summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/s390/kvm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorClaudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>2021-09-20 15:24:50 +0200
committerChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>2021-10-25 09:20:38 +0200
commitd4074324b07a94a1fca476d452dfbb3a4e7bf656 (patch)
tree7754a919724458c5cae701b701177d2c80f86c7e /arch/s390/kvm
parent57c5df13eca4017ed28f9375dc1d246ec0f54217 (diff)
downloadlinux-stable-d4074324b07a94a1fca476d452dfbb3a4e7bf656.tar.gz
linux-stable-d4074324b07a94a1fca476d452dfbb3a4e7bf656.tar.bz2
linux-stable-d4074324b07a94a1fca476d452dfbb3a4e7bf656.zip
KVM: s390: pv: avoid double free of sida page
If kvm_s390_pv_destroy_cpu is called more than once, we risk calling free_page on a random page, since the sidad field is aliased with the gbea, which is not guaranteed to be zero. This can happen, for example, if userspace calls the KVM_PV_DISABLE IOCTL, and it fails, and then userspace calls the same IOCTL again. This scenario is only possible if KVM has some serious bug or if the hardware is broken. The solution is to simply return successfully immediately if the vCPU was already non secure. Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Fixes: 19e1227768863a1469797c13ef8fea1af7beac2c ("KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer") Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20210920132502.36111-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390/kvm')
-rw-r--r--arch/s390/kvm/pv.c19
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
index c8841f476e91..0a854115100b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
@@ -16,18 +16,17 @@
int kvm_s390_pv_destroy_cpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
{
- int cc = 0;
+ int cc;
- if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu)) {
- cc = uv_cmd_nodata(kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu),
- UVC_CMD_DESTROY_SEC_CPU, rc, rrc);
+ if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu))
+ return 0;
+
+ cc = uv_cmd_nodata(kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu), UVC_CMD_DESTROY_SEC_CPU, rc, rrc);
+
+ KVM_UV_EVENT(vcpu->kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VCPU %d: rc %x rrc %x",
+ vcpu->vcpu_id, *rc, *rrc);
+ WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy cpu failed rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc);
- KVM_UV_EVENT(vcpu->kvm, 3,
- "PROTVIRT DESTROY VCPU %d: rc %x rrc %x",
- vcpu->vcpu_id, *rc, *rrc);
- WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy cpu failed rc %x rrc %x",
- *rc, *rrc);
- }
/* Intended memory leak for something that should never happen. */
if (!cc)
free_pages(vcpu->arch.pv.stor_base,