diff options
author | Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> | 2023-12-05 11:36:22 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> | 2023-12-07 09:34:27 -0800 |
commit | b2e02f82b7f76234305c5a7fba4dbebc47ce4cb5 (patch) | |
tree | 859bc4258349f1787f01e586ab7e0891c894db7c /arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | |
parent | af9d544a452114eb54638015544b884e1befd0fb (diff) | |
download | linux-stable-b2e02f82b7f76234305c5a7fba4dbebc47ce4cb5.tar.gz linux-stable-b2e02f82b7f76234305c5a7fba4dbebc47ce4cb5.tar.bz2 linux-stable-b2e02f82b7f76234305c5a7fba4dbebc47ce4cb5.zip |
KVM: nVMX: Split off helper for emulating VMCLEAR on Hyper-V eVMCS
To avoid overloading handle_vmclear() with Hyper-V specific details and to
prepare the code to making Hyper-V emulation optional, create a dedicated
nested_evmcs_handle_vmclear() helper.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Tested-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205103630.1391318-9-vkuznets@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 38 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c index 382c0746d069..903b6f9ea2bd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c @@ -243,6 +243,29 @@ static inline void nested_release_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } } +static bool nested_evmcs_handle_vmclear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t vmptr) +{ + struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu); + /* + * When Enlightened VMEntry is enabled on the calling CPU we treat + * memory area pointer by vmptr as Enlightened VMCS (as there's no good + * way to distinguish it from VMCS12) and we must not corrupt it by + * writing to the non-existent 'launch_state' field. The area doesn't + * have to be the currently active EVMCS on the calling CPU and there's + * nothing KVM has to do to transition it from 'active' to 'non-active' + * state. It is possible that the area will stay mapped as + * vmx->nested.hv_evmcs but this shouldn't be a problem. + */ + if (!guest_cpuid_has_evmcs(vcpu) || + !evmptr_is_valid(nested_get_evmptr(vcpu))) + return false; + + if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs && vmptr == vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr) + nested_release_evmcs(vcpu); + + return true; +} + static void vmx_sync_vmcs_host_state(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *prev) { @@ -5286,18 +5309,7 @@ static int handle_vmclear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (vmptr == vmx->nested.vmxon_ptr) return nested_vmx_fail(vcpu, VMXERR_VMCLEAR_VMXON_POINTER); - /* - * When Enlightened VMEntry is enabled on the calling CPU we treat - * memory area pointer by vmptr as Enlightened VMCS (as there's no good - * way to distinguish it from VMCS12) and we must not corrupt it by - * writing to the non-existent 'launch_state' field. The area doesn't - * have to be the currently active EVMCS on the calling CPU and there's - * nothing KVM has to do to transition it from 'active' to 'non-active' - * state. It is possible that the area will stay mapped as - * vmx->nested.hv_evmcs but this shouldn't be a problem. - */ - if (likely(!guest_cpuid_has_evmcs(vcpu) || - !evmptr_is_valid(nested_get_evmptr(vcpu)))) { + if (likely(!nested_evmcs_handle_vmclear(vcpu, vmptr))) { if (vmptr == vmx->nested.current_vmptr) nested_release_vmcs12(vcpu); @@ -5314,8 +5326,6 @@ static int handle_vmclear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vmptr + offsetof(struct vmcs12, launch_state), &zero, sizeof(zero)); - } else if (vmx->nested.hv_evmcs && vmptr == vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr) { - nested_release_evmcs(vcpu); } return nested_vmx_succeed(vcpu); |