b2a528407.tar.gz
linux-stable-f16e631333a8f12ae8128826e695db4b2a528407.tar.bz2
linux-stable-f16e631333a8f12ae8128826e695db4b2a528407.zip
bpf: Fix unsigned 'datasec_id' compared with zero in check_pseudo_btf_id
The unsigned variable datasec_id is assigned a return value from the call to check_pseudo_btf_id(), which may return negative error code. This fixes the following coccicheck warning: ./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9616:5-15: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: datasec_id > 0 Fixes: eaa6bcb71ef6 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()") Reported-by: Tosk Robot <tencent_os_robot@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1605071026-25906-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c3
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6200519582a6..6204ec705d80 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9572,12 +9572,13 @@ static int check_pseudo_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_insn *insn,
struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux)
{
- u32 datasec_id, type, id = insn->imm;
const struct btf_var_secinfo *vsi;
const struct btf_type *datasec;
const struct btf_type *t;
const char *sym_name;
bool percpu = false;
+ u32 type, id = insn->imm;
+ s32 datasec_id;
u64 addr;
int i;