diff options
author | Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> | 2023-11-03 16:05:38 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> | 2023-11-30 12:52:54 -0800 |
commit | f2f63f7ec6fd13d2d5d5c6d90ea438fbb5a36adc (patch) | |
tree | 2b134778c9d58bc34bde54959ab2c745ead60cdd /arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_ext.c | |
parent | 1647b52757d59131fe30cf73fa36fac834d4367f (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-f2f63f7ec6fd13d2d5d5c6d90ea438fbb5a36adc.tar.gz linux-stable-f2f63f7ec6fd13d2d5d5c6d90ea438fbb5a36adc.tar.bz2 linux-stable-f2f63f7ec6fd13d2d5d5c6d90ea438fbb5a36adc.zip |
KVM: x86/pmu: Stop calling kvm_pmu_reset() at RESET (it's redundant)
Drop kvm_vcpu_reset()'s call to kvm_pmu_reset(), the call is performed
only for RESET, which is really just the same thing as vCPU creation,
and kvm_arch_vcpu_create() *just* called kvm_pmu_init(), i.e. there can't
possibly be any work to do.
Unlike Intel, AMD's amd_pmu_refresh() does fill all_valid_pmc_idx even if
guest CPUID is empty, but everything that is at all dynamic is guaranteed
to be '0'/NULL, e.g. it should be impossible for KVM to have already
created a perf event.
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103230541.352265-4-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_ext.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions